HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 9:06 PM
clooless clooless is offline
Registered Luser
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by cornholio View Post
I guess only time will tell but I completely agree with you clooless about not getting to excited about this announcement and thinking its a done deal, we took a big step right now in the right direction but theres many more to take to actually get this done.
Thanks.

I am not trying to be a killjoy here, but an awful lot of this plan is contingent on the federal government providing a good chunk of funding, and we've heard nothing in that regard.

Still, I am excited and optimistic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 9:07 PM
cornholio cornholio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,911
Only time will tell, i look back at other announcements in the past few decades and know that something like this is far from being done. Im not sure if the Canada lines price tag has even been included in this 14billion but I guess these being politicians they will sneak its price tag in to everything and anything they can to make it apear as if they keep spending billions more then they really are. The Evergreen line has had only a small percentage of its costs committed by the feds. Anyways im not trying to be a pessimist but you have to understand that this is big and complicated and hisory will show you that its rare for a mega project such as this too actually go through as planed and on schedule is unlikely. But I really hope this all works out and more. Yes im also exited and optimistic, but i just dont want to set my self up for yet another disappointment knowing full well the challenges that lay ahead for all this to go through.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 9:15 PM
Stingray2004's Avatar
Stingray2004 Stingray2004 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: White Rock, BC (Metro Vancouver)
Posts: 3,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by clooless View Post
Has the federal government committed to providing the 3.1 billion dollars necessary for this plan to actually be implemented?
Firstly, this transit strategy is over the next 12-year period to 2020.

Last November the feds announced that BC would be receiving $2.2 billion in federal infrastructure funding over the next 7 years from the Building Canada Fund.

Additional federal strategic infrastructure programs also exist.

I'd wager that $3.1 billion in federal funding over the next 12 years won't be too hard to come by and those fed decisions are typically made prior to the so-called "first shovel the ground".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 9:16 PM
Overground's Avatar
Overground Overground is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 903
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x2 View Post
- $3.1 billion to double capacity on the existing
Expo Line,
including major improvements to
stations starting in 2009
and a 6 kilometre
extension in Surrey by 2020.
Improvements will
include lengthening platforms to handle 6 car
trains,
additional storage track, upgrades to the
control system, vehicle storage depots, maintenance
facilities and adjacent transit exchanges.

- $1 billion for new rail cars
I thought current platforms already handle 6-car trains, don't they mean 8+ cars? Either way, doubling Expo's capacity is awesome!

That 6km stretch then will bring the extension to Fleetwood on the Fraser Hwy and 160th. As pointed out, it will be interesting exactly what route they will take to get it there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 9:51 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,309
Joining the thread late! but nice to see!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Overground View Post
I thought current platforms already handle 6-car trains, don't they mean 8+ cars? Either way, doubling Expo's capacity is awesome!

That 6km stretch then will bring the extension to Fleetwood on the Fraser Hwy and 160th. As pointed out, it will be interesting exactly what route they will take to get it there.
I think they mean 6-car MKII trains (hopefully the Main Street renos will accommodate this, as the plans shown in the RFP suggested an escalator very close to the edge of the platform). Hopefully they'll buy some "C" cars since having more trains means you don't need the flexibility of constantly separating all of the trains.

Evergreen Line - interesting that they show the NW allignment - that leaves the door open for Skytrain (esp. with $1.4B allocated to it - i.e. Trnaslink has some allocated already, right?). A SE allignment would probably have started near Braid and eliminated Skytrain in favour of connectivity over the Port Mann Bridge. In the very long run, if Ecervgreen is Skytrain, the SE route could still be built out as an LRT to Braid. With the Skytrain expansions, and the bulk purchase of lots of new vehicles, maybe that would favour the Evergreen as Skytrain.

Agreed that the Surrey route should be interesting. Good news that they are tying in Guildford Town Centre (though I could be wrong looking at the map). Route may be along hydro ROW (tail track is just above the words Fraser Hwy in pic below) then along 100th Ave (north side of Green Timbers Park) to Guildford. It would be a shame if they miss Guildford by a few blocks along 96th (although the LRT is planned to run along 104th to Guildford, but would that be axed?).




Last edited by officedweller; Jan 14, 2008 at 10:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 10:03 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Man View Post
What a scam. Once again Vancouver gets the goods and Victoria gets squat.

Anyone want a bet on the breakdown of the spending?

I am betting 80% on the Lower Mainland, 20% for the rest of the province.

which makes sense given the % in those areas.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 10:25 PM
quobobo quobobo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,053
That's a huge amount of money, but at least Vancouver proper is finally seeing more rapid transit. It always kind of irks me that I take the bus while my friends in Burnaby get the Skytrain.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 10:33 PM
clooless clooless is offline
Registered Luser
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by quobobo View Post
That's a huge amount of money, but at least Vancouver proper is finally seeing more rapid transit. It always kind of irks me that I take the bus while my friends in Burnaby get the Skytrain.
And free ice cream.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 10:33 PM
vitc's Avatar
vitc vitc is offline
mAd cRaZy CoDeR
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kelowna, BC
Posts: 357
Re: Federal Dollars - don't forget an election is coming later this year and the dollars always flow at election time. And even if the Liberals do win a minority ( god help us if Dion wins 8-((( ) I doubt they would kill the dollars in fear of alienating the west and their Kyoto stance.

For the UBC line - any mention which is preferred ( above or below or both )...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 10:42 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,309
Quote:
Originally Posted by vitc View Post
For the UBC line - any mention which is preferred ( above or below or both )...
It is pretty well acknowledged that it would be underground - probably under 10th Ave. Not sure what happens west of Blanca @ UBC.

**********

WRT routing in Surrey, this is interesting from CKNW:

Quote:
Transportation minister Kevin Falcon is looking southeast
Jan, 14 2008 - 8:50 AM

VANCOUVER/CKNW(AM980) - Never mind that anything has been sorted out fully for the expansion of rapid transit with the Evergreen Line to Coquitlam, transportation minister Kevin Falcon is looking southeast.
While answering caller's questions on CKNW’s Bill Good show this morning, Falcon defended the twinning of the Port Mann Bridge as a means improving transportation flow.

He says that includes buses, possibly rapid transit later, but first

"What would make a lot more sense is actually taking the existing Skytrain in Surrey and extending that down to pickup Langley and the balance of Surrey, particularly the southern part and also maybe running a line up into Guildford, but running a line across the Port Mann at this point in time doesn't make sense"

Falcon says Skytrain could be extended to Langley by going right along the Fraser Highway.

He says his personal goal is to do that within ten years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 10:44 PM
Canadian Mind's Avatar
Canadian Mind Canadian Mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,921
hmm, for the Slurrey (:p) extension, it could run along 96th and then turn north towards Guilford once it passes that park. That would keep it near the more dense parts of Surrey and areas that can be really densified, rather than just sprawl along 104th. I also think it would be curious to see how they integrate the station with Guilford Mall, if they choose to go there. Would be kinda neat to have the station built into the mall.

At the same time, running along 96th they miss the giant Superstore, which while not that big of a deal, is still slightly saddening. I don't have a problem with big box stores as long as they are served by transit, this is a BIG big-box store, and as such should be served by large volume transit, in addition to the parking lot it has.

As for the UBC run, keep it underground until you get to the university.
__________________
"you're eating chicken periods" - Vid
"I love eggs, especially the ones with runny yolks" - Me
"EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, you're disgusting!" - Vid
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 10:52 PM
Overground's Avatar
Overground Overground is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 903
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
I think they mean 6-car MKII trains.

Agreed that the Surrey route should be interesting. Good news that they are tying in Guildford Town Centre (though I could be wrong looking at the map). Route may be along hydro ROW (tail track is just above the words Fraser Hwy in pic below) then along 100th Ave (north side of Green Timbers Park) to Guildford. It would be a shame if they miss Guildford by a few blocks along 96th (although the LRT is planned to run along 104th to Guildford, but would that be axed?).
Doh...I wasn't thinking MKII cars...I have a cold...lol.

I was thinking that too that it could swing up where the hydro lines are and along 100th with some expropriations along the way. And how would it route through 100th and 152nd to head south? Definitely a shame if Skytrain got left out of Guildford since it goes to every other major shopping mall. Exciting times ahead to see how this will pan out!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 10:54 PM
The Geographer The Geographer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 310
Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Man View Post
Skewed is to put it mildly. A cursory glance at the news release puts it close to 90% in the Lower mainland.

6 billion on RT in Vancouver.
10 million on a BRT line in Victoria.

Yup seems fair.
Bus systems have much lower capital costs, but much higher future variable costs that I doubt are being factored into this equation. Thus the spending on all the bus systems are underestimated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 10:54 PM
quobobo quobobo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
It is pretty well acknowledged that it would be underground - probably under 10th Ave.
Does anyone else think this is going to be very strange between, say Arbutus and UBC? It's a really quiet residential area that's still mainly quaint freestanding homes. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of NIMBYs opposed it, especially in Point Grey.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 11:04 PM
Canadian Mind's Avatar
Canadian Mind Canadian Mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,921
Quote:
Originally Posted by quobobo View Post
Does anyone else think this is going to be very strange between, say Arbutus and UBC? It's a really quiet residential area that's still mainly quaint freestanding homes. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of NIMBYs opposed it, especially in Point Grey.
Fuck em.



Anyways, if the conservatives pledge to help funding these transit initiatives, they'd win alot of green and student votes in this city, which they desperately need if they want more seats in this city.
__________________
"you're eating chicken periods" - Vid
"I love eggs, especially the ones with runny yolks" - Me
"EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, you're disgusting!" - Vid
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 11:09 PM
bils's Avatar
bils bils is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 563
Quote:
Originally Posted by quobobo View Post
Does anyone else think this is going to be very strange between, say Arbutus and UBC? It's a really quiet residential area that's still mainly quaint freestanding homes. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of NIMBYs opposed it, especially in Point Grey.
they'd have to go underground there. as much as we're against NIMBYism, we still have to respect the livability of a neighborhood. don't get me wrong, i live nowhere near point grey - but i still respect the impact of an overhead track on pedestrian life in the area
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #77  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 11:10 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,023
a lot of those quaint free-standing homes have up to 10 people in them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #78  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 11:29 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Rethinking about what has been announced today, a lot of these are already in the works...really, a lot of it is nothing new: we've known about the M-Line extension to UBC for ages, same with the Evergreen Line. The only thing that's remotely new is the Surrey SkyTrain extension, the rapid bus fleet, etc.

What's welcoming i guess is it's "official, or rather "officially announced", with a timeline and a budget.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #79  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 11:33 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,023
Yeah... what's new is that it's the government that is behind this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #80  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 11:35 PM
clooless clooless is offline
Registered Luser
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by bils View Post
they'd have to go underground there. as much as we're against NIMBYism, we still have to respect the livability of a neighborhood. don't get me wrong, i live nowhere near point grey - but i still respect the impact of an overhead track on pedestrian life in the area
I agree. They're going to have to bury the line along that section, depending on the route, of course.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x2 View Post
Rethinking about what has been announced today, a lot of these are already in the works...really, a lot of it is nothing new: we've known about the M-Line extension to UBC for ages, same with the Evergreen Line. The only thing that's remotely new is the Surrey SkyTrain extension, the rapid bus fleet, etc.

What's welcoming i guess is it's "official, or rather "officially announced", with a timeline and a budget.
I thought we also knew about the Victoria Rapidbus project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:51 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.