HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9921  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2014, 9:00 PM
tyleraf's Avatar
tyleraf tyleraf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 566
I'm glad to see UTC becoming more dense. Also, I'd love to see Faulconer become more aggressive with development. San Diego is one of the few major cities not going through a huge boom and that needs to change.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9922  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2014, 9:20 PM
nezbn22 nezbn22 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northparkwizard View Post
So Ron Roberts just tweeted this, "Looking forward to talking urban cable car transit today with James Haughey's @SDSU Senior Design Class."
While fun to fantasize about, projects like the aerial cable cars and the bike/pedestrian tube under the Coronado Bridge are soooo far from anything close to real possibilities.

I like Ron Roberts, but this is the perfect example of a termed out politician taking one last hail mary swing for the fence. He got the Waterfront Park done after years of fighting, though, so he's allowed one last whopper in my book.

I'm pretty sure I saw this idea floated somewhere, but I'd love to see someone go after an elevated walkway around downtown (copying New York's new High Line). You could slap it right on top of the trolley line running east on C St. from One American Plaza to City College and then down Park Blvd to the library/Petco/transit center.

The only obstacle I see is the old County courthouse that spans C St. between Union and Front. But that's scheduled for demolition once the new courthouse is built. It would create a mostly uninterrupted pedestrian loop around downtown if you combine it with the waterfront.

That's my swing for the fences fantasy project...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9923  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2014, 9:28 PM
spoonman's Avatar
spoonman spoonman is offline
SD/OC
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,430
I would rather see Ron Roberts do something about the Chargers stadium than good around with a carnival ride for downtown. I think this is a fun idea, but there are more pressing matters. Also, this should not be called "transit".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9924  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2014, 9:41 PM
staplesla staplesla is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by kpexpress View Post
were you at the DCPC meeting last night?
No my friend was, he's the one who shared the info with me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9925  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2014, 4:49 PM
SDfan's Avatar
SDfan SDfan is offline
Registered San Diegan
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by mello View Post
Can you go more in depth about what Garcetti is trying to do and why it isn't working? Like I said getting projects moving means jobs and more support for small business in the area which everyone seems to want to save.
First, his position:
http://www.latimes.com/business/real...029-story.html

Second, the reality he faces:
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/dec...-plan-20131212

http://www.latimes.com/local/cityhal...821-story.html

http://www.latimes.com/local/cityhal...ry.html#page=1

Quote:
It's the latest of several setbacks for the city as it seeks to remake Hollywood with a series of big developments. Two months ago, a judge halted construction of a 74-foot-tall Target shopping center on Sunset Boulevard, saying the city had improperly allowed the project to exceed a 35-foot height limit.

Another judge forced the City Council to rescind a controversial 2012 plan allowing for taller buildings near transit stops in Hollywood, concluding the council had relied on out-of-date population data.

Community groups also are waging a legal fight that has slowed the planned Millennium project, a pair of 35- and 39-story skyscrapers. Opponents contend an earthquake fault runs beneath the site and construction is on hold until the case is resolved.

Attorney Robert P. Silverstein, who represented the activists in all four legal battles, said Hollywood's aging infrastructure cannot handle the "densification" Garcetti is planning. Neighborhood groups who are suing, he said, simply want the city to follow the law


There are more cases in LA like these, which makes me realize how lucky we are compared to places like Hollywood or Santa Monica.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9926  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2014, 4:53 PM
SDfan's Avatar
SDfan SDfan is offline
Registered San Diegan
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoonman View Post
If it is 270 ft, it will be about 30% taller than Wells Fargo. I'm just not sure how a 16 story residential building is 270ft. Would be great though to have a new tallest. Hope the other 3 are taller also. Sucks these were almost 43, then 35 stories before being cut down by NIMBYs.
That height has to be wrong on the website, I'm sure it's below 200' by just looking at the rendering. I'm thinking the tallest structure will be 270' and they are mixing their height stats up with this rendering.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9927  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2014, 4:58 PM
SDfan's Avatar
SDfan SDfan is offline
Registered San Diegan
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by mello View Post
Yeah how can a 16 floor tower be 270 feet? So there is no way to bring back the proposals of the 34 to 43 floor towers? Those are dead and never to be revived, I thought that battle was a few years ago maybe they can get around it now?
The original proposal is long dead (like 2008 dead). I actually believe the developer proposed the bigger (scarier) development as a ploy to force the University City Planning Group to settle for a "smaller" project that had been the developers original goal.

I say 40 stories, you say 20 stories, I "concede" and we agree for 25 instead. Oh well! Looks like you all got me... (*runs to the bank*)

Not to say I don't like it when developers have to pull this tactic, but it sucks they have to maneuver in these ways to get things done.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9928  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2014, 5:03 PM
SDfan's Avatar
SDfan SDfan is offline
Registered San Diegan
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northparkwizard View Post
So Ron Roberts just tweeted this, "Looking forward to talking urban cable car transit today with James Haughey's @SDSU Senior Design Class."
I'm laughing if Ron Roberts thinks this is going to not only be built, but built quickly. It took them how many decades to build those parks at the admin building?

Lolololololololz. 2050, at the earliest!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9929  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2014, 8:53 PM
SDCAL SDCAL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 882
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoonman View Post
I would rather see Ron Roberts do something about the Chargers stadium than good around with a carnival ride for downtown. I think this is a fun idea, but there are more pressing matters. Also, this should not be called "transit".
I agree with you, minus the part about the Charger's stadium. Even IF this was something that could realistically be built, I don't think it should be. It's stupid. We are a city in desperate need of better reliable mass transit, and our public officials are floating around, as you aptly call it, "a carniaval ride".

SD does need local officials to think big, but the big thinking needs to be more along the lines of underground transit and putting light rail up Park Blvd to finally connect downtown to balboa park to mid-city with rail.

The last thing we need is a glorified ski-lift swirling around downtown. Even those renderings look comical. I don't mean to sound so negative, because Roberts is at least "thinking big" which I agree we need more politicians to do, but this idea just seems like the last thing we should be pushing for. There are so many other big things we need.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9930  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2014, 3:12 AM
rocksteady rocksteady is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by nezbn22 View Post
While fun to fantasize about, projects like the aerial cable cars and the bike/pedestrian tube under the Coronado Bridge are soooo far from anything close to real possibilities.

I like Ron Roberts, but this is the perfect example of a termed out politician taking one last hail mary swing for the fence. He got the Waterfront Park done after years of fighting, though, so he's allowed one last whopper in my book.

I'm pretty sure I saw this idea floated somewhere, but I'd love to see someone go after an elevated walkway around downtown (copying New York's new High Line). You could slap it right on top of the trolley line running east on C St. from One American Plaza to City College and then down Park Blvd to the library/Petco/transit center.

The only obstacle I see is the old County courthouse that spans C St. between Union and Front. But that's scheduled for demolition once the new courthouse is built. It would create a mostly uninterrupted pedestrian loop around downtown if you combine it with the waterfront.

That's my swing for the fences fantasy project...
I'd be for this if it were a privately funded venture and viewed as a project intended for tourism rather than looked at as an alternative mode of transportation that the city wastes its own time and money on. lol And if they wanted this to look like a cool, modern way of getting around town they could have at least used pods that don't look like leftovers from the People Mover at Disneyland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9931  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2014, 4:52 PM
nezbn22 nezbn22 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 136
On Saturday, I walked over to the grand opening of Phase I of the North Embarcadero Visionary Plan. It was a fun little event, but nothing to write home about. They aren't even really finished with it. They still need to knock down the dingy Bayside Cafe and install Carnitas Snack Shack. It's a very clear upgrade over what it replaced, but I thought the celebratory "completion" was a bit premature.

Also of note - I noticed a semi-permanent fence erected on the east side of Bosa's Pacific and Broadway lot. By "semi-permanent", I mean the poles are cemented into the ground, but it's still a chain-link fence with a covering over it (like something that would surround a construction site). Maybe they're getting ready to build?????
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9932  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2014, 6:40 PM
bushman61988's Avatar
bushman61988 bushman61988 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: National City
Posts: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtell04 View Post
I could only make it through about 6 comments. These people basically said: I got mine, fuck anyone else. I don't think they have any clue why housing is so expensive in SD.
This is almost verbatim what Environmental Attorney Marco Gonzalez said at the SD Housing Federation Conference last month: http://voiceofsandiego.org/2014/10/2...1076:228962372
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9933  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2014, 9:54 AM
aerogt3 aerogt3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtell04 View Post
I could only make it through about 6 comments. These people basically said: I got mine, fuck anyone else. I don't think they have any clue why housing is so expensive in CALIFORNIA.
FTFY. And by the way, these people exist everywhere. The difference is that in California they have loads of state environmental laws to hide behind and the coastal commission to help them block projects.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9934  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2014, 1:16 AM
travis bickle travis bickle is offline
silly slackergeek
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 470
Not a skyscraper story, but development related. I've seen some posts regarding the bureaucracy and how it makes building housing more difficult.

Here's a story that may interest some of you.

We just canceled a purchase on a project in Imperial Beach on SR-75.

Beautiful mixed-use by one of San Diego's leading architectural firms. 49 for sale units - 5600sf retail. Mix of 2/2.5 - 1/1.5 and lofts. Large units; very affordably priced with the 2bd units pro forma'd at $450k.

Project meets all local zoning regulations and in fact, the city loves it and had suggested a quick approval process of about 4 months remaining to permits (architects have been working with City over a year on this).

At present, site is vacant having been demo'ed in 2010 by owner. Here's where it gets interesting...

Site for 30 years was a flop-house motel that charged by the hour. Owner let it fall into disrepair and closed it in 2006 (last TOT records we could find). After it was closed, it became a haven for the homeless who moved in en masse. They absolutely trashed the place, eventually even using the inoperable toilets as fire places and stoves.

It was an absolute disaster for nearly four years. The city was constantly citing the owner and the Sherriff's Department was out there daily, often many times a day as the site deteriorated and became a magnet for everything ill associated with urban blight.

In response, owner bulldozed it in 2010, graded the land and the site has been empty since.

This project was everything the town wanted and needed.

Then the Coastal Commission became involved... Mind you, we had of course kept the CC informed of our plans the entire time. Staff had mentioned that there was a minor issue with the previous use, but that it shouldn't be critical and certainly not lethal. While the site is just outside of the Coastal Zone and the Commission has no legal jurisdiction, what is DOES have is the power to appeal the city's approval.

In our last meeting with the City, staff informed us that the Coastal Commission was no longer being so agreeable. Apparently, because the site used to be a motel, it had fulfilled one of the Commission's high priorities, that being low cost beach access. Never mind that the site is not on nor near any beach. It is on the inland side on SR-75, near a donut shop.

Remember, this was the proverbial flea-bag, Crack Ho Inn, but because housing near the coast is not a Commission priority, and "low-cost access" is, they found that by developing this badly needed housing in Imperial Beach, we were actually damaging the ability for low-income people to enjoy the coast.

Sooooo... if we wanted to proceed with their blessing, we were going to have to convert 24 of the for-sale units (same as number of rooms in old motel) into a low-cost hotel. They wouldn't even be satisfied with paying the in-lieu fee of about $30k/unit since most developers had chosen that route for other sites before and because of the restrictions on use if you tap that funding source (like any agreement is for... PERPETUITY), they had plenty of "in-lieu" money in the bank and didn't want to add anymore. Didn't matter really as that kind of hit killed the deal anyway, but it wasn't even an option.

This last-minute demand killed the deal. Absolutely.

Remember, the Coastal Commission didn't actually have any jurisdiction over the site. The city had the final say and very much wanted the project to move forward. But the Commission can appeal. And they told us, discretely, that after their review during the City's comment period, they most certainly WOULD appeal and that they would drag out the process for at least two more years.

Money can't wait two additional years...

So we canceled our PSA and the project is officially dead.

Your tax dollars at work!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9935  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2014, 3:06 AM
Derek Derek is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 9,540
Why can't anybody tell the Coastal Commission to just shut the f*** up? Why do people feel obligated to appeal to them, despite the fact that they had no jurisdiction? What's in it for the City of Imperial Beach to cave in to such ludicrous demands?
__________________
Portlandia
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9936  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2014, 4:25 PM
aerogt3 aerogt3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 121
What a load of complete madness. Have you guys gone to any news outlets with this? And Derek, it sounds like Imperial Beach caving in wasn't the issue, but rather the coastal commission being able to delay things by 2 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9937  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2014, 5:14 PM
spoonman's Avatar
spoonman spoonman is offline
SD/OC
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,430
Manchester would have a field day with this...unless he is intimidated also.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9938  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2014, 6:13 PM
mello's Avatar
mello mello is offline
Babylon falling
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,605
Travis your story infuriates me Have you guys considered going to the media with this story? It sounds like the premise of "low cost coastal access" is similar to what is delaying Sunroad from moving forward with its huge hotel project on Harbor Island.

Faulconer and Jerry Brown talk about jobs, well how many jobs have the Coastal Commission held up with instances similar to what Travis just laid out? I'm sure the mayor of Imperial Beach has lambasted the CC and tried to get in touch with Jerry Browns office.

I spent a decent amount of time in IB this year and it was growing on me and I could see the potential. Projects of this nature is exactly what that city needs to start to bring in more professional mid income people. There is almost nothing modern with quality architecture in IB and this sounded so awesome. When people in a community see solid structures being built in their area it gives them a sense of self worth and they think "Ok someone cares about IB and is willing to invest here". Something must be done about this.
__________________
<<<<< I'm loving this economic "recovery" >>>>>
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9939  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2014, 12:07 AM
ElDuderino's Avatar
ElDuderino ElDuderino is offline
Droppin' Loads
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ventura, Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 288
My pictures 11/19

Pendry Hotel



Courtyard Marriott



Courtyard Marriott with Sempra Energy tower



Sempra Energy tower. Cladding looks nice in person

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9940  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2014, 6:06 AM
HurricaneHugo's Avatar
HurricaneHugo HurricaneHugo is offline
Category Five
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,994
I'm assuming it's topped out
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:23 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.