Oh no, not this again!!! Freakin' Cumberland County.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
Attention directed to bus network
Thursday, December 23, 2004
BY MATT MILLER
Of Our Carlisle Bureau
CARLISLE - A trip to Pittsburgh has left some Cumberland County leaders keener to explore a bus rapid transit network for the West Shore, rather than a system that would use trains.
Commissioner Rick Rovegno, transportation authority member Thomas Sweeney and Planning Director Kirk Stoner spent Dec. 17 riding the Steel City's commuter rail and express bus systems.
The trip was sponsored by Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.
The bus system is efficient and promotes economic development along its route, they told the county transportation authority yesterday.
"There may be some good applications for us here," Sweeney said.
Cumberland County commissioners are urging consideration of a Mechanicsburg-to-Harrisburg bus line as a supplement -- or alternative -- to the proposed Corridor One commuter rail.
Corridor One is a proposed $76 million plan, calling for commuter trains on 54 miles of track between Lancaster and Carlisle.
The trains are scheduled to start running between Lancaster and Harrisburg in late 2007, and would serve Harrisburg International Airport. Service is scheduled to expand west to Mechanicsburg in 2008 and to Carlisle in 2010.
The bus rapid transit line would be built along a Norfolk Southern rail line that also is being eyed for the commuter rail. The cost of the bus line has been estimated at $50 million.
Buses would pick up riders in surrounding neighborhoods, then use the buses for unimpeded runs to and from the city.
Cumberland County's commissioners have not signed on with the proposal to launch Corridor One on a Lancaster-to-Harrisburg-to-Mechanicsburg route.
Capital Area Transit, the midstate's largest bus provider, and Modern Transit Partnership, which is promoting Corridor One, have called the rail option superior to the bus line. Those agencies deemed the rail option superior.
Rovegno said a bus line is worth exploring since "rail can be three times as expensive to build and operate as buses."
Sweeney said Pittsburgh's bus system, run by Port Authority of Allegheny County, has eastern and western arms. The western arm averages 8,500 riders daily, he said.
Port Authority officials "were skeptical that [commuter] rail could be effective at that level of ridership," Sweeney said.
Modern Transit Partnership has estimated initial daily ridership for Corridor One at 3,500.
Stoner said "significant economic development" has occurred along the Pittsburgh bus lines, where facilities are placed to afford commuters opportunities to shop while they wait for buses.
"Economic development will happen whether it's light rail, commuter rail or busways if you do it right," Stoner said.
Authority member Larry Joyce said a problem with a West Shore bus line is that commuters would have to get off the buses in Harrisburg and board a Corridor One train to get to Harrisburg International Airport.
"Accessing the airport is important," Rovegno replied. "But what is going to make this rise or fall is the work-commuting trips."
Joyce also wondered whether buses would lure local commuters.
Authority Chairman Mary Lehman said a bus line is worth investigating;
but noted that Pittsburgh commuters, unlike those on the West Shore, have a history of using public transportation.
Rovegno said Port Authority officials told him "they have been able to attract the middle class to the buses."
Those riders will be paying more.
The Port Authority has announced plans for fare boosts and service reductions. Pittsburgh's and Philadelphia's transit systems face operating deficits and are asking the state for financial help.