HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise & Supertall Proposals

    

706 Mission in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • San Francisco Skyscraper Diagram
San Francisco Projects & Construction Forum
            
View Full Map

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2013, 12:39 AM
1977's Avatar
1977 1977 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: All over the Bay Area
Posts: 563
Quote:
Originally Posted by peanut gallery View Post
That tangent aside, it's funny you posted those here 1977 because just yesterday I was looking over this thread again. I had noticed this article about the historic low inventory of available residential in San Francisco, which I thought might spur some of the larger proposals to get off the ground. If I recall correctly, several of the Rincon Hill developments are further along but for some reason this is the one I thought about first.
PG...Yeah, we were on the same page. It had been awhile since I had heard or seen anything about it so I did a quick search and found those updated renderings. I'd love to see some more or at least one that had included the whole tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted: Mar 14, 2013, 6:37 AM
minesweeper minesweeper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 201
The latest on this project is that hearing to certify the Environmental Impact Report is scheduled for March 21, 2013. Here is the Draft EIR: http://sfmea.sfplanning.org/2008.1084E_RTC1.pdf

Even if it is approved, the developers still have to get the height limit raised from the current 400 feet to 550 feet for the project to proceed as planned.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted: Mar 14, 2013, 9:56 PM
fimiak's Avatar
fimiak fimiak is online now
San Francisco Skywatcher
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco - SoMa
Posts: 197
I read through some of the comments about shadows in that pdf and couldn't help myself from leaving one of my own. Those people really have some sort of screws loose if shadows are that big of a concern to them. How can any official take complaints about shadows seriously when the city is having 2.6% pop. growth and ridiculously high housing prices and a positive job market. It boggles my mind.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted: Mar 15, 2013, 7:36 AM
NOPA NOPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by fimiak View Post
I read through some of the comments about shadows in that pdf and couldn't help myself from leaving one of my own. Those people really have some sort of screws loose if shadows are that big of a concern to them. How can any official take complaints about shadows seriously when the city is having 2.6% pop. growth and ridiculously high housing prices and a positive job market. It boggles my mind.
Well the city officials are complete trolls/scumbags so I'm not surprised at all. But honestly, if a shadow is that big of a deal then maybe city life isn't for you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted: Mar 30, 2013, 7:37 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,845
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted: Mar 30, 2013, 10:12 PM
tech12's Avatar
tech12 tech12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,204
Nice, those are the best renders yet. Where are they from?

And assuming this gets all the needed approvals, construction won't start until late next year:

Quote:
Millennium Partners' 706 Mission: still 18 months from construction
J.K. Dineen
San Francisco Business Times

Millennium Partners still has a long way to go at 706 Mission St.

Last week the developer reached an important milestone when the Planning Commission certified the environmental impact report for the project, which will include between 160 and 185 luxury condos and a home for the Mexican Museum on the bottom four floors.

But it’s only the first in a series of needed approvals. Next up the project will go to the Historic Preservation Commission, which will weigh in on plans to restore the 1903 Aronson Building. The historic building, home of Rochester Big & Tall, will be connected to a new adjacent 47-story tower. The project will then go back to the Planning Commission and the San Francisco Recreation and Park Commission for zoning approvals, as Millennium is proposing to exceed current zoning by 150 feet. Then it goes to the Board of Supervisors and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco.

Millennium Partners’ Sean Jeffries estimates that the additional bureaucratic hurdles will take another three to five months. He hopes to be under construction in August or September of 2014 — more than eight years after Millennium Partners tied the property up. “It's more slow-moving than we would like but we think it’s an important project for the city and that in the end, all the scrutiny will be good for the project and the Yerba Buena neighborhood.”

more: http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfranci....html?page=all
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted: Mar 31, 2013, 2:33 AM
1977's Avatar
1977 1977 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: All over the Bay Area
Posts: 563
Thanks for the renderings spyguy! I really like how this building looks from the east,
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted: Mar 31, 2013, 10:24 AM
mahanakorn's Avatar
mahanakorn mahanakorn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 69
The final image in Spy Guy's post #65 above shows the NW side of the Aronson Bldg (from 3rd street, currently a forlorn, blank wall) with windows. Does anyone know if that's part of the 706 Mission / Aronson remodel plan? If so, what an improvement!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted: Apr 1, 2013, 6:06 AM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is online now
Defend Equality!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 18,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by mahanakorn View Post
The final image in Spy Guy's post #65 above shows the NW side of the Aronson Bldg (from 3rd street, currently a forlorn, blank wall) with windows. Does anyone know if that's part of the 706 Mission / Aronson remodel plan? If so, what an improvement!
It appears so, and agreed--a definite improvement.
__________________
SFMTA traffic count: 8am-9am, inbound Market Street @ Van Ness:
5/14/09: 776 bicycles
5/09/13: 1,067 bicycles
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted: Apr 1, 2013, 6:50 AM
timbad timbad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by mahanakorn View Post
The final image in Spy Guy's post #65 above shows the NW side of the Aronson Bldg (from 3rd street, currently a forlorn, blank wall) with windows. Does anyone know if that's part of the 706 Mission / Aronson remodel plan? If so, what an improvement!
seems so, and just a reminder that window design had been a bit funkier at one point
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted: Apr 4, 2013, 8:31 PM
mahanakorn's Avatar
mahanakorn mahanakorn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by timbad View Post
seems so, and just a reminder that window design had been a bit funkier at one point
Woo! Forgot about that one. Funk is fun, but the Aronson is such a nicely proportioned building, I'm glad they're going with something more traditional.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted: May 8, 2013, 4:01 PM
minesweeper minesweeper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 201
Last night, an appeal of the EIR certification was heard before the Board of Supervisors. According to Sup. Eric Mar, the Board unanimously affirmed the EIR:

Quote:
Eric Mar
‏@ericmar415

#SF Board just voted unanimously to affirm the EIR of the Mexican Museum project near Yerba Buena Ctr…
http://instagram.com/p/ZCNgWWnUb3/
Long way to go with this one, but it's one more hurdle crossed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted: May 8, 2013, 7:03 PM
rocketman_95046's Avatar
rocketman_95046 rocketman_95046 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SD/SJ, CA, USA
Posts: 1,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by minesweeper View Post
Last night, an appeal of the EIR certification was heard before the Board of Supervisors. According to Sup. Eric Mar, the Board unanimously affirmed the EIR:



Long way to go with this one, but it's one more hurdle crossed.
That was a HUGE hurdle.
__________________
1,000 posts and still going...
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise & Supertall Proposals
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:11 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.