Quote:
Originally Posted by archie-tect
Its really unfortunate that the token Olgilvy façade is completely dwarfed by the addition. Instead of being a marker, it becomes more background. I would have been in favour of keeping the whole building (at five storeys), but that ship has sailed. At some point you have to wonder if it is time to put the poor neglected building out of its misery and call a spade a spade.
|
That would be the right call for the corner of Cumberland and Murray, but not for Ogilvy IMO.
The full building was fine. Sure it needed some esthetical renovations on the exterior (mostly fix some detailing and repoint the brick work, replace the glass in the windows) and a clean up, rebuild of the interior (it had already been gutted in 06 to get rid of asbestos), but it was structurally fine. I cannot stress that point enough.
What is proposed is a good... I don't want to say compromise, but anyway. My point is, the 1906 façade is still grandiose in size and detailing that it is worth remounting. It is somewhat dwarfed by the expansion, for one I would like them to tone down the entrances, but it is still well integrated.