HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2022, 11:22 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,024
Wow, Jockvale Road! Rare you see any affordable or social housing outside the Greenbelt.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2023, 11:01 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,335
Doug Ford has badly shortchanged Ottawa on housing funds
Of the $200-million+ Ontario promised for supportive housing and homelessness programs, the province's second-largest city is getting only $845,100.

Randall Denley, Ottawa Citizen
Published Apr 25, 2023 • Last updated 7 hours ago • 3 minute read


Ask yourself if this is fair.

In its latest budget, the Ontario government promised an additional $202 million annually for supportive housing and homelessness programs. Of that money, the city of Toronto will get $48 million a year. Ottawa, the province’s second-largest city, will get $845,100.

Toronto is nearly three times as large as Ottawa, which would suggest that Ottawa’s share should have been somewhere between $16 million and $18 million, Ottawa Mayor Mark Sutcliffe says.

Having made no headway trying to deal with the problem informally, Sutcliffe is making his dissatisfaction public in a letter sent Monday to Ontario Premier Doug Ford. In it, Sutcliffe says, “This small budget allocation is devastating news to our community. I’m appealing to your sense of fairness and your concern for the most vulnerable in our city and asking you to revisit the allocation to Ottawa.”

Clearly, Ottawa has a problem with affordable housing and homelessness. The city has about 2,000 homeless people. The family shelter system is 366-per-cent over capacity, meaning that families have to be put up in motels. The city has seen increasing shelter demand from newcomers and people from smaller communities with a lower service level.

Ottawa was counting on $17 million in provincial money for projects that are in development or under construction. A staff analysis, cited by Sutcliffe, says that the funding shortfall will mean the city has to cancel 54 supportive housing units expected to be ready over the next 18 months. With less money than anticipated, Ottawa will build between 570 and 850 fewer affordable housing units than planned each year and will have less money than needed for programs to prevent homelessness.

Toronto got nearly 60 times as much as money as Ottawa, but at least Toronto is a big city with a significant homelessness problem. Largely rural Grey and Bruce counties in southwestern Ontario — combined population 175,000 — received more than $1.8 million in additional money, more than double what Ottawa got. Other municipalities received increases of between 18 and 200 per cent.

A spokesperson for Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Steve Clark says the new allocations are driven by recommendations in a 2021 auditor general’s report, which said homelessness funding was based on out-dated data. One of the goals was to boost funding for smaller municipalities. Mission accomplished, and Toronto as a bonus.

No doubt some municipalities did need big increases, but why was it done at the expense of Ottawa, where the need for more supportive and homelessness spending is visible and longstanding? The provincial decision suggests that the city has all the money it needs to contend with this persistent social problem. That’s hard to believe.

This is the kind of decision that is made when a city has no leverage or strong representation at Queen’s Park. Our presence in the Progressive Conservative caucus is minimal. We have veteran Nepean MPP Lisa MacLeod, who has been hampered by health issues, and nearly invisible Carleton MPP Goldie Ghamari. Our only cabinet minister, Kanata-Carleton’s Merrilee Fullerton, retired suddenly in March. There will be a byelection, but it will be surprising if the PCs field a cabinet-ready candidate.

The best protection against unfair treatment is a strong cabinet minister to protect our interests. The lack of one is a problem that won’t be easy to solve.

Admittedly, Ottawa voters didn’t give the PCs much to work with in forming a cabinet, but that doesn’t mean the government should forget about our city. One solution would be to appoint a regional minister to look after Ottawa. The obvious choice would be Leeds-Grenville MPP Clark, whose riding abuts the city, but he’s also the minister who just stiffed us on homelessness and housing money. Clark’s riding, by the way, got a funding increase 102.6 per cent.

Without provincial political help, that leaves things up to Sutcliffe and city council. This is a good battle to fight, but it will be a tough one to win.

Randall Denley is an Ottawa political commentator and author. Contact him at randalldenley1@gmail.com

https://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/de...-housing-funds
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2023, 11:24 PM
passwordisnt123 passwordisnt123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ottawa (Centretown)
Posts: 626
Wow. I'm genuinely speechless about that Denley article. That's truly scandalous what the province has done to us.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 12:30 AM
qprcanada qprcanada is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by passwordisnt123 View Post
Wow. I'm genuinely speechless about that Denley article. That's truly scandalous what the province has done to us.
I think Sutcliffe's lack of political experience and connections at Queens Park compared to Watson's (who was mayor for a long time and an MPP/cabinet minister) combined with the lack of an Ottawa representative at the provincial cabinet is costing the City of Ottawa money.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 8:47 AM
LeadingEdgeBoomer LeadingEdgeBoomer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by qprcanada View Post
I think Sutcliffe's lack of political experience and connections at Queens Park compared to Watson's (who was mayor for a long time and an MPP/cabinet minister) combined with the lack of an Ottawa representative at the provincial cabinet is costing the City of Ottawa money.
Ottawa has often felt that we are short-changed by the province, especially compared to the GTA. Looks like the gap may be getting worse. This difference in funding is ridiculous. The Ford gov't did not seem to be concerned about the plight of Ottawans during the Convoy occupation either. Ottawans are second class citizens at Queen's Park.

Last edited by LeadingEdgeBoomer; Apr 26, 2023 at 11:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 11:24 AM
SL123 SL123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,378
Ford doesnt seem to want to be the premier of Ontario he wants to be king of the GTA thats it
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 11:39 AM
LeadingEdgeBoomer LeadingEdgeBoomer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,024
On a lighter note: AP reports that residents of a building in an upscale district of Frankfurt Germany decided to withold part of their monthly rent, because the landlord sunbathed in the nude in the courtyard. A new way to achieve affordable housing?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 11:46 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeadingEdgeBoomer View Post
Ottawa has often felt that we are short-changed by the province, especially compared to the GTA. Looks like the gap may be getting worse. This difference in funding is ridiculous. The Ford gov't did not seem to be concerned about the plight of Ottawans during the Convoy occupation either. Ottawans are second class citizens at Queen's Park.
It's not even just these examples. He promised to help pay for the Derecho damage, and he never did. When we had the ice storm the other day and hundreds of thousands were without power, I don't even think he acknowledged us.

Unless he's in town to fund part of a Federal initiative, he completely ignores us. I'm shocked he didn't cancel the Liberals' last few funding promises (Stage 2, new Civic, CHEO).

Quote:
Originally Posted by SL123 View Post
Ford doesnt seem to want to be the premier of Ontario he wants to be king of the GTA thats it
That's exactly it. He wanted to be Mayor of Toronto. When he had the opportunity to run for Conservative Leadership, and by extension the Premiership, he took it. Now he can run the entire GTA from Queen's Park.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 1:10 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,335
Ontario homelessness funding decision met by challenge by mayor, discussion at council Wednesday

Taylor Blewett, Ottawa Citizen
Published Apr 26, 2023 • Last updated 10 hours ago • 5 minute read


Ottawa will receive just 0.4 per cent of new provincial funding for homelessness and supportive housing programs, destined for municipalities around Ontario.

It’s a decision Mayor Mark Sutcliffe is challenging on fairness grounds, and one that city staff are warning will hinder Ottawa’s ability to support people experiencing homelessness. Local supportive housing providers and advocates have expressed shock and outrage.

The provincial position, meanwhile, is that its new approach to handing out these funds reflects an important correction. A past formula saw some cities — Ottawa included — receive a larger share of funding than other places that needed it more, according to the office of Housing Minister Steve Clark.

In an unusual move, and at the request of the mayor’s office, a staff analysis of the funding decision has been added to the agenda for Wednesday’s council meeting. Councillors will be able to ask questions, and opine publicly on a decision that the mayor has also directly requested the governing Progressive Conservatives revisit.

The background

The province is the funding source for more than two-thirds of city spending on homelessness

In 2022, Ontario consolidated three separate funding streams into a single new one, called the Homelessness Prevention Program. Ottawa’s allocation in that first year rose $1.5 million from the previous level of l $47.6 million.

Then came the 2023 provincial budget, and the news the governing PCs were injecting another $190.5 million annually, provincewide, into the Homelessness Prevention Program.

Ottawa’s share of the new HPP funding was just $845,100 in extra money annually, for a total of $48.5 million every year between 2023 and 2026. That money funds street outreach, emergency shelter for residents, the operation of supportive housing, and other city investments.

Staff write in their report to council that other cities are getting bigger bumps, on both a per-capita basis and when calculated as a percentage of existing funding.

After being informed of Ottawa’s funding total, “staff immediately began to inquire about the rationale for the confirmed allocation amount,” the report states.

The formula in question

According to Housing Minister Steve Clark, the province is relying on a new model for distributing HPP dollars across the province.

As of the writing of their report to council, published Tuesday, city staff said they had been “unable to obtain satisfactory clarification from the province on how the funding formula was utilized to calculate each municipality’s allocation, including Ottawa’s amount.”
Victoria Podbielski, a spokesperson for Municipal Affairs and the housing minister, told this newspaper via email Tuesday that the updated formula “is based on a community’s share of homelessness, supportive housing units, low-income households, households in deep core housing need (as defined by CMHC), and Indigenous and youth populations.”

According to the minister’s office, it was developed “based on feedback from the auditor general and municipal stakeholders who were clear that the previous model was not transparent and didn’t accurately reflect measures of local need.

“Under the previous model some municipalities, like Ottawa, received disproportionately higher funding than other municipalities with higher determined need.”

City staff, meanwhile, say they are “not aware of any consultation process that would have occurred across the province.”

Toronto is to receive a $48-million share of the additional funding, according to staff. The disparity between this total, and the allocation to Ottawa – the province’s second-largest city – has been challenged by the mayor, including in a letter he sent Monday to Clark and Premier Doug Ford.

“I don’t understand any logic that would dictate that … Toronto would get 60 times as much as Ottawa, that the issue of homelessness in Toronto is 60 times what it is in Ottawa, doesn’t resonate in any way with me,” Sutcliffe said in a Tuesday interview.

The impact

Perhaps the most dire claim in the staff report on the province’s decision is that, immediately, it will “see 150 households without shelter every night,” and this figure will continue to climb.

Traditionally, the city’s position has been to provide an emergency shelter option to anyone who found themselves without a roof over their heads.

Ottawa’s Housing Services branch is now looking at a budget pressure of $37 million, according to staff — $17 million short of what’s required to operate “at current service levels” next year, and without $20 million needed on the capital side “to support our proposed strategies to transition out of recreational facilities and invest in longer term options to meet the current and future housing needs of people experiencing homelessness.”

The city previously had access to pandemic-era provincial funding, since ended, which it used to set up shelter beds in “physical distancing centres” at city rec facilities.

Staff, in their report, draw a direct link between the current money available from the province, and the city’s ability to deliver on the goals on its 10-year housing and homelessness plan, which is based on funding from all three levels of government.

These includes the creation of 570 to 850 affordable or supportive housing units every year between 2020 and 2030 — a target the city already hasn’t been able to meet, CBC Ottawa reported in February — with at least 10 per cent of those units being in the supportive category.

“The lack of provincial funding may require the scaling back of efforts to support all individuals experiencing homelessness,” staff write. “The city’s overall ability to respond to homelessness in the community will remain stagnant as service demands and operating costs increase.”

The city hall response

Sutcliffe said he felt he had no choice but to go public about the funding matter, after previous engagement at the provincial level — including on phone calls with the premier, and at a meeting with cabinet members — failed to produce any movement on their side.

The mayor said Wednesday’s briefing is mainly to give councillors an opportunity to ask questions and further their own understanding of the situation, in the wake of the news about Ottawa’s funding amount. But it’s also “a way of drawing attention to the consequences of this allocation.”

As for the city’s side of the housing-and-homelessness investment equation — there was some bristling at budget time, for instance, that the city’s own $15-million capital commitment to affordable housing has been largely static for years — Sutcliffe said the municipality does needs to spend more going forward, but also up its work on alternative contributions to housing creation, such as city land.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...ncil-wednesday
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted May 4, 2023, 1:40 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,335
Push to use public land for public housing comes to Ottawa city hall, where ears are open to ideas to tackle housing crisis

Taylor Blewett, Ottawa Citizen
Published May 03, 2023 • Last updated 10 hours ago • 6 minute read


A professor of urban planning in Australia for nearly two decades, housing policy consultant Carolyn Whitzman recalled Monday how one state government came to her, wanting significantly more affordable housing — and without having to spend to make it happen.

“I said, ‘Aha! Let me introduce you to land policy’,” said Whitzman. “About six months after the report we did for them got passed, there was modular housing going up on a former road allowance from the state government, and it’s there now and it’s saving lives.”

Whitzman is making much the same pitch in a new report, prepared for the Alliance to End Homelessness Ottawa, and presented at Ottawa city hall this week.

Focused on “scaling up” non-profit housing in Ottawa, the report presents a formula it says city decision-makers can use to create homes that are affordable to people making moderate incomes, and potentially, some with low-incomes.

The key is giving free land to non-profit housing providers, along with other relief like fee waivers and tax exemptions. To demonstrate this, the report presents a number of hypothetical development scenarios – though they do rely on some additional assumptions, such as municipal dollars invested, a lending rate not presently available, in one case, and the need for additional operating dollars for projects involving supportive housing units.

For a city-owned site near the future Lincoln Fields LRT station, Whitzman and her co-authors model a 516-unit development across three imagined buildings.

Thirty per cent of its units would lease at 80 per cent of median market rent: from $800 for a studio to $1,279 for a unit with three or more bedrooms.

The rest of the rents would have to be between $2,210 for a one-bedroom and $3,500 for a three-plus bedroom “to support the mortgage financing necessary for financial viability” for the imagined $276-million project, which considers costs and funding sources.

It does rely on $27.9 million being granted by from the city (which has historically budgeted $15 million a year for such grants), as well as another $8.5 million in waived development charges.

The report states that non-profit housing affordability deepens over time, compared to market housing, as the years pass and landlords operating on a for-profit basis raise rents.

“However, in order to produce deeply affordable rents and adequate supports, the City of Ottawa needs to partner with provincial and federal governments.”

One of the report’s key recommendations is for city to revisit a 2019 report by a city hall staff task force. It identified 20 sites with the potential for affordable housing development in the short, medium, and long term, on public land near O-Train stations.

The Whitzman-Alliance to End Homelessness report, which was sponsored by Toronto-based anti-poverty group Maytree, recommends the city issue requests-for-proposals for all city-owned sites identified in the task force report, by the end of 2023.

One of those sites was at Bayview Yards – 6.6 hectares of city property just west of Bayview Station, and a site reportedly under consideration as a potential location for a new Ottawa Senators arena.

While this parcel was identified by the 2019 task force report as offering a short-term development opportunity, neighbouring federally owned land on the other side of Bayview Station Road, and city-owned property south of Scott and Albert streets (currently home to the Tom Brown arena), were also labelled as possible hosts, in the long-term, for affordable housing.

The Whitzman report proposes that “a large-scale, showcase affordable housing project” be prioritized for the area around Bayview. Between 17 hectares of public and privately-owned land, zoned for up to 30 storeys, the report says up to 12,000 homes could be created “in one mixed-income, mixed-use precinct, including associated social infrastructure and amenities that could serve the whole city.”

The report was presented at council’s planning and housing committee on Wednesday, where staff were asked about the status of the 20 government-owned sites identified in their 2019 report.

Peter Radke, director of the corporate real estate office (CREO), said he hadn’t seen this particular list, but the city does look annually at its own land inventory to see what it can dispose of. He’s been with the city for more than a decade, “and we’re reaching higher and higher up the tree, the low-hanging fruit is gone and now we’re getting ladders to get some of that land that we can surplus and put on the market, or to transfer to housing services.”

A lot of city lands have contamination issues, meaning remediation would be needed before construction, said Radke. Some sites are also being used as staging grounds for the LRT project, added David Wise, the acting director of economic development and long-range planning.

Wise said staff would like to do a more comprehensive review of the 2019 list of properties, and other sites with CREO, “to see which ones might be a little bit more ready to go than some of the others.”

Interim community and social services general manager Clara Freire also noted that from an affordable housing development perspective, “land is not the greatest barrier for us.” It’s capital funding, she said, as well as operating funding in the case of supportive housing.

But it’s not just large, LRT-adjacent sites that Whitzman’s report recommends the city take a look at. It identifies “several hundred parcels of land owned by municipal, federal and provincial governments in all suburbs of Ottawa that are suitable for affordable and supportive housing development.” The report includes a map of such sites, courtesy of another project Whitzman worked on last year, which also scored each parcel for its access to amenities.

“There should not be a new library, a new health centre, a new firehall — a new stadium — without lots of housing on top,” Whitzman said in an address Monday to a group that included city councillors and senior leaders in the local non-profit housing sector.

Co-presenter Kaite Burkholder Harris, executive director of the Alliance to End Homelessness Ottawa, identified councillors Cathy Curry and Marty Carr as two champions of their work on the report.

Both councillors also sit on a working group with the mayor, which is leading a series of reviews of city spending on programs and services. In opening remarks at Monday’s presentation, Curry said the review is not about finding savings for the sake of it — it’s about identifying dollars that could be applied to term-of-council priorities, which will soon be formally established.

“One of them is housing. It has to be. I think we’re all in agreement,” said Curry, who represents Kanata North.

Referring to her fellow council members, Curry told Whitzman and Burkholder Harris that they have “25 people listening very carefully who want to do the right thing. And that right thing may look different for different people, but it’s not because they don’t understand the importance of this.”

Curry was to bring forward a motion at council’s planning and housing committee on Wednesday, where the Whitzman report was on the agenda. She wanted staff to review all of it, and if there was anything they didn’t agree with, to report back and explain why.

With the support of her colleagues at committee Wednesday, Curry directed city staff to consider the report’s recommendations, as they prepare to apply for funding next month under a federal program aimed at accelerating housing construction, and refresh Ottawa’s own 10-year housing and homelessness plan next year.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...housing-crisis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted May 4, 2023, 3:08 PM
phil235's Avatar
phil235 phil235 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
[B][SIZE="4"]“There should not be a new library, a new health centre, a new firehall — a new stadium — without lots of housing on top,” Whitzman said in an address Monday to a group that included city councillors and senior leaders in the local non-profit housing sector.
This quote is interesting, and may actually be a recipe for action. If new neighbourhood amenties are tied to affordable housing (or even just multi-family housing) by by-law, it seems more likely that we would see supply being built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted May 13, 2023, 12:57 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,024
Circling back to a 2019 report on possible sites for new affordable housing; other than Gladstone Village (one tower proposed, but no movement otherwise) and the nearby redevelopment of OCH properties, we've seen little movement.

https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...ml#document/p1

The priority should be the parcel between the new Library and Dream LeBreton. It's imperative that this block be fully complete to ensure a coherent and accessible urban district. Patrons of the library should be able to go from Pimisi to the Library without walking through, or around, a construction site. I'd like to see one tower of 40-50 floors on a 6-12 (step-up) podium.

Next, the baseball stadium parking lot. I see an opportunity to build a mini Lansdowne, without the expense of new sports facilities. A one or two level parking garage, topped by pedestrian streets surrounded by mixed-use. Heights could vary from 40 floors along the Queensway, stepping down towards Coventry (6 to 8 floors).

We then have the site on Richmond that was expropriated for the Byron tunnel. Building up the street wall along an area that's already partially urban with great potential for further growth north of Byron Tramway Park. I see here twin towers of 30 floors on an 8 floor podium.

Bayview/Tom Brown should wait until we know what's happening with the Sens. If they secure LeBreton and shovels are in the ground, then it will be safe to plan. If LeBreton fails, this is the next best site. Tom Brown should definitely be replaced with a Sensplex, either on site, or closer to the arena.

All of these projects can and should be a mix of market housing, affordable for mid-income and deeply affordable/social housing. Something along the lines if 50/30/20. For the arena, it may need to be 80/10/10 to help fund the facility. Partner with private or not-for profit companies.

I'd like to see all of these (including Gladstone Village) redeveloped by 2030. Once these sites are developed, the next ones can go up for proposals.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted May 13, 2023, 2:52 AM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,662
I'm really gunning for the 250 Lanark/Graham Spry Building site in Westboro. I would love to see some significant height and density on that side of the O-Train trench to counterbalance all the 'luxury' going up in a line on the other side. With a 32 story building next door and 40 story twin towers across the trench there should be no objection to creating a very dense and tall affordable housing project directly attached to mass transit here. This site could easily accommodate 5000+ units and everything the new occupants would need is within a few minutes walk.
__________________
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/the.harleydavis/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted May 13, 2023, 2:03 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harley613 View Post
I'm really gunning for the 250 Lanark/Graham Spry Building site in Westboro. I would love to see some significant height and density on that side of the O-Train trench to counterbalance all the 'luxury' going up in a line on the other side. With a 32 story building next door and 40 story twin towers across the trench there should be no objection to creating a very dense and tall affordable housing project directly attached to mass transit here. This site could easily accommodate 5000+ units and everything the new occupants would need is within a few minutes walk.
Should be near the top of the list as well. Such a project would provide a good oppopportunity to deck over the transit trench and provide more functional greenspace for the quickly growing population.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted May 24, 2023, 5:12 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,335
New funding lets City of Ottawa shore up homelessness shortfall
City has been lobbying province since getting just $840K in funding top-up

Kate Porter, Elyse Skura · CBC News
Posted: May 24, 2023 11:39 AM EDT | Last Updated: 1 hour ago


The City of Ottawa has learned it will receive more than $20 million in provincial funding for an Ottawa Community Housing project, helping staff fill a surprise shortfall in its budget for tackling homelessness.

The mayor and city council expressed dismay last month after learning Ottawa would receive only $845,100 of the $190.5 million in new money for homelessness under the Homelessness Prevention Program — a paltry 0.4 per cent increase that's far below money given to other municipalities, especially in northeastern Ontario.

It was also far less than city staff had expected.

More than a month later, after the mayor had several talks with Ontario Premier Doug Ford and other provincial officials, a solution: a contribution for an Ottawa Community Housing project at Wateridge Village that the City of Ottawa had pledged to spend millions on.

"Normally we would get somewhere in the range of $16 to 18 million and this is more than that, so I think it shows commitment on the part of the province," Sutcliffe told CBC.

"We're grateful for the fact that they found a solution and that we have some more resources now that we can put to good use in addressing homelessness in our community."

The city's total annual allocation for the Homelessness Prevention Program for a three-year period starting April 1, 2023 is now set at $48,464,600.

When Ottawa raised concerns about the initial funding shortfall, the Ontario government said it was meant to balance out a previous overpayment.

Sutcliffe and city staff then began a public campaign in the days following for increased funding, and Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Steve Clark sent a letter explaining the province's decision. Clark said it was a response to concerns raised by the province's auditor general.

He wrote that a 2021 audit had revealed previous funding allocations had been outdated and sometimes lacked the data to justify decisions on spending.

"The revised funding model ensures that all Ontario residents will have equal access to the province's substantially increased homelessness prevention funding, rather than advantaging any one community at the expense of the others," Clark wrote on April 28.

Running Ontario's second most populous city, municipal staff were unconvinced and said the money was needed to tackle the increasingly complex housing crisis.

Ottawa's shelters are over-capacity and under particular strain, staff said, and the inadequate provincial funding would add to the pressure. A quarter of those in shelter are newcomers to Canada, staff said.

Homeless families are a particular concern. The City of Ottawa has three times more families in need of shelter than the units it has available, and 300 families are currently in overflow spaces in motels, as well as post-secondary buildings.

That includes 21 homeless families deemed large, with seven or more people, and require larger units that are hard to find.

Meanwhile, 11,065 households were waiting on the city's centralized list for subsidized housing at the end of 2022, which had only seen 1,230 households find a home over the course of the year.

Just hours before the mayor learned the city would receive more funding, the city's director of housing services Paul Lavigne had outlined the need to get people out of shelters and in homes during a meeting of the community services committee.

"If people are housed, we want to do everything we can to keep them housed. Because this is not a friendly housing market," said Lavigne.

Councillors at Tuesday's community services committee meeting approved a plan to give Lavigne full discretion on how to spend any additional provincial funding, were it to arrive. One day later, city council gave that plan the green light.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...gram-1.6852471
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted May 24, 2023, 5:18 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,024
Glad this has been resolved. We shouldn't have needed to fight for the extra funding in the first place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 1:46 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,335
Project Mikinak affordable housing project gets $24.1 million infusion from province
The money is in addition to $48 million in funding for Ottawa through Ontario's Homelessness Prevention Program.

Blair Crawford, Ottawa Citizen
Published May 24, 2023 • Last updated 3 hours ago • 2 minute read


The Ontario government is providing more than $24 million to help fund Project Mikinak, an east-end development by Ottawa Community Housing that will provide homes for seniors, families, Indigenous people and those with developmental disabilities.

The money, announced in Ottawa on Wednesday by Minister of Housing Steve Clark, will fund up to 138 affordable and supportive units of the 271 homes at Mikinak in the Wateridge Village on the site of the former Rockcliffe air base.

“These 138 new homes will be offered to Ottawa residents with a clear need, including those currently living in emergency shelters,” Clark said. “Instead of ad hoc or temporary housing arrangements, these Ontarians will have access to new, safe supportive housing that will provide them with the stability and the opportunity they need to succeed.”

The money is in addition to $48 million in funding for Ottawa through the province’s Homelessness Prevention Program. It also helps offset what the city felt was its minuscule share of a $202-million pot to address homelessness province-wide. Ottawa received just 0.4 per cent of that $202 million, a portion the provincial government said was based on a new formula using up-to-date stats.

Mayor Mark Sutcliffe, who quipped Clark’s announcement “was the most exciting gathering in the mayor’s office since Ryan Reynolds came to visit,” said the new money helped make up for that disappointment.

“This money today allows us to fulfil a requirement that we felt was not being fulfilled with the previous funding,” Sutcliffe said to reporters after the announcement. “In the end, the total amount of money we’re getting to address homelessness and affordable housing in Ottawa has just gone up by $24.1 million and that’s great for the City of Ottawa.”

The development at 715 Mikinak Rd. will include a mix of unit sizes with varying levels of affordability, including average-market-rent units and below-market-rent units. Last fall, the project received $78 million in federal funding.

The government’s capital investments will help keep rents at Mikinak low, OCH chief executive officer Stéphane Giguère said.

Approximately 33,000 people are tenants of Ottawa Community Housing, and there is a waiting list of 12,000 names for affordable housing. That translates to an average wait of 5 1/2 years, said Coun. Theresa Kavanagh, the chair of OCH.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...-from-province
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 1:54 AM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 23,612
Is this a new project, or does it relate to the building(s) that's already going up?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 2:23 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,335
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer View Post
Is this a new project, or does it relate to the building(s) that's already going up?
It's this one, currently under construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2023, 7:04 PM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 633
Some good news for existing affordable housing, majority of ccoc properties are now municipal tax exempt. With the result being a $45 Million payout to CCOC and no future municipal tax bills for there properties. In conjunction with other policies put in place by the city more properties will likely be added to this list as the city helps them continue to buy properties......

https://twitter.com/gowlingwlg_ca/st...vzO-_FjWQ&s=19
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:49 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.