Sacramento - Page 2

Tony · #21 Posted **Apr 20, 2005, 8:58 PM**

2:1

1:1

ltsmotorsport · #22 Posted **Apr 21, 2005, 1:32 AM**

Damn, that's good. Thanks a lot Tony.

So when does it get uploaded?

Tony · #23 Posted **Apr 21, 2005, 1:47 AM**

You're veelcom. It's already been uploaded, need someone to approve it that's all.

urban_encounter · #24 Posted **May 13, 2005, 4:37 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taylordaman

No one likes Sacremento.

we're used to it.......

urban_encounter · #25 Posted **May 13, 2005, 4:41 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony

2:1

1:1

Damn, that looks better than the real thing!!

ltsmotorsport · #26 Posted **Jun 21, 2005, 11:30 PM**

*New heights* The tower on the left in this pic (tower 1) will be 597ft, while the tower on the right (tower 2) will be 615ft.

Also, some other new pics:

SacTownAndy · #27 Posted **Jun 22, 2005, 5:05 PM**

^ I have a question about the Towers- I noticed in the Sacramento diagram that "The Towers on Capitol Mall" is listed with only 1 entry (like it's only 1 building). Instead of doing just one drawing for this whole project, shouldn't it be broken out between tower 1 and tower 2 since they are distinctly separate buildings? Skyscrapers.com even has it listed as two separate towers. Not sure if a moderator would know the answer to this?

I noticed that in the diagrams for cities like Miami and San Diego where we're seeing a lot of the twin tower condo projects going up that they are all broken out between tower 1 and 2 each with their own drawing, so shouldn't that be the case with this project also? Just a thought.

ltsmotorsport · #28 Posted **Jun 22, 2005, 5:27 PM**

I think they should remain as one becuase they are two towers that are part of one building. Like the old twin towers in NY were seperate, but these condos in sac share 10 stories of the 53 total.

ltsmotorsport · #29 Posted **Jun 28, 2005, 5:33 PM**

A big thanks to Peaches for the 301 drawing.

Taylordaman · #30 Posted **Jun 30, 2005, 6:25 AM**

Sacramento is still getting ignored.

ltsmotorsport · #31 Posted **Jul 1, 2005, 5:11 PM**

Yeah, but at least we got one major building drawn. You wanna help out, Taylor?

Also, this project was announced about a month ago.

701 L street
31 stories
430 feet
office/condo tower

ltsmotorsport · #32 Posted **Jul 12, 2005, 12:05 AM**

No one? Anyone?

Pandemonious · #33 Posted **Aug 19, 2005, 11:12 PM**

701 L Street:

enigma99a · #34 Posted **Aug 20, 2005, 7:46 AM**

wow looks good.

SacTownAndy · #35 Posted **Aug 21, 2005, 6:39 PM**

Holy Crap! Pandemonious, that looks amazing!!! Sweet job!!

If you have free time and feel like doing any other Sac drawings, there's still a few major highrises missing drawings. We would be fortunate to be graced with your talent!!

Epic
50-stories
615 feet

Aura
38-stories
440 feet
More photos at: www.auracondos.com

The Parthenon
29-stories
457 feet

Capitol Grand
38-stories
400 feet

cascraperdude · #36 Posted **Aug 21, 2005, 6:58 PM**

Very nice 701 L Street, Pandemonious -- thanks!

Pandemonious · #37 Posted **Aug 28, 2005, 5:41 PM**

I am swamped with school now. I will try and do some more over the next few weeks. My sights are set on Aura next.. very cool design. I don't care much for Libeskind's Epic Tower...

ltsmotorsport · #38 Posted **Aug 28, 2005, 7:50 PM**

Yeah, that's kinda the feeling of most of us too. But glad to hear you want to do more. They are badly needed.

urban_encounter · #39 Posted **Sep 21, 2005, 2:20 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pandemonious

I am swamped with school now. I will try and do some more over the next few weeks. My sights are set on Aura next.. very cool design. I don't care much for Libeskind's Epic Tower...

Thanks for the drawings Pandemonius. BTW your not alone in your opinion of Epic. I think the final design will be more refined just as Aura's has evolved.