HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #261  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2009, 9:40 PM
dennis dennis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,281
I think that the transcanada system should be
upgraded. even though the majority of hwys converge in winnipeg, many trucking companies elect to take the interstate system west.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #262  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2009, 9:44 PM
Spocket's Avatar
Spocket Spocket is offline
Back from the dead
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,508
So true. We really should have the entire length be limited access , divided , and four-laned from coast to coast. If the U.S. can build hundreds of them , I don't see why we can't manage one.
__________________
Giving you a reason to drink and drive since 1975.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #263  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2009, 9:44 PM
dennis dennis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,281
I think the proposal for an all weather road to churchill will also be a major boon to the centreport initiative. Truely the centre of a north-south-east-west corridor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #264  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2009, 3:36 AM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,743
$212 million gets you one full interchange at the Pertimeter north of Saskatchewan, a flyover over the CPR mainline and a 4 lane divided hwy for the length of the road. The budget seems pretty accurate from what i have seen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #265  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2009, 10:51 AM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
There‘s only one centre port
Editorial | The Chronicle-Journal | April 15, 2009
http://www.chroniclejournal.com/stories.php?id=179245

Determination by the Manitoba government to turn Winnipeg into the central hub of Canadian transportation became reality Tuesday when the prime minister dropped in to confirm federal support. The fact that Winnipeg is not central to Canada and is without a direct sea route has not stopped the province from pushing ahead with the project called CentrePort, of all things.

If only the government of Ontario had been so visionary – and the feds along with them – Thunder Bay might well be on a much wider road to economic recovery. While medical research gets established and mining service inches ahead, there is still nothing to replace the thousands of jobs lost in the slumping forestry sector. This could have been a part of that.

The Lakehead has always had a strong transportation base due to its place in the country. A few other Canadian cities are situated on every major transportation route – road, rail, air and seaway – but none are nearly so close to being an equal distance from east and west coasts of Canada and indeed, central to North America. This natural advantage has been used to one degree or another but never to its full potential.

The geographic challenges of Northern Ontario have ironically presented Thunder Bay with its transportation advantage because road and rail routes had to be squeezed through a single pinchpoint in the vast Canadian Shield. Thus, both routes of the Trans-Canada Highway and both national railroads go right through the city. They are in turn sandwiched between the third busiest airport in Ontario on one side and the western Canadian terminus of the great St. Lawrence Seaway on the other.

Thunder Bay used to be the world‘s biggest grain port but deliberate national transport policy has used emerging markets to Vancouver‘s advantage and federal favouritism to pour immense resources into Manitoba‘s remote Hudson Bay port of Churchill to artificially diminish Thunder Bay‘s place in the grain trade.

The CentrePort project will further divert Canada‘s shipping attention to a full intermodal terminal near Winnipeg‘s airport. Plans call for an 8,000 hectare trucking and rail depot linked to the airport‘s runways and the world beyond.

They‘ll have to realign the Canadian Pacific Railway line to bring it closer to CentrePort whereas CP and CN Rail already run right past Thunder Bay International Airport.

Manitoba‘s plan also calls for upgrades to the 1,100 kilometres of Hudson Bay Rail Line up to the port of Churchill, a tiny grain terminal with a miniscule shipping season. The rail line is operated by an American company but Canada will pay to repair it.

CN and CP both operate within sight of Thunder Bay‘s still mighty grain elevators, one of which loaded an ocean vessel with grain this week to open the 2009 shipping season here two months before any commercial ship can hope to enter Churchill. Thunder Bay‘s southern location in Canada will see this shipping season continue through next January long after ice again grips Churchill.

Credit Manitoba Premier Gary Doer with convincing Ottawa to support his vision. Even with considerable disadvantages, CentrePort will proceed in Winnipeg while Thunder Bay can only wonder why it‘s not happening here instead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #266  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2009, 11:59 AM
Only The Lonely..'s Avatar
Only The Lonely.. Only The Lonely.. is offline
Portage & Main 50 below
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,871
Thanks for posting that story Vid, it was interesting
__________________
WINNIPEG: Home of Canada's first skyscraper!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #267  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2009, 12:33 PM
sledhead35's Avatar
sledhead35 sledhead35 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 327
indeed. considering the geography, how marshy our land is in manitoba, and the relatively short shipping season for churchill, these dont look like the most efficient logistics. too bad for our friends thunder bay.
while saying that however, im still glowing with excitment about our economic oppertunity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #268  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2009, 2:16 PM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
Our land is just as marshy. It simply has more giant rocks in it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #269  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2009, 2:35 PM
harls's Avatar
harls harls is offline
Mooderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Aylmer, Québec
Posts: 19,699
The author of that article certainly has the bitter tone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #270  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2009, 3:31 PM
rgalston's Avatar
rgalston rgalston is offline
Density and complexity
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Parish of St. John
Posts: 2,644
That article sounds like it was written by Frank Sobotka.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #271  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2009, 4:22 PM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by harls View Post
The author of that article certainly has the bitter tone.
I don't blame them for being bitter when their provincial government is a thousand miles away and has absolutely zero interest in promoting their city or region.
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #272  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2009, 4:27 PM
harls's Avatar
harls harls is offline
Mooderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Aylmer, Québec
Posts: 19,699
Agreed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #273  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2009, 7:10 PM
sledhead35's Avatar
sledhead35 sledhead35 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 327
ill second that. not sure what the situation is exactly, but its gotta be hard to compete with the GTA for provincial attention, especially as of late.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #274  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2009, 10:09 PM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
It isn't just the north, but the north, especially the northwest, feels the negative effects the most. The GTA really takes a lot of the province's attention, and everything that isn't in the GTA suffers as a result. Windsor is, at the moment, much worse off than Thunder Bay or Sudbury. (There are smaller communities in the region that are worse, though.)

TVO had a discussion on Wednesday (the same day that editorial was published) about the north potentially separating. They basically came to the conclusion that it will probably never happen, and that demanding a regional government would be the best result. There are some municipal leaders in the region discussing it, others are opposed because it would mean more taxes to support another level of government. If it is going to be successful, it would need to have the ability to control hydro prices, resource management, large scale development strategies and so on. I think that ultimately a more decentralized model could work for the GTA as well, allowing the province to focus more on province wide projects instead of local mass transit in the GTA or whatever. (The GTA really needs a regional strategy. They have eight mass transit systems and about 20 governments serving what is functionally a single city, and many of them contradict each other in places.)

As for Centreport, a lot of people here had hopes of Thunder Bay becoming the big centre of trade, and Ken Boshcoff stated several times while he was mayor (and I think even MP) that he would prefer to see Churchill shut down, for the benefit of Thunder Bay. (The recent council has been more inwardly focused since our economy kinda died under the Hamilton/Boshcoff councils. The current council has actually developed strategies for the city to benefit from the oil sands and it is working, which is much better than an motion demanding an entire port disappears.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #275  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2009, 10:29 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is online now
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,881
thunderbay could stand to benifit off the centerport still though glad to hear that they are using the mountan barier of bc as an advantage to get stuff to the oil sands
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #276  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2009, 11:03 PM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
Yeah, for all the bad things I say about CN, their investments to the line between here and Calgary is going to benefit us a fair bit.

I'm sure once the development gets into full swing, Thunder Bay will have a "Centreport Consortium" as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #277  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2009, 11:05 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is online now
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,881
tb and winnipeg could unite to feed off eachother
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #278  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2009, 11:50 PM
The Jabroni's Avatar
The Jabroni The Jabroni is offline
Go kicky fast, okay!
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Donut Dominion
Posts: 2,967
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
tb and winnipeg could unite to feed off eachother
In a way, we already are. Case in point, we're communicating with vid!

But yeah, I think Thunder Bay will, in some way, benefit from this too. It may not be as much as Winnipeg, but it could be a boost in some way.

Only time will tell.
__________________
Back then, I used to be indecisive.

Now, I'm not so sure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #279  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2009, 12:04 AM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
tb and winnipeg could unite to feed off eachother
CANNIBAL CITIES!

Ontario and Manitoba should work together a lot more. It would really benefit this region, and thus benefit Ontario as we won't be "living off them" anymore.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #280  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2009, 12:43 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is online now
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,881
Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
CANNIBAL CITIES!

Ontario and Manitoba should work together a lot more. It would really benefit this region, and thus benefit Ontario as we won't be "living off them" anymore.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:10 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.