HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2011, 6:54 PM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,191
TransAlta admits power price manipulation

TransAlta admits power price manipulation


By Dina O'Meara, Calgary Herald November 8, 2011

TransAlta Corp. faces paying the highest penalty in Alberta's history after admitting to manipulating power prices last year, but critics say the $370,000 fine is a pittance compared with an estimated $5.5 million that consumers paid in inflated costs.

TransAlta, which controls 16 per cent of Alberta's commercial power, admitted to purposely blocking the import of cheaper hydroelectric power from British Columbia over 31 hours last November, creating an artificial shortage of electricity - and higher prices...


Read more: http://www.calgaryherald.com/busines...#ixzz1dEggEgQ3
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Heritage Watch - Forums
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2011, 6:55 PM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,191
The fine should be 5.5 million ordered refunded to consumers, PLUS the $370,000 fine
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Heritage Watch - Forums
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2011, 7:15 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,440
I agree. Another article:
Quote:
TransAlta ruling fires up opposition

By Dina O'Meara, Calgary Herald; With Files From Kelly Cryderman, Calgary Herald. November 9, 2011 9:38 AM

“When someone breaks the rules, the seriousness of the punishment should be appropriate to the seriousness of the offence,” said Kent Hehr, opposition energy critic. “The responsibility of ensuring this never happens again falls squarely on the shoulders of government.”

Read more: http://www.calgaryherald.com/busines...#ixzz1dElXLjwZ
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2011, 8:58 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 24,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by DizzyEdge View Post
The fine should be 5.5 million ordered refunded to consumers, PLUS the $370,000 fine
Yup, that would be fair. A $370 000 fine to them is loose change and won't affect anything.
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2011, 10:25 PM
kw5150's Avatar
kw5150 kw5150 is offline
Here and There
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,807
In other related news, another coal fired power plant has been approved in Alberta and does not have to adhere to new regulations to cut Co2 emissions by 50%.
__________________
Renfrew, Calgary, Alberta.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 2:25 AM
albertantraingeek's Avatar
albertantraingeek albertantraingeek is offline
Getting sick of the NCF
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NW Calgary
Posts: 153
Seriously? What's the reason for the exception? Enviro-weenies arn't gonna be happy about that one.
***

Somewhat related is that TransAlta closed off the Parking lot at the end of Bearspaw Dam Road in Calgary this week. No public access to the road on the other side. People were PISSED 'cuz it's a very popular spot for dog-walking. And that's putting in nicely. Too much trespassing on the RR tracks is what Im told >__> If thats the case then people kinda had it coming.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 3:02 AM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,440
Quote:
Originally Posted by kw5150 View Post
In other related news, another coal fired power plant has been approved in Alberta and does not have to adhere to new regulations to cut Co2 emissions by 50%.
The Federal Coal rules haven't been finalized yet, and there has been no special exception made in law. To be seen however is whether Environment Canada's comments on not wanting plants rushing to beat the proposed deadline to not need to comply with the 'as good as gas standard' for emissions will be enforced in some way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 5:32 AM
albertantraingeek's Avatar
albertantraingeek albertantraingeek is offline
Getting sick of the NCF
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NW Calgary
Posts: 153
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker View Post
The Federal Coal rules haven't been finalized yet, and there has been no special exception made in law. To be seen however is whether Environment Canada's comments on not wanting plants rushing to beat the proposed deadline to not need to comply with the 'as good as gas standard' for emissions will be enforced in some way.
Thanks for clearing that up, I wondered because if that was the RR industry making exceptions, shit would've hit the ceiling, & I was worried that the same thing would happen here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:20 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.