HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2006, 4:34 AM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,598
10th and Yamhill update

This arrived in my mailbox today as part of the "Three Downtown Parks" Oct. newsletter:

The PDC is working with the Office of Management and Finance to revitalize the 10th and Yamhill parking structure. The original project was to improve ground-level retail and improve the safety concerns in the stairwells. An expanded project is now envisioned that would introduce new residential and commercial uses in addition to parking. This scenario would generate maximum new development and tax revenue as well as attract private investment to the area. Four developers responded to a Request for Information and all were deemed qualified.

In October 2006, OMF plans to issue a Request For Proposals seeking site proposals from the qualified developers. Key evaluation criteria will be:

-Upgrades to or new ground floor retail

-New housing units or commercial use

-Maximum private investment leveraged

-Preservation of SmartPark parking to support downtown businesses

-Preservation of City revenue

It is expected that developer selection will be made between January 2006-February 2007.

For more information, contact Lisa Abuaf at 503-823-7380 or abuafl@pdc.us
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2006, 3:31 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
Nice tower, city says, but could it be taller?
Thursday, October 26, 2006
Fred Leeson
The Oregonian

In a city seemingly leery of tall buildings, the Portland Design Commission made an unusual request of developers planning a tower at 431 S.W. 12th Ave.

Could you, they asked in a hearing this month, make it a little taller?

Once planned for 31 stories and 325 feet, the revised scheme stands at 22 stories and 266 feet because a hotel company withdrew from the project.

"The reality and the economics proved impossible to make it happen," said Larry Bruton, an architect with Zimmer Gunsul Frasca.

Lower floors of the shimmering glass structure would become headquarters for the prominent ZGF firm. The upper 17 stories would hold 274 apartments, ranging from 550-square-foot studios to three-bedroom units of 2,125 square feet.

So what's up with height downtown? After all, residents squawked about tall towers in the South Waterfront, the City Council toppled a 19-story proposal in Goose Hollow and neighborhoods routinely fight proposals for four- or five-story buildings.

The answer lies in a phrase: downtown skyline. Portland's height limits mean the city will never grow as tall as Seattle or San Francisco, but tall buildings still define a city's core. And since completion of the U.S. Bancorp tower in 1983, nothing tall has been built in the blocks just south of Burnside.

"If you could take advantage of the height, seeing a tall slender tower on the skyline would be a nice addition," said Jeff Stuhr, a Design Commission member. Commissioner Andrew Jansky called the ZGF plan "beautiful" but added, "I still think the extra height when you have the opportunity is something to go for."

Unlike at some Design Commission meetings, nary a resident showed up to object.

Taller would be fine with the building designers, too. But fast-rising construction costs may outpace what renters are willing to pay. "It's really a market judgment for the type of units this building will provide," Bruton said.

The tower is not without a downside, even at reduced height. It would block views of the stately 185-foot First Presbyterian Church steeple for pedestrians and motorists heading south on Southwest 13th Avenue.

"Any building that is built in that envelope would block it," said Lloyd Lindley, a Design Commission member. Saving the view would erase half the development, said Eugene Sandoval, the building's chief designer.

Instead of the historic spire, eyes in the 13th Avenue corridor could be drawn to a novel 21st century feature. Preliminary plans show rooftop pillars for five wind turbines.

"We're still flirting with the idea," Sandoval said, adding that it's too soon to know what the turbines would look like.

Lindley encouraged Sandoval to press ahead. "We talked about turbines in the South Waterfront," he said. "I'm encouraged by everything the developer, Gerding/Edlen, has tried. Try your very best to make it happen. We need an example."

The commission will continue its review Nov. 2, when a favorable vote is likely. The meeting, open to the public, will be at 1:30 p.m. at 1900 S.W. Fourth Ave., Room 2500.

Fred Leeson: 503-294-5946; fredleeson@news.oregonian.com

http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/o...850.xml&coll=7
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2006, 9:58 AM
mcbaby mcbaby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 587
would be nice to see the smart park redeveloped with housing and better retail. make it more asthetically pleasing and safer. right now, kind of dingy, underutilized and people use it as a public toilet at night. remember reading somewhere that the arcade facing the max stop would be removed to prevent people from loitering. if that happens then maybe a better shelter should be put in place for pedestians and passengers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2006, 1:52 PM
Dougall5505's Avatar
Dougall5505 Dougall5505 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P-town
Posts: 1,976
PDC is conducting a study right now about demolishing the smart park and building a tall residential tower with enough parking spaces to offset the loss of portland's busiest parking garage

look at post #2 for the full story
(gerdling/edlin proposed a 460 ft building)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2006, 4:19 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517

27-foot 'setback' moves Portland high-rise forward
Ladd Tower - A 21-story condo building gets approved after the tower is pushed back from the Park Blocks
Monday, November 06, 2006
FRED LEESON
The Oregonian

The measure of success for a new condo tower facing the South Park Blocks amounts to 27 feet.

First Christian Church won approval Thursday for the once-controversial 21-story Ladd Tower at Southwest Jefferson Street and Park Avenue after developers moved the upper 18 stories 27 feet back from the Park Blocks' frontage.

Unanimous approval from the Portland Design Commission was a dramatic turnaround from icy receptions to two earlier proposals. The first set the tower flush to Park Avenue and the second pushed the tower back seven feet.

Paul Schlesinger, a design commission member, called the 27-foot setback "a huge sea change to what we saw before." Addressing the developer and architect, he said, "You've shown a willingness to listen to the community and to us."

Opponents of the earlier plan said the structure was out of scale among smaller buildings on the Park Blocks. They said it would cast shadows and change the character of the city's beloved downtown green space.

But most resistance melted with the changes outlined Thursday. The Downtown Neighborhood Association withdrew its opposition, and only one citizen, downtown resident Vance Yoakum Jr., testified against it. "It's like saying an eight-inch nose is OK if you move it a little to one side or the other," he said.

The revised design also includes other significant changes. A smooth stone pedestal will stand four stories on the Southwest Broadway frontage but only three stories on Park. And a slender inset slot of light blue glass will extend from the ground to the top on the north and south facades, visually breaking up the tower's mass.

The setback on Park moves the bulk of the tower to the Broadway side. "It creates a new closure on Broadway," enhancing that busier street, said Lloyd Lindley, a design commission member.

John Carroll, a developer working with First Christian, called the design a "low-ego building" that is "warm and comfortable" at street level. Given the controversy and subsequent changes, "I think we have a better building," he said.

The building will sit on the north half of the block, replacing the Rosefriend Apartments and a church annex. The church and the historic Ladd Carriage House will remain on the southern half.

However, the wooden carriage house will be moved temporarily while an underground parking garage is being built, then be returned to its original site.

Steve Poland, an architect with Ankrom Moisan Associated Architects, said demolition is scheduled for December and January. The carriage house move is set for early February.

The complicated new building will contain 210 condo units, street-level retail spaces and church facilities including a great hall for special events. The entrance to the condo lobby will be on Park Avenue.

First Christian owns the block. In earlier meetings, church officials said the underground parking and new development were essential to the church's ability to remain at its historic downtown location.

Fred Leeson: 503-294-5946; fredleeson@news.oregonian.com

http://www.oregonlive.com/news/orego...450.xml&coll=7
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2006, 8:16 PM
Dougall5505's Avatar
Dougall5505 Dougall5505 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P-town
Posts: 1,976
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2006, 11:04 AM
westsider's Avatar
westsider westsider is offline
Kicking a** since 1907
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 437
It's been almost 25 years and there is still nothing to tie big pink in with the rest of downtown, the planing comission should raise the hight limits for everything within the loop. Those darned view corridors are mainly to blame. Anytime a building goes up that's taller than it's neighbors somebody's losing a view. Is it really that important to have a uninterrupted view of the mountian from washington park? I would love to see a couple 650+ footers between bancorp and wells fargo. The skyline would'nt appear so squat and dumpy, and portland would look like the great city it is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2006, 1:10 PM
pdxtex's Avatar
pdxtex pdxtex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,124
I agree big pink does seem a bit displaced but I would hardly call Portland squat. The best view I think is looking south from the Fremont Bridge. Then it looks anything but short.
__________________
Portland!! Where young people formerly went to retire.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2006, 4:26 PM
pdxman's Avatar
pdxman pdxman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,037
I'll always wonder why the city lets people who live in the west hills decide what gets built in downtown...its ridiculous. Excuse me west hills people, you're blocking my view of beaverton!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #130  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2006, 8:42 PM
brandonpdx's Avatar
brandonpdx brandonpdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 550
I like the view from Washington Park and I'm glad it is protected. I like sun light on the streets too. Sure a tall building is fun to look at from a distance but it's less to be desired when walking in a cavernous dark shadowey street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #131  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2006, 10:37 PM
westsider's Avatar
westsider westsider is offline
Kicking a** since 1907
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 437
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdxman
I'll always wonder why the city lets people who live in the west hills decide what gets built in downtown...its ridiculous. Excuse me west hills people, you're blocking my view of beaverton!
Thats the way I feel. Nobody wants to look out their window and see a huge wall, but most of those houses are 15+ blocks from downtown. The highrises are hardly in their face. They already have a city view so why not make it better?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #132  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2006, 6:31 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
looks like the Portland Art Museum bought the land where the Delano was the be built.

a few ZGF renderings



__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #133  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2006, 5:50 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
^but what about Hood? I've always enjoyed the framing of Mt. Hood behind downtown's towers when I'm up in Washington Park.
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #134  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2006, 3:49 AM
westsider's Avatar
westsider westsider is offline
Kicking a** since 1907
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 437
Why is this thread so slow? Is it just easier to seperate out all the news on the regional?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #135  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2006, 4:43 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
mods, can this be moved to the high rise construction thread? We have everything from completed project to just announced projects tracked on here.
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #136  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2006, 4:44 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
West End about to grow taller... (from the design commission agenda for January 18)

Applicant: Tom Gibbons, LRS ARCHITECTS
Site address: 1405 SW Morrison St, MANHATTAN TOWER

The applicant seeks design advice on a potential development of a 325-foot tall, 32-story condominium "point" tower. The tower will house approximately 207-220 residential units, including townhouses that will front SW Alder
Street and SW 15th Avenue. Above ground office parking and below ground residential parking will be provided. The applicant will be requesting a 75-foot height bonus through Design Review above the allowed height of 250-
feet. Modifications to rooftop mechanical area and mechanical screening may also be requested.
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #137  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2006, 7:26 AM
mSeattle's Avatar
mSeattle mSeattle is offline
Socialism 4 Extreme Rich?
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: here
Posts: 10,073
This should change the view from the west hills.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #138  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2006, 2:15 AM
Dougall5505's Avatar
Dougall5505 Dougall5505 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P-town
Posts: 1,976
this should be moved to the construction sub forum
the benson tower



























the recently completed elliot







this is the site of the approved ladd tower













in this building opus is moving into a space and the door it says "ladd tower" construction office" so it looks ready to start

its going to be interesting to see this house get moved



this building will be demolished for a low-rise and additional future developtment
[IMG][/IMG]
this is park block 5 which is going to be a new park over a very deep underground parking garage











happy new year!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #139  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 4:52 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
early elevation renderings for proposed Manhattan Tower on SW 14th and Alder







__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #140  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 4:31 AM
NYC2ATX's Avatar
NYC2ATX NYC2ATX is offline
Everywhere all at once
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SI NYC
Posts: 2,448
how tall is this one supposed to be? ^^^^
__________________
BUILD IT. BUILD EVERYTHING. BUILD IT ALL.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:25 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.