DENVER | 1900 Sixteenth St | 250 FT / 76 M | 18 FLOORS - Page 2

rds70 · #21 Posted **Oct 20, 2008, 12:31 AM**

10-19-08 - Up to the 14th floor:

FrancoRey · #22 Posted **Oct 24, 2008, 2:56 AM**

Additional photos from me and today, 10-23:

1900 16th!

The glass is ready for the main facade. It sooo shiny.

Last tiny roof shot.

rds70 · #23 Posted **Nov 16, 2008, 11:26 PM**

11-16-08:

16 floors up, one more to go:

BTW, here is the latest rendering of the entire project, courtesy Tryba Architects:

pablosan · #24 Posted **Nov 16, 2008, 11:51 PM**

This project is coming along nicely. Thanks for the updates.

CONative · #25 Posted **Nov 28, 2008, 5:40 PM**

This one is really popping up when you see it from I-25.

The Dirt · #26 Posted **Dec 22, 2008, 7:50 AM**

I just wish they would put up the glass curtain as fast as they're putting up the concrete walls. It looks a little drab from the south side, so it could use a little more glass. Of course, by phase 3, we won't be seeing too much of that side anyway.

rds70 · #27 Posted **Dec 29, 2008, 4:23 AM**

12-27-08: Topped out:

FrancoRey · #28 Posted **Dec 30, 2008, 7:59 PM**

Oh, how I heart the glass.

It's much more reflective in the sun. Still very nice.

rds70 · #29 Posted **Jan 2, 2009, 1:31 AM**

1/1/09:

FrancoRey · #30 Posted **Jan 14, 2009, 9:24 PM**

Recent night shot from Navyweaxguy of 1900 16th, looking northeast. Denver's CBD is to the right from this angle.

Jaroslaw · #31 Posted **Jan 15, 2009, 4:43 AM**

What a p.o.s. Architectural content=0.

navyweaxguy · #32 Posted **Jan 15, 2009, 7:43 AM**

This building isn't about greatness. It is about replacing a dirt lot with a functional building that adds much needed density to that area.

FrancoRey · #33 Posted **Jan 15, 2009, 8:49 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaroslaw

What a p.o.s. Architectural content=0.

I really wish I could disagree. I hate the angle from the last pic. If there was more of the reflective glass on that side, it would look half-way decent.

That being said, Navy's right. Any building is better than no building.

WonderlandPark · #34 Posted **Jan 15, 2009, 3:54 PM**

Architecturally, its pretty bad, I've seen it in real life. Would fit better in a suburban office park. But it does get rid of a dirt lot.

The Dirt · #35 Posted **Jan 15, 2009, 10:05 PM**

I think that when all 3 phases are complete, you won't see the ugly side of this building quite as much. Architecturally, it is "meh" overall, but I think it will look decent when put into context among the other 2 structures on this block and all the new stuff going up in the adjacent blocks.

rds70 · #36 Posted **Feb 2, 2009, 4:31 AM**

2/1/09:

FrancoRey · #37 Posted **Feb 6, 2009, 3:09 AM**

Adding the finishing touches on the outside. What are these steel grids for?

rds70 · #38 Posted **Mar 16, 2009, 12:03 AM**

March 15, 2009:

The Dirt · #39 Posted **Mar 25, 2009, 4:50 PM**

Taken on 3/22.

pablosan · #40 Posted **Mar 27, 2009, 10:57 PM**

This is turning out to be a great addition to the CPV.