HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2007, 3:24 PM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
City of Austin wants to hold off on Intel demolition

Whether the unfinished Intel building in downtown Austin will be demolished at the end of the month is still up in the air.

Plans were announced Tuesday to tear down the structure on Feb. 25. The building frame has become a downtown eyesore since construction stopped in February 2001.

The plan is to build a new $65 million federal courthouse at the site. But since downtown property is so hot right now, Mayor Will Wynn is considering holding off on the demolition to sell it to a private developer.

"What we're asking the federal government to do is to simply give us 90 days to explore other options, because that site is incredibly valuable as a redevelopment opportunity with the existing concrete pillars in place," Austin City Council member Brewster McCracken said.


The city wants to hold off on the implosion for 90 days to see if selling to a private developer is possible.



One downtown developer said the land alone is worth more than $10 million. If the building becomes a new federal courthouse as planned, the city won't see any tax money.

"If it's torn down there is millions of dollars of potential value to the taxpayers that is lost imminently," McCracken said.

U.S. Congressman Lloyd Doggett was instrumental in bringing the courthouse to the abandoned site beginning in 2003.

"It will be uphill to get this reversed and an alternative considered," he said.


News 8 Austin plans to air the implosion live at 7 a.m. on Sunday, Feb. 25.


But that was when downtown development was slow.

"I certainly can't see any harm as slow as the GSA [General Services Administration] has been, to taking a few more weeks to consider all the alternatives," Doggett said.

At least one developer has made an informal offer to buy the lot at Fifth Street and San Antonio, according to McCracken.
City leaders say an alternative site for the courthouse would be the Town Lake Animal Center on West Cesar Chavez after they move in a few years. Thanks to last year’s bond election, the 50-year-old animal shelter will be moved to a new $12 million, 40,000-square-foot facility on the Health and Human Services campus on Airport Boulevard.

But, the decision will be up to the federal government, since they own the land and the building.


“When the U.S. General Services Administration purchased the Intel site almost four years ago, the city and Downtown Alliance were very grateful that we could provide a positive solution to a critical problem they had downtown. With the overwhelming support we’ve received over the years from our customers, the city and the community, we’ve made great strides in advancing this project for the taxpayers.

To turn back now would cost the taxpayers millions of additional dollars, deprive the citizens of their badly needed new courthouse for at least two more years, and could potentially jeopardize the construction funding in the future.

GSA has received no communication requesting or suggesting a change in course for this critical project. We did recently receive an unsolicited offer to buy the site which, quite frankly, we did not deem to be a serious offer given the financial and time commitment the federal taxpayers have already invested in the new courthouse.

We certainly understand the city’s desire for more economic development. However, to request that the federal government shut down a courthouse project that is this far along and start over is just not possible.

This United States Courthouse project has been in the works for over 10 years. The site was acquired almost four years ago and the design is well underway for this current site. With all the millions of taxpayer dollars already in site acquisition, design and plans for the implosion, it would be fiscally irresponsible to start over now. Therefore, we are proceeding as planned and will hold the implosion as scheduled,” said Scott Armey, Regional Administrator for the U.S. General Services Administration.

http://news8austin.com/content/your_...sp?ArID=178877
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2007, 4:34 PM
Mikey711MN's Avatar
Mikey711MN Mikey711MN is offline
I am so smart, S-M-R-T!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Moved south to Austin, TX
Posts: 646
Judge: No sale on courthouse site
Wynn sought delay of Intel shell demolition

By Kate Alexander
AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
Friday, February 09, 2007

No reprieve will be coming from Austin's federal judges for the forlorn Intel Corp. shell scheduled for demolition this month to make room for a U.S. courthouse.

Mayor Will Wynn had been lobbying to delay the Feb. 25 demolition so a possible sale could be discussed for the slice of prime real estate at Fifth and San Antonio streets. Private developers last month offered $13 million for the site, but that offer was rejected this week.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew Austin, who met with Wynn on Thursday, said changing course now would cause an unacceptable delay for the $65 million courthouse project. The federal judicial leadership has a say in the courthouse plans, as does the U.S. General Services Administration, which manages property for federal agencies.

Wynn agreed that finding a new site for the courthouse and restarting the design process were not feasible. The Austin project would essentially go to the end of the line behind dozens of other federal courthouse projects, whereas now it is near the top of the list, he said.

The General Services Administration estimates that money could be budgeted in 2009 for the courthouse, which would be complete by 2012.

Though disappointed, Wynn said too much time, money and land would be wasted in pursuit of another courthouse site. More than one city block would be needed to meet federal security guidelines. At the current site, Republic Square Park provides the necessary buffer from street traffic.

Wynn and other downtown supporters had shared a giddy vision of stopping the demolition so a private developer could buy the shell, a vestige of the technology bust, and erect a high-rise development. Then, the federal government could have used the money from that sale to find a more suitable site for the courthouse.

The $13 million offer for the property was made in January by Novare Group Holdings and Andrews Urban LLC, the development team putting a mixed-use project on the nearby downtown post office site, but the federal agency overseeing the courthouse project rejected that offer.

The deal with the U.S. Postal Service involves a swap of its downtown site at Fifth and Guadalupe streets for a new home a block west. In its place, the developers plan to put a 40-story mixed-use tower. No such land trade was offered for the courthouse site.

The federal agency did not seriously consider the offer because of the time and money already committed to the courthouse site, Scott Armey, regional administrator for the General Services Administration, said in a news release issued Wednesday.

For a price comparison, the winning proposal for the city-owned Block 21, which is across the street from City Hall, was $15 million in 2005, although Stratus Properties Inc. is paying about $10 million because it is providing a home for the Austin Children's Museum.

Representatives from Novare and Andrews Urban either could not be reached or refused to comment.

Armey said the city was "very grateful that we could provide a positive solution to a critical problem they had downtown" when the federal government bought the Intel building skeleton, left unfinished in 2001 when the technology bust forced Intel to stop construction on the $124 million project.

"With all the millions of taxpayer dollars already spent in site acquisition, design and plans for the implosion, it would be fiscally irresponsible to start over now," Armey said.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2007, 5:02 PM
Saddle Man Saddle Man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,149
So, is anything going to happen to the old federal courthouse? Will this new one replace the old one, or will the old one just stick around?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2007, 5:52 PM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Does the city have some sort of eminent domain? Can't we just take it away from them? They did it while building 183....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2007, 7:01 PM
M1EK's Avatar
M1EK M1EK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,194
Uh, in the battle of eminent domain, the Feds trump the city. Piss them off enough and they could condemn City Hall if they wanted to.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2007, 2:21 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin <------------> Birmingham?
Posts: 57,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingkirbythegreat View Post
So, is anything going to happen to the old federal courthouse? Will this new one replace the old one, or will the old one just stick around?
Either runover office space for the courthouse, or else sold off and used for private uses, commercial office space etc. It's not a large building, just 3 floors, but it is 70 odd years old, so I'd rather it not be torn down.
__________________
Conform or be cast out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:00 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.