Interesting. I wonder how feasible it is economically, though... if the rooftop stuff is more expensive than the stuff trucked in from the fields, then the rooftop stuff will always be some kind of niche curiosity product that people only buy because they have too much money.
Urban farming is a bit overrated in my view, especially if you have to erect giant structures and irrigation systems to make it work, or spend millions removing contamination from polluted urban lots, etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foley Santamaria
Also I've seen on the MCNO listserv folks complaining about there being too many apartments on Tulane Ave - so I wouldn't call it a no mans land.
|
I think that's just minor grumbling. Powerful NIMBY groups live in the neighborhoods they're concerned with. Since nobody really lives south of Tulane except the new apartment dwellers, the neighborhood can't form NIMBY groups unless the apartment dwellers adopt some kind of hypocritical position. Tulane is six lanes wide, which is more than enough to handle another 20 apartment complexes. Plus, each of them so far has included parking at a 1:1 ratio, which is perfectly adequate - there should be no serious demand for street parking except for visitors. This is ideal for the introduction of proper urban retail to the neighborhood, since new retail developments will not need their own parking unless they exceed a certain size.
I'm holding my breath for the massive Fontainebleau at Carrollton to come down. Down with the seedy motels! Put that ish out on Chef Hwy!