HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4481  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2018, 1:42 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
It's a type-o.

The submitted documents show the height at 161M (264M ASL) on the elevations.
That makes much more sense.

So, this is the third confirmed and potentially 4th tower over 150 metres in the Burquitlam area.

I always enjoy seeing such height (and getting an official number) but would be nice to see some of these taller towers going up in downtown Coquitlam.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4482  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2018, 5:08 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,147
These will be way more visible in Burquitlam than Coquitlam Centre area. A much better area to live too, closer to everything. Cool to see my area changing.
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4483  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2018, 3:59 PM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 2,816
Looks like they're proposing a considerable road network upgrade for the Coquitlam Inn site. I can't imagine that they'd be able to get away without putting a full intersection up where the road would meet Lougheed. It's probably a bit overdue at this point with the busy ICBC/Joey's/etc parking lot next door.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4484  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2018, 5:47 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,147
Joeys is moving into that new development. They really do need to redo some of the intersections on north road, there are so many lights and traffic often blocks the intersections. I imagine most of those little strip malls will be getting redeveloped as well in the near future. I think the plaza where hmart is getting redeveloped soon too.
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4485  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2018, 8:40 AM
urbancanadian urbancanadian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 671
Yeah Anthem also owns the strip mall with the Joey that will be moving. That site will see at least two more towers in a future rezoning.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4486  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2018, 2:22 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,187
Oh wow. Burquitlam is getting some serious height! I hope this will help put back 70-storey tower plans in Lougheed Centre!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4487  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2018, 2:33 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Where Vancouver policies definitely fail though are the height / density restrictions imposed around their transit hubs.

The tallest towers in our entire metro theoretically should exist / be built around Waterfront, Granville - VCC, Commercial - Broadway, and the future Cambie - Broadway Hub. Furthermore the remainder of Broadway should be built to heights at least tpvthose seen in Yaletown.

Commercial - Broadway and Cambie - Broadway are especially embarrassing / neutered by pointless height restrictions.
You've nailed it again, Metro. This is the one major component of the whole Metro Vancouver, "Livable Region" plan,
whatever it's called, that truly gets no more than a C- or maybe even D on its report card, for blowing it and losing height/building space opportunity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4488  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2018, 8:29 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 12,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Oh wow. Burquitlam is getting some serious height! I hope this will help put back 70-storey tower plans in Lougheed Centre!
70 is still completely possible. The other towers are not designed or settled as far as height/massing go.

I bet we'll see in the low 60s on the tallest corner of Lougheed, not quite 70, but that's just a guess.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4489  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2018, 10:27 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,187
It's interesting how many 50-storey towers are proposed in far-flung areas such as Lougheed and Burquitlam, when it's not yet common height even in more mature neighborhoods such as Brentwood, Metrotown or even Downtown. Crazy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4490  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2018, 3:01 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,187
If only these massive vertical neighborhoods would also have jobs. Now most people will be commuting, adding to the traditional rush hour pattern towards the Downtown. I would like to consider living in these areas, but commuting time to where most of the jobs in my sector are, is going to be too long. Too bad that only retail goes into suburbs and no office jobs.

With all this development, North Road needs to be upgraded to 3+3 lanes. Already now there is no traffic light flow (unknown to Metro Vancouver) and one needs to stop at every single light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4491  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2018, 3:27 AM
invisibleairwaves's Avatar
invisibleairwaves invisibleairwaves is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 638
I'd love to see more commercial space in the area for sure, but as long as Burquitlam remains a relatively affordable area, a huge chunk of the residents are going to be students and retail or industrial workers who are commuting throughout the region instead of just clogging the downtown routes.

North Road could absolutely use better light timing/synchronization, but I don't think I'd want to see it 3+3 all the way through. Would hurt the walkability of the area and induced demand would probably negate any benefits. A better street grid that doesn't funnel everyone up North Road would be better, but that's going to take time as the huge blocks get broken down.
__________________
Reticulating Splines
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4492  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2018, 4:54 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,187
I hope that is the type of people moving into these developments but I have been surprised to see new units in the area asking Burnaby and low-end Downtown level rents. Those are not really affordable anymore.

I don't think adding two lanes would induce any demand but adding 20 000 new residents certainly will. North Road will be an idling parking lot even with the Skytrain, which will be a sardine can unless train lengths are soon increased.

More people requires more infrastructure just to maintain today's (poor) service levels. We are seeing minimal infrastructure investments, meaning that the service levels are dropping fast. Round the clock congestion is here to stay.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4493  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2018, 5:02 AM
GMD GMD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
If only these massive vertical neighborhoods would also have jobs. Now most people will be commuting, adding to the traditional rush hour pattern towards the Downtown. I would like to consider living in these areas, but commuting time to where most of the jobs in my sector are, is going to be too long. Too bad that only retail goes into suburbs and no office jobs.
Office type jobs are hard to come by, Coquitlam has been trying to attract them for years (to 'downtown' Coquitlam primarily) with little success. What is more frustrating to me is in the rare places where there ARE plenty of office jobs, but no rezoning of surrounding areas to permit people to live nearby (e.g. Renfrew station).

But like invisible says, I'd guess the new residents in Burquitlam area will be headed all over the place, not primarily to downtown, and at least they are right on a (underused) transit line, so that will limit the traffic impacts.

The city (Coquitlam at least) is trying to improve the woeful street grid as part of various developments, but it is so bad (being on the boundary of two cities doesn't help) that I can't see real relief for North road ever becoming much of a reality on that front, happy to be proven wrong.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4494  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2018, 5:08 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,147
Coquitlam has a shared workspace office in the centre area, it looks quite popular.
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4495  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2018, 5:33 AM
GMD GMD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
Coquitlam has a shared workspace office in the centre area, it looks quite popular.
Yes, the office building at Suter Brook (opened 2016 - they *are* adding office jobs at the Evergreen stations, but it is slow and relatively small to date) is mostly shared space as well and also popular - seems like that is where the commercial market is in the burbs for now, not many big firms, but a certain volume of small ones.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4496  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2018, 4:31 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,147
most of the old buildings are gone now where Hensley will be

2018-07-16_09-21-00 by snub_you, on Flickr

2018-07-16_09-21-20 by snub_you, on Flickr
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4497  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2018, 4:34 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,147
Capital to the right, cranes for Lougheed Heights to the left

2018-07-16_09-21-56 by snub_you, on Flickr
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4498  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2018, 2:38 AM
invisibleairwaves's Avatar
invisibleairwaves invisibleairwaves is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 638
Rezoning application and details for Townline's 38-storey project at Clarke and Cottonwood in Burquitlam: http://www.coquitlam.ca/docs/default...nts/item-7.pdf

And LedMac's 50-storey tower next door to the north: http://www.coquitlam.ca/docs/default...nts/item-8.pdf
__________________
Reticulating Splines
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4499  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2018, 11:40 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,350
Burquitlam Capital


By City of Rain July 22nd:

Quote:
Originally Posted by City Of Rain, post: 1360089, member: 70034
IMG_0908 by Hung Lam, on Flickr

IMG_0911 by Hung Lam, on Flickr

IMG_0913 by Hung Lam, on Flickr

IMG_0923 by Hung Lam, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4500  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2018, 8:14 PM
BodomReaper BodomReaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 987
Whyyy did they have to ruin an otherwise consistent design with that one element of white spandrel on the north facade of the tower? What a shame. Totally unnecessary.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:54 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.