HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #14881  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2012, 11:55 PM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch.G, Ch.G View Post
How is this a controversial position? Can anyone provide a defense for parking minimums that doesn't fall apart upon scrutiny?
The only one that seems to matter:

Individuals influential with aldermen think they are necessary.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14882  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 2:18 AM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,387
On-site parking minimizes the impact of new development on existing neighborhoods. The protests from existing residents would be deafening if they thought a new townhouse development would mean two dozen more cars competing for street parking on a given block.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14883  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 4:20 AM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,212
http://www.cityofchicago.org/content...eworkplan.html
...

Chicagoans are invited to an open house and public hearing ... for the presentation of the Framework Plan for the Bloomingdale Trail and Park, Chicago’s first elevated, multi‐use linear park and bike trail.
The presentation and meeting will be held on Thursday, March 8th, 2012 from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at the Yates Elementary School, located at 1839 N. Richmond St. in Chicago. ...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14884  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 4:32 AM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,212
The new PDF schematic on this page shows just how much of the Midtown Athletic Club's buildings will have to be chopped off for Elston. I wonder if they have worked out how much time that property transfer is going to take or if it will be a litigation wildcard.


http://www.cityofchicago.org/content...provement.html

Damen-Elston-Fullerton intersection improvement
...
UPDATE February 2012: Based on feedback received at, and subsequent to, the April 2011 public hearing, CDOT will propose changes ...
1. ... separating the bike lanes on rerouted Elston from traffic with a 2' wide curb barrier ...
2. ... along Damen Avenue north of Fullerton Avenue ... widen the right-of-way in order to accommodate both 5 lanes of traffic and 5' striped bike lanes ...
3. ... south of Fullerton along Damen will be widened ...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14885  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 4:41 AM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,212
Also, Kingsbury reconstruction between North and Division is starting tomorrow, and going through August.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14886  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 6:13 AM
Rizzo Rizzo is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by denizen467 View Post
The new PDF schematic on this page shows just how much of the Midtown Athletic Club's buildings will have to be chopped off for Elston. I wonder if they have worked out how much time that property transfer is going to take or if it will be a litigation wildcard.


http://www.cityofchicago.org/content...provement.html

Damen-Elston-Fullerton intersection improvement
...
UPDATE February 2012: Based on feedback received at, and subsequent to, the April 2011 public hearing, CDOT will propose changes ...
1. ... separating the bike lanes on rerouted Elston from traffic with a 2' wide curb barrier ...
2. ... along Damen Avenue north of Fullerton Avenue ... widen the right-of-way in order to accommodate both 5 lanes of traffic and 5' striped bike lanes ...
3. ... south of Fullerton along Damen will be widened ...
Looks like the Whirlyball place is doomed lol.

Midtown Athletic Club doesn't exactly make the most efficient use of the current intersection from a spacial standpoint. If they get good compensation out of this, perhaps with some reconfiguration at a squared up intersection they can improve their facilities and add more courts.

Other than Midtown Athletic and the strip mall, the rest of the buildings are vacant and of little importance. All of the land next to 1880 plaza is potentially for sale. The mall could rebuild if retailers prefer to remain there and when a new building is complete, the old one comes down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14887  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 10:12 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,381
I don't think Midtown will be able to expand into the triangle plot of land where Elston used to be. The city is retaining that parcel because it has a large number of utilities beneath it and relocating the utilities to the new Elston alignment would add significant cost.

Hopefully the remnant plots can be landscaped with trees and benches to soften up what is a very harsh, unattractive area. Midtown might even reorient towards the intersection with a new front entrance.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14888  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 2:16 PM
wrab's Avatar
wrab wrab is offline
Deerhoof Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,670
Bingo .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
On-site parking minimizes the impact of new development on existing neighborhoods. The protests from existing residents would be deafening if they thought a new townhouse development would mean two dozen more cars competing for street parking on a given block.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14889  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 2:20 PM
orulz orulz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 585
Any idea how they would be able to remove snow from those 6.5 foot wide cycle tracks?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14890  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 2:33 PM
aic4ever aic4ever is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by orulz View Post
Any idea how they would be able to remove snow from those 6.5 foot wide cycle tracks?
The same way they remove snow in Bronzeville.
__________________
Don't be a left wing zombie!

Free Nowhereman...fat girls need lovin' too
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14891  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 3:26 PM
Rizzo Rizzo is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by orulz View Post
Any idea how they would be able to remove snow from those 6.5 foot wide cycle tracks?
They use multi-purpose vehicles (used to plow larger sidewalks and cut grass).

http://en.prinoth.com/Utility-Vehicles/SW%C2%AE-4S


I've also seen an absurd amount of salt used. I was riding on the new cycle track over by Malcolm X college. and there was actually small drifts of salt lol,

The bollards should be flexible and durable enough to handle any accidental impact by a plow. They are also easily replaceable if damaged.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14892  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 3:47 PM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,492
^^^ They really shouldn't use excessive salt on a cycle track. Breaking quickly on salt can shred your rear tube as fresh salt is practically as sharp as shattered glass.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14893  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 4:30 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayward View Post
The bollards should be flexible and durable enough to handle any accidental impact by a plow. They are also easily replaceable if damaged.
The Elston cycle track won't have bollards like the Kinzie one. It has an honest-to-god curb separating it from the traffic lanes. It may have bollards on top to improve visibility, or they may paint the curb yellow or stripe it or something like the old Lower Wacker.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14894  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 7:33 PM
Rizzo Rizzo is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
The Elston cycle track won't have bollards like the Kinzie one. It has an honest-to-god curb separating it from the traffic lanes. It may have bollards on top to improve visibility, or they may paint the curb yellow or stripe it or something like the old Lower Wacker.
Sweet! I should have read the plan in more detail.

---------------

FYI, I was complaining about slow progress on the new Starbucks on Rush the other day. The next day after, they were working like crazy. Great to see work resuming. I also noticed concrete truck hoses pouring new floors in at the Esquire

I can't believe how much change has occurred at Oak and Rush over the past couple of years. This leaves the big empty lot at Walton and State as the next available space for a highrise development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14895  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 9:19 PM
intrepidDesign's Avatar
intrepidDesign intrepidDesign is offline
Windy City Dan
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 494
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
The Elston cycle track won't have bollards like the Kinzie one. It has an honest-to-god curb separating it from the traffic lanes. It may have bollards on top to improve visibility, or they may paint the curb yellow or stripe it or something like the old Lower Wacker.
I wish the Kinzie bike lane would have a curb separation. The bollards seem cheap and almost half committed. Washington street is another example of a bike lane that could be vastly improved. I wish from Desplains west they would get rid of all street parking on the south of the street and make that a bike only lane, make the current bike lane a raised separation with intermittent breaks for bus stops.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14896  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 9:49 PM
aic4ever aic4ever is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 381
You know what would be awesome would be if there were some kind of raised, four or five foot wide pathways with curbs next to the roads that protected people from vehicles, that people might be able to ride their bikes on.
__________________
Don't be a left wing zombie!

Free Nowhereman...fat girls need lovin' too
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14897  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 10:07 PM
intrepidDesign's Avatar
intrepidDesign intrepidDesign is offline
Windy City Dan
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 494
Quote:
Originally Posted by aic4ever View Post
You know what would be awesome would be if there were some kind of raised, four or five foot wide pathways with curbs next to the roads that protected people from vehicles, that people might be able to ride their bikes on.
Are you seriously suggesting sidewalks be used as bike lanes?? That's the only conclusion I can make due to the eye rolling emoticon. If that is indeed the case you're trying to make, then I'm stunned that anyone would think that's a solution.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14898  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 10:11 PM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,492
Whenever I'm walking on the sidewalk and I see someone riding their bike on it I am extremely tempted to knock them off their bike as they pass me. Only a fucking moron rides their bike on the sidewalk in the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14899  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 10:39 PM
aic4ever aic4ever is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by intrepidDesign View Post
Are you seriously suggesting sidewalks be used as bike lanes?? That's the only conclusion I can make due to the eye rolling emoticon. If that is indeed the case you're trying to make, then I'm stunned that anyone would think that's a solution.
I am, actually, yes. It's not like we're putting these stupid "protected" bike lanes in pedestrian heavy areas anyway. The 18th street bridge over the river. Kinzie over by the Merchandise Mart.

These are ludicrous wastes of money when there are barely-used sidewalks already there.

And yes, I ride my bike on the sidewalk all the time, and I always have. If I'm coming up on a group of people, I jump down into the street if it's a safe enough spot to do so, or, heaven forbid, I slow down. I'd rather have some pedestrians pissed at me for 5 seconds than risk getting obliterated by a car or a truck or a bus.

EDIT:

I should clarify. NO, I do not suggest designating the sidewalks as bike lanes. I suggest that sidewalks be used by people on bikes, like they always have been meant to be anywhere else I've ever lived in my life, and in areas of the city that are ACTUALLY pedestrian heavy enough to require an actual, segregated, protected bike lane, that they be put in in those locations. We shouldn't be putting the stupid little sticks up all over the City to accommodate bikers that are either too stupid or too arrogant to ride their bikes safely, while simultaneously being too whiny to be ignored about how stupid they are.
__________________
Don't be a left wing zombie!

Free Nowhereman...fat girls need lovin' too

Last edited by aic4ever; Mar 5, 2012 at 10:46 PM. Reason: clarification
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14900  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2012, 11:22 PM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,617
Quote:
Originally Posted by aic4ever View Post
We shouldn't be putting the stupid little sticks up all over the City to accommodate bikers that are either too stupid or too arrogant to ride their bikes safely
The only one here being arrogant and unsafe is you. Bicycles on sidewalks are against the law, and for good reason. We can debate the merits of where protected lanes make best sense, but suggesting that curb hopping should become a standard and encouraged practice is foolish.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:34 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.