Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Posted Jun 4, 2017, 11:03 PM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 7,477
Banished Brutalism: Death knells abound for building style

Updated May 12, 2017 1:25 a.m. ET

PROVIDENCE, R.I. — When an exposed concrete subway vault near the U.S. Capitol was painted white this spring, riders rejoiced at the brightened Washington Metro station. But some preservationists were unhappy, complaining that a "cardinal rule" of the Brutalist style was broken.

Brutalism, which got its name from a French word for raw concrete, has been sparking public battles ever since the architectural style flourished in the 1960s and 1970s, spawning buildings from Boston to Belgrade.

Now, the era's aging structures are being declared eyesores and slated for demolition in cities around the world. Or, as in Washington's Union Station, their austere features have been softened.

. . . Structures headed for imminent demolition include an office building in York, England. A church in Atlanta was razed this spring, and the McKeldin Fountain near Baltimore's Inner Harbor disappeared this year. Structural problems can also hasten their death. Earthquake concerns in the San Francisco Bay Area doomed architect Mario Ciampi's landmark Berkeley Art Museum, which remains vacant and has been replaced with a new museum nearby.

For all the Brutalist buildings that go down without a fight, a few get a loving farewell. In downtown Providence, kazoo-playing mourners recently held a funeral procession and gave eulogies as demolition crews prepared to tear down the John E. Fogarty Building, built as a government welfare office in the 1960s . . . .

Not everyone thinks the Brutalist style is ugly. In Sydney, Australia, tenants of a public housing high-rise overlooking the harbor and the city's opera house have been fighting to protect the terraced building by getting it listed on a historical registry. A chain-link fence was erected this week as both sides await a court ruling that could decide what happens next.

"True Brutalism is at once elegant and sexy," wrote a columnist defending the building in The Sydney Morning Herald last year. "It's a style that esteems strength and raw honesty, but especially as juxtaposed against the delicacy of glass, the sway and spike of nature, the play of light."

It's not an accident that Brutalist buildings are often public, from DC's forbidding FBI headquarters, which is likely fated for demolition, to housing complexes in Europe and college campuses, city halls and county administration offices throughout the United States.

"A lot of them were sort of left-leaning, very progressive and interested in creating a new style that was in opposition to the high modernism that you saw on Park Avenue," Angell Brown said . . . .

There's hope for some Brutalist buildings, including a vacant office tower designed by famous architect Marcel Breuer that looms over Interstate 95 in New Haven, Connecticut . . . . Ikea, which owns the property, is allowing artists to use the building as a pop-up exhibit this summer and is entertaining proposals from developers who want to creatively refurbish the building . . . .

Reply With Quote
Old Posted Jun 14, 2017, 2:52 AM
geomorph's Avatar
geomorph geomorph is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Newport Beach
Posts: 1,542
Here are a few images of the McKeldin Fountain mentioned in the article as having "disappeared" this year:

All photos taken by geomorph in 2008.
Reply With Quote
Old Posted Aug 31, 2017, 3:07 PM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is offline
Ex Houstonian
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oakland, Pittsburgh
Posts: 11,558
Most Brutalist architecture should be destroyed in my opinion. Especially on college campuses, many which were ruined by huge brutalist libraries and other such horrifyingly ugly and monotonous piles of Brutal garbage. The only Brutalist architecture I've ever liked is the D.C. subways.
Reply With Quote
Old Posted Sep 2, 2017, 8:31 PM
The North One's Avatar
The North One The North One is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,293
Originally Posted by photoLith View Post
Most Brutalist architecture should be destroyed in my opinion. Especially on college campuses, many which were ruined by huge brutalist libraries and other such horrifyingly ugly and monotonous piles of Brutal garbage. The only Brutalist architecture I've ever liked is the D.C. subways.
The DC subways are awesome, so are Montreal's. People forget that the Transamerica Pyramid is also Brutalist, so is the Ren Cen, Peachtree Plaza and Bonaventure Hotel.
Spawn of questionable parentage!
Reply With Quote
Old Posted Sep 2, 2017, 11:53 PM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,567
I kind of have a hard on for brutalism. I'll concede that there are some appallingly offensive brutalist buildings, but there are also countless other truly dramatic and fascinating examples. It's a style that allows for so much uniqueness and creativity.

River City (Chicago) (take by me)

Geisel Library

Reply With Quote
Old Posted Sep 3, 2017, 12:19 AM
Urbana's Avatar
Urbana Urbana is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago - Hyde Park
Posts: 561
Brutalism is one of my absolute favorite styles of architecture.

Unfortunately, it seems to be a trend in society's treatment of architecture that current buildings are considered to be new and exciting; buildings of the last "generation" are considered outdated, and ugly; and buildings more than two "generations" old are considered to be classics worth preservation - a renewed interest that arrises when "outdated" gives way to a collective nostalgia.

Brutalism and other Modernist styles now suffer from being in this valley of limited public appreciation. Compounding this issue is the fact that, now that these buildings are about 40-60 years old, they are getting old enough that they are in need of some sprucing up.

We have to be very careful that we don't make the same mistakes of the past. In all of our cities we are all too familiar with horrible examples of the destruction of unappreciated classics that, at that time, suffered from the same lack of appreciation/upkeep brutalism suffers from today.

Perhaps I am wrong, but in the next decade or two I believe brutalism will be looked at very differently - it is already thoroughly appreciated in the architecture community.

I would also point out that almost universally, I find that brutalist structures look immeasurably better in person than in pictures. Regardless, here is what I consider a great example of what can happen when a great brutalist structure is restored with respect for the original architect's vision.

Boston University Law Tower - Josep Lluis Sert (a greatly under-appreciated master) - 1965

From this Article (with many more pictures)
Reply With Quote
Old Posted Sep 3, 2017, 8:29 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
you suck
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: down the street from the taco trailer
Posts: 47,057
I don't know, I have a soft spot for brutalism. It sort of reminds me of a modern take on gothic architecture. It has the bulk that gothic architecture has without all of the facade detail and fancy windows.
Hear me. And if I close my mind in fear, please pry it open. - Metallica
Reply With Quote

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.