Top 10 Millionaire Counties

[bobdreamz]

*TNS Financial Services, a market research and polling firm, ranks the nation's top 10 counties with the highest number of millionaire households, which have a net worth of at least $1 million, not including the value of a resident's home.

http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/...ies/index.html

No. 1
Los Angeles County, California
Number of millionaire households: 268,138
Percentage of state's millionaire households: 23%
Percentage of nation's millionaire households: 3%

No. 2
Cook County, Illinois
Number of millionaire households: 171,118
Percentage of state's millionaire households: 40%
Percentage of nation's millionaire households: 2%

No. 3
Orange County, California
Number of millionaire households: 116,157
Percentage of state's millionaire households: 10%
Percentage of nation's millionaire households: 1%

No. 4
Maricopa County, Arizona
Number of millionaire households: 113,414
Percentage of state's millionaire households: 62%
Percentage of nation's millionaire households: 1%

No. 5
San Diego County, California
Number of millionaire households: 102,138
Percentage of state's millionaire households: 9%
Percentage of nation's millionaire households: 1%

No. 6
Harris County, Texas
Number of millionaire households: 99,504
Percentage of state's millionaire households: 16%
Percentage of nation's millionaire households: 1%

No. 7
Nassau County, New York
Number of millionaire households: 79,704
Percentage of state's millionaire households: 13%
Percentage of nation's millionaire households: 1%

No. 8
Santa Clara County, California
Number of millionaire households: 74,824
Percentage of state's millionaire households: 6%
Percentage of nation's millionaire households: 1%

No. 9
Palm Beach County, Florida
Number of millionaire households: 71,221
Percentage of state's millionaire households: 11%
Percentage of nation's millionaire households: 1%

No. 10
King County, Washington
Number of millionaire households: 68,390
Percentage of state's millionaire households: 33%
Percentage of nation's millionaire households: 1%

[tackledspoon]

If it was done by percentage, I'm pretty sure that Morris County, NJ, where I grew up would be on this list. I'm most surprised by the lack of Manhattan, though.

[Jersey Mentality]

^ many NJ counties would be on the list, like Bergen, Passaic, maybe Essex

[trvlr70]

I'm now understanding who is buying all the residential that's spurring Chicago's downtown highrise boom.

[Chicago103]

Originally Posted by trvlr70

I'm now understanding who is buying all the residential that's spurring Chicago's downtown highrise boom.

On a per capita basis Cook County doesnt have any more millinaires than just about anywhere else since roughly 2% of the nation's and 40% of the state's population lives in the county and thats the same as the percentage of millionaires.

[trvlr70]

Originally Posted by Chicago103

On a per capita basis Cook County doesnt have any more millinaires than just about anywhere else since roughly 2% of the nation's and 40% of the state's population lives in the county and thats the same as the percentage of millionaires.

But just the the raw numbers would explain.

[arbeiter]

Los Angeles is an interesting case, because it's both a very populous county and also has a large raw number of millionaires.

Harris County is perhaps the most interesting of all, because not only is it very populous, but being a millionaire in Houston is like being a multi millionaire in LA. You can live very handsomely on a relatively modest income there. So I would say Harris County has to be the bang-for-buck winner. $1 million buys you a shack in Santa Clara county, in Houston it buys you a bona fide pre-war mansion or mansionette, 3 luxury high-rise 1 bedroom apartments, or, if you're tacky, a McMansion with acreage galore, 3 car garages, 6 or 7 bedrooms, a circular driveway, etc.

Also, New York County (Manhattan) is only like 1.5 million people.

[mhays]

To me, "living handsomely" requires more than my own home. The neighborhood has to be good too, especially the public realm. So, to me, the expensive cities actually do have bang for the buck.

[Rusty van Reddick]

This list is worthless. The largest counties by population will have the largest numbers of milionaires. There is no standardization here and therefore this tells us nothing.

[bobdreamz]

^ how is this list worthless?...it points out where most millionaires live in the US and it seems they choose to live in major metropolitan areas.

[spoonman]

No offense but it always puzzles me how Phoenix has a large concentration of millionaires...

[PHX602]

It shouldn't be too difficult to figure out...North Scottsdale. You're probably just puzzled because it landed on top of SD.

[arbeiter]

Yeah it's Scottsdale. It's like putting Jackson Hole next to the city limits of Las Vegas or something...

[trebuchet]

maricopa county also is the 4th largest county in the US, so not surprisingly there are some millionaires.

[jhennie]

nice info this is a accurate?

[JDRCRASH]

I'm not suprised that L.A. County tops all. Remember, within it's boundaries is Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, BelAir Estates, Malibu Hills and other Super High-end Gated Communities.

Then you have Orange County; in that area you have San Juan Capistrano, Dana Point, Laguna Beach, and Newport Beach.

Plus California has more Millionaires than anywhere else in the Country; hence many of it's counties are on the list.

[dollaztx]

I agree with furrycanuck. Its obvious that the largest counties for the most part will lead the list. There are small counties that have a greater ratio of millionairs that wouldnt make the list simply because of thier size. I think it would tell us more if it were calculated by the ratio of millionaires to non-millionaires.

[Gordo]

Originally Posted by bobdreamz

^ how is this list worthless?...it points out where most millionaires live in the US and it seems they choose to live in major metropolitan areas.

It doesn't show you that at all - it simply shows you which major metropolitan areas have very few counties. I would be much more surprised if the two largest counties in the US by far (LA County and Cook County) didn't have the most millionaires. The only thing interesting about this list are the ten largest by population counties that are left OFF of the list.

[seaskyfan]

Looking at the number of millionaires rather than the % of millionaires does seem kind of odd.

FYI - From the July 2006 estimates the ones on the population top 10 list that aren't on this list are Kings (NY), Queens (NY), Miami-Dade (FL), and Dallas (TX).

The ones that aren't in the top 10 for population on the estimates list that show up on this list are King (WA) - #14 on estimate list, Santa Clara (CA) - #17 on estimate list, Palm Beach (FL) - #29 on the estimate list, and Nassau (NY) at #27.

http://www.census.gov/popest/countie...ST2006-07.html

[JDRCRASH]

Originally Posted by Gordo

It doesn't show you that at all - it simply shows you which major metropolitan areas have very few counties. I would be much more surprised if the two largest counties in the US by far (LA County and Cook County) didn't have the most millionaires. The only thing interesting about this list are the ten largest by population counties that are left OFF of the list.

In land size, or population? In pop., correct, Los Angeles County is easily the most populous, because New York City is not a county; hence the boroughs. In total land size, however, no......it is San Bernardino County.