HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2017, 5:30 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
How Los Angeles Can Design for Density

Successful Buildings For A Better City


Feb 17, 2017

By Gerhard Mayer

Read More: http://la.streetsblog.org/2017/02/17...a-better-city/

Quote:
.....

In L.A., we think of a city as a vast region of single family houses with skyscrapers in the middle, but to the rest of the world, those two building types represent only the extremes to be used in their cities rather sparsely. Those cities mostly consist out of what we call “the missing middle buildings”. This article is devoted to two examples out of the vast catalog of those building types, because they create so much urban fabric elsewhere but do not exist in SoCal; even worse, they may be illegal for us to build at this time.

- A row-house is its own structure with its own structural walls. This means you can tear one house down and the one next to it will remain unaffected. Shared walls are not an implied feature of row-houses. They are the result of late 19th century developers cutting corners. Row houses have one big advantage over the detached houses of our suburbs; they offer palatable solutions to our housing shortage. One can fit many more row-houses into the same amount of land while retaining the look and feel of a residential neighborhood. Row-houses can achieve the minimum density required to run efficient, economically self-sustaining public transit. Once people stop depending on cars, they embrace alternate driving arrangements without vehicle ownership obligations.

- Europeans like sleeping with open windows facing quiet inner semi-private courts; but people also enjoy looking out into their street during the day. Thus, the standard European apartment offers this double exposure, with the living room facing the street and the bedrooms facing the garden interior. The courtyard is precious to people; they accept buildings squeezed tight against the street edge in order to keep the inside as open as possible. US apartment design rarely offers this double exposure. When you choose your apartment you pick on the left or the right side of the corridor, but you cannot have both. If you selected the street side, this then means all your rooms will be exposed to street noise, and you won’t want to sleep with your windows open.

- In typical American apartments air circulates through mechanical systems, which makes the building more expensive to build and operate. Apartments in euro-perimeter blocks are mostly passively cross ventilated through windows on two opposite sides of a building; there is no need for a fan to vent out old stale air; just open the window on both opposing sides, and voila! Passive ventilation used to be common in older, lower apartment buildings; but these days, such buildings are no longer being constructed, unless they are part of an affordable housing project. We do not have a method to build higher buildings while still offering passive ventilation for the apartments; and yet, this is completely possible regardless of building height.

- In typical Chinese housing construction, for instance, passive ventilation is available even in the highest of their towers. It is also the most common form of ventilation for a European city apartment. As a building typology, these block-edge buildings are called “primary vertical circulation types”, and they are fiercely efficient for developers. Without long, monotonous interior corridors, your front door is right off your stair landing; and you will share that landing with 1-3 neighbors. In this more intimate arrangement, people are more likely to know their neighbors and form social bonds than in buildings with anonymous front doors along long corridors. The vertical arrangement has also another advantage – it makes the building footprint quite small. This building type can easily fit an infill lot.

- The public resistance we are feeling against change is partially because we, the design profession, have not offered better ways to live in our cities, in the same ways the suburbs once appealed to the masses. If we want better cities, we will need to create them with different ingredients. There is a whole range of building types out there and we only employ a very small subset of them here locally. Both row-houses and perimeter apartment block buildings are part of the “missing middle”. They are also the core ingredients of cities aiming to solve housing shortages with quality of life and access to open space. We should study what works elsewhere, and if necessary, change our zoning and building codes to allow it here too.

.....



When we look at a typical built-out US city block, we know that there is little to no open space left inside that block.







But when we compare this to a solid looking European building block, we might be surprised to learn that buildings only line the edges against the streets, but that inside the block there is a green courtyard.







There was a competition for an urban block in Switzerland won by the famous Dutch firm MVRDV. The Urban Hybrid Micro City they propose would be a good solution in any city, even here in L.A.


__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2017, 5:41 PM
ChargerCarl ChargerCarl is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Los Angeles/San Francisco
Posts: 2,408
TL;DR: Legalize missing middle housing stock.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2017, 6:22 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,804
It would be expensive to provide a gazillion elevators on every block. I don't know the specific ADA rules but I believe they're required for most multifamily, and we're lazy slobs anyway.

In my city, the zoning and condo laws effectively require buildings to be either one unit or a big apartment building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2017, 6:30 PM
ChargerCarl ChargerCarl is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Los Angeles/San Francisco
Posts: 2,408
It's the same in LA. Very difficult to build small apartment buildings.

Same is true of pretty much anywhere outside of Houston in the US now that I think about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2017, 6:32 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChargerCarl View Post
It's the same in LA. Very difficult to build small apartment buildings.

Same is true of pretty much anywhere outside of Houston in the US now that I think about it.
uhhhhhhhh, small unit count multifamily can definitely still be built in chicago without elevators.



this example of a contemporary 6-flat was built across the street from my apartment when i lived in wrigleyville.

yeah, it's fucking ugly, but it's still 6 units with no elevator.

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.9455...0M2raNIkWQ!2e0


there are scores of other such similar examples in the windy city.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Mar 2, 2017 at 6:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2017, 6:35 PM
Citylover94 Citylover94 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 255
What counts as a small apartment building?

Boston is building tons of smaller apartment buildings of 3-10 unit buildings all over the city but especially in South Boston.

Some examples




Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2017, 7:13 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by M II A II R II K View Post
This typology would work well for Park La Brea should it ever be redeveloped (the NIMBYs would have a field day), but it hardly serves as a viable model moving forward. We have neither the vast open space nor the proper context needed for this to work successfully.
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2017, 7:21 PM
ChargerCarl ChargerCarl is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Los Angeles/San Francisco
Posts: 2,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
uhhhhhhhh, small unit count multifamily can definitely still be built in chicago without elevators.



this example of a contemporary 6-flat was built across the street from my apartment when i lived in wrigleyville.

yeah, it's fucking ugly, but it's still 6 units with no elevator.

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.9455...0M2raNIkWQ!2e0


there are scores of other such similar examples in the windy city.
Thats good to know.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2017, 7:46 PM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,849
LA is actually encouraging and building a lot of homes that are similar to row houses, referred to as Small Lot ordinance homes, which are basically detached (by about 3 inches) townhouses.. We've seen a few thousand of these units built, mostly in SilverLake, Eagle Rock, Echo Park and Highland Park areas (older, historic neighborhoods that surround DTLA and and have seen massive gentrification over the last decade.

Here are some examples

https://www.google.com/search?q=smal...F3BOQQ_AUICCgD
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2017, 7:53 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quixote View Post
We have neither the vast open space nor the proper context needed for this to work successfully.

Should work great for suburbs, particular to shift the streetscape to the sidewalk and hide away the unsightly asphalt if the courtyard has to accommodate much parking.
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2017, 8:11 PM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is offline
Dryer lint inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 37,956
I found LA to be rather dense for a "newish" west coast city. I think it is the densest metro area in the country even. It's just not tall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2017, 8:18 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,804
Seattle has a lot of small apartment buildings too. But they're mostly smaller units with double-loaded corridors.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2017, 9:34 PM
memph memph is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quixote View Post
This typology would work well for Park La Brea should it ever be redeveloped (the NIMBYs would have a field day), but it hardly serves as a viable model moving forward. We have neither the vast open space nor the proper context needed for this to work successfully.
I think it would be feasible, although maybe less along the lines of Berlin which has a lot of open space in its courtyards, and more along the lines of Vienna, Paris or Budapest which have smaller courtyards.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2017, 11:17 PM
Lear's Avatar
Lear Lear is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Europa
Posts: 917
Quote:
Originally Posted by M II A II R II K View Post



BERLIN !

(Sista City of L.A.)

__________________
Berlin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2017, 12:57 AM
Lear's Avatar
Lear Lear is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Europa
Posts: 917
__________________
Berlin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2017, 2:36 AM
pdxtex's Avatar
pdxtex pdxtex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,124
los angeles is already urbanized and dense. i think the author means, how can you decrease automobile dependency....
__________________
Portland!! Where young people formerly went to retire.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2017, 3:07 AM
Citylover94 Citylover94 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 255
Los Angeles is dense but urbanized at least from my perspective implies that a place is not automobile dependent and instead is based around a significant portion of the population walking, biking, and taking transit to commute within the area because of that I would not call Los Angeles urbanized at least not to the same extent as places like Chicago, Boston, and Philadelphia.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2017, 4:28 PM
pdxtex's Avatar
pdxtex pdxtex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,124
^^^ l.a. is unique in its uniformity. it doesn't have mile after mile of giant condo tower but what it does have is a very dense fabric in all directions. you can go 15 miles out from the core and still have the same density. as a metro, its the most dense in America. you just need to repurpose the infrastructure and mindset of the people. like metro Detroit, it helped write the playbook of post war, car dependency....
__________________
Portland!! Where young people formerly went to retire.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2017, 1:08 AM
dc_denizen's Avatar
dc_denizen dc_denizen is offline
Selfie-stick vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York Suburbs
Posts: 10,999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quixote View Post
This typology would work well for Park La Brea should it ever be redeveloped (the NIMBYs would have a field day), but it hardly serves as a viable model moving forward. We have neither the vast open space nor the proper context needed for this to work successfully.
Those Berlin blocks are equivalent to American row houses. The kind that all cities on the east coast are filled with
__________________
Joined the bus on the 33rd seat
By the doo-doo room with the reek replete
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2017, 7:21 AM
ChargerCarl ChargerCarl is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Los Angeles/San Francisco
Posts: 2,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_denizen View Post
Those Berlin blocks are equivalent to American row houses. The kind that all cities on the east coast are filled with
No I'm pretty sure they're a little denser.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:45 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.