HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2023, 2:41 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 21,693
Nice updates, thanks. Does anybody know if 550 E Broadway was built under any of the rental building programs? Looks like small units and no parking.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2023, 3:01 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 5,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Nice updates, thanks. Does anybody know if 550 E Broadway was built under any of the rental building programs? Looks like small units and no parking.
I think it's just built to zoning, but the developer chose to do rental, rather than strata. The design changed with a different architect, but it remained rental.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2023, 7:09 PM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Nice updates, thanks. Does anybody know if 550 E Broadway was built under any of the rental building programs? Looks like small units and no parking.
It was originally proposed with 43 parking spaces on three levels, and with a 3rd CRU below ground on the P1 level. P2&3 access would have been with a vehicle lift from P1 which would have a traditional ramp to the lane.
https://web.archive.org/web/20171019...dway/index.htm


As build it looks like just one level of parking; from the building website it sounds like bike + dedicated car share only, no vehicle parking. https://rent550eb.ca/the-building/

My photo, Sept 2021. 2525 Carolina on the right has two levels.

Last edited by madog222; Apr 7, 2023 at 7:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2023, 12:55 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,588
Quote:
This mixed-use development is comprised of 3 storeys of residential accommodation over a single storey of commercial space at main floor level. The upper level provides amenity spaces and access to the roof terrace. A single storey below grade parkade provides bike and car parking facilities.

In order to maximize the gross floor area available in each rental unit, the upper storeys are constructed using point supported CLT. This system utilizes slender steel posts concealed within the demising walls. The use of discrete posts provides a soffit that is clear of obstructions making distribution of the mechanical and electrical services simple and straight forward, while maximizing the interior space within each unit.

The seismic force resisting system uses CLT shear walls. As most of the shear walls will be exposed, Aspect paid close attention to connection detailing to ensure the structure remains true to the architectural intent without unduly hindering the construction. The level 2 transfer slab and structure below is constructed using reinforced concrete. The concrete structure provides 2 commercial/retail units at main floor level, with additional spaces provided for back of house activities.

Due to tight site constraints the perimeter of the below grade parkade was formed using shotcrete to eliminate the additional space required for traditional cast in place concrete. As interior space is limited across this project, parkade circulation is provided by using a spiralized parkade ramp which wraps around a concrete core.
https://aspectengineers.com/portfoli...way-mixed-use/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2023, 1:20 AM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 5,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
And this seems unusual: "Gair Williamson Architects - Schematic Design and Original Development Permit; Michael Green Architecture - all other Architectural services." So they switched architects and changed the design to CLT for the upper floors without having to get a new Development Permit, and the new design and reduction in parking was treated as a minor amendment, rather than requiring a new Development Application.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted May 17, 2023, 9:11 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 566
New renderings of TransLink's proposed 30-storey rental housing tower at SkyTrain's future Arbutus Station:

https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/2096...-translink-pci











Looks amazing. Secondary station entrance. Activated Arbutus Greenway. Retail and public spaces. Translink doing things right.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted May 17, 2023, 9:18 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 21,693
Solid all around.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 2:42 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,588
Not sure if this is new or not

794 E Broadway

https://www.cushmanwakefield.com/en/...ast-broadway-s
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted May 27, 2023, 9:22 PM
gaviscon gaviscon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 245
2511 Spruce

[IMG]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2023, 7:46 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,280
Must cost a lot to change the previous shorter version to the current taller tower. All the charges will definitely go into the overall cost.

Eg. 1296 West Broadway (Previously Denny's Restaurant)
Previous:
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/1296...dway-vancouver
Current:
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/2538...wer-bc-housing

Still glad the tower is a lot taller now though, but love the previous brick cladding and overall design better. Should've stuck with this scheme.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2023, 9:30 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Must cost a lot to change the previous shorter version to the current taller tower. All the charges will definitely go into the overall cost.
The design change will be a drop in the bucket because the site is now worth more as a 28-storey tower rather than what its valuation would have been as a 16-storey.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2023, 12:53 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,687
Rezoning application is up for the PCI & Translink tower at Arbutus.

https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/2096-w-...576-arbutus-st

-260 rental units, 20% below market
-11.4 FSR
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2023, 3:38 PM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant
Posts: 6,866
No reason to have a paltry 30 story height limit here. Not in a view cone, and there is no park nearby where shadowing would be a concern. City Hall has this huge back log, so it would be in their best interest to have a taller tower with more units go through the arduous rezoning process. More units in one project is a more efficient use of the limited labour pool as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2023, 2:17 AM
MistyMountain MistyMountain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 71
Proposal for 24-storey office tour a block east of Granville and Broadway

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2023, 2:48 AM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,191
Quote:
Originally Posted by MistyMountain View Post
Proposal for 24-storey office tour a block east of Granville and Broadway

Link to the Shape Your City page for the current concept
https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/1395-w-broadway-2

This redesign comes two years after the original May 2021 application was unanimously "requested" to resubmit by the Urban Design Panel. I'll be curious to see what they think of the podium, as the north and west facades now look completely different from the rest of the design.

Link for the previous iteration
https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/1395-w-broadway

The panel's previous recommendations
Quote:
1. Provide a more responsive public realm on all three sides each responding to the unique character of each street.
2. Design development to the tower expression to show a more realistic and approachable form.
3. Design development to the materiality and expression of the podium to respond more directly to the existing Fairview slopes character and the emerging character of. Broadway street.
pg 10
https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/udp-minutes-10272021.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2023, 2:53 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,687
^







Images from Andrew Cheung Architects
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2023, 6:36 AM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend View Post
Link to the Shape Your City page for the current concept
https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/1395-w-broadway-2

This redesign comes two years after the original May 2021 application was unanimously "requested" to resubmit by the Urban Design Panel. I'll be curious to see what they think of the podium, as the north and west facades now look completely different from the rest of the design.

Link for the previous iteration
https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/1395-w-broadway

The panel's previous recommendations


pg 10
https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/udp-minutes-10272021.pdf
I too would be curious to see how the UDP responds to this submission.

It doesn't seem like they responded substantively (IMO) to the panel's three recommendations other than the redesign of the podium to try to fit the "character" of the existing three public facing streets.

It also feels like they were stuck somewhere between what they feel they need to, or had to do (vis-a-vis UDP's recommendations) versus what they wanted to do such that they end up with this mishmash of a sort of modern tower sitting on and getting smashed into a kind of 1980's/90's designed podium (...that is, after all, the character of Broadway at least since most of the neighbouring buildings were built in that time period), which just makes for a fussy Frankenstein monster of redesign that's of two minds and no clear conviction of its own identity.

Again,...in my humble opinion.

There's just seems like there's too much going on, and all fighting with each other, rather than working in concert.
The vertical fins on some faces of the tower; vertical fins staggered for some reason; a podium grid that seems like it's lazily trying to ape/fit in with the neighbour building; and canopy's on the West 8th side that look like they're trying to be a kind of Alberni high-street-esque vibe on a side and facing street of the building that's anything but,...(Alberni).

In other words, a jangly mishmash of disparate elements all fighting for attention giving no clear identity or character to the whole.

I suspect it will eventually get passed through and permitted (after some back-and-forth push and pull) because the City would much prefer to have office buildings and employment centers built in close proximity to what will likely be a major transit hub once the Skytrain extension is completed, rather than not.

It's such a pity because such a corner could have used a more iconic and landmark design of a tower.

Not this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2023, 1:44 PM
city guy city guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
I too would be curious to see how the UDP responds to this submission.

It doesn't seem like they responded substantively (IMO) to the panel's three recommendations other than the redesign of the podium to try to fit the "character" of the existing three public facing streets.

It also feels like they were stuck somewhere between what they feel they need to, or had to do (vis-a-vis UDP's recommendations) versus what they wanted to do such that they end up with this mishmash of a sort of modern tower sitting on and getting smashed into a kind of 1980's/90's designed podium (...that is, after all, the character of Broadway at least since most of the neighbouring buildings were built in that time period), which just makes for a fussy Frankenstein monster of redesign that's of two minds and no clear conviction of its own identity.

Again,...in my humble opinion.

There's just seems like there's too much going on, and all fighting with each other, rather than working in concert.
The vertical fins on some faces of the tower; vertical fins staggered for some reason; a podium grid that seems like it's lazily trying to ape/fit in with the neighbour building; and canopy's on the West 8th side that look like they're trying to be a kind of Alberni high-street-esque vibe on a side and facing street of the building that's anything but,...(Alberni).

In other words, a jangly mishmash of disparate elements all fighting for attention giving no clear identity or character to the whole.

I suspect it will eventually get passed through and permitted (after some back-and-forth push and pull) because the City would much prefer to have office buildings and employment centers built in close proximity to what will likely be a major transit hub once the Skytrain extension is completed, rather than not.

It's such a pity because such a corner could have used a more iconic and landmark design of a tower.

Not this.
completely agree with you...tryign to do so many things..amish-mash of cliche ideas
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2023, 5:59 PM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,281
the UDP is a menace to the CoV at this point.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2023, 6:23 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 5,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
the UDP is a menace to the CoV at this point.
Huh? So the previous two posts suggest the UDP comments were correct about the office tower, and that the new version only addresses one of their three points - and you conclude the UDP is 'a menace'. Weird.

(I think the revised version maybe addresses two of the UDP points, although not particularly successfully, but it'll be interesting to see what the current UDP think. It's probably not really holding anything up, the developers are unlikely to be in any hurry to build 300,000 sf of office here anytime soon).
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:55 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.