HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > 2010 Olympic Winter Games [Archive]


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2010, 10:49 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Protesters will do everything to disrupt our Olympics

Why the Vancouver Sun published such a long article about the anti-2010 lunatics is beyond me...though it speaks quite a bit about the state of the media and its rather cynical and delusional world view:


Anti-Olympic protesters get their game on



By DOUG WARD, Vancouver Sun
January 29, 2010

VANCOUVER -- Anarchist punk ruled on the night of Jan. 22 at Victory Square, in the heart of the Olympic city. More than 200 anti-2010 protesters, some carrying black flags and burning torches, gathered for what had all the hallmarks of a dress rehearsal for the street protests that could erupt during the Winter Games just over two weeks away.

The crowd, mostly young, some wearing bandanas over their faces, had come to march against the "police repression" of anti-Olympic activism. A portable audio system jacked up the energy level with the opening chords of the Rolling Stones' Street Fighting Man. "Everywhere I hear the sound of marching, charging feet, boy," howled Mick Jagger.

A few protesters with megaphones screamed slogans, often laced with obscenity, at startled motorists: "No 2010!" and "Did You Vote For Gordon Campbell?"

The small but angry far-left demo recalled the much larger anti-globalization demonstrations of a decade ago: the APEC protest and the Riot at the Hyatt in Vancouver, the epic Battle in Seattle against the World Trade Organization and the violent clash between demonstrators at the Summit of the Americas in Quebec City.

Many alumni of those so-called anti-globalization convergences were in the crowd, along with younger activists seeking to emulate their radical forebears.

Among the veterans of those earlier protests was Alissa Westergard-Thorpe, an indefatigable anti-Olympic activist and a student at the University of B.C.

Now 35, Westergard-Thorpe is a key figure in the militant Olympic Resistance Network (ORN), perhaps the most radical of the anti-Olympic groups behind the "Take Back Our City" march from the Vancouver Art Gallery to BC Place Stadium, set for the afternoon of Feb. 12, when tens of thousands of people will be arriving at the stadium for the Olympic Games opening ceremonies.

"I hope it does go down like APEC," said Westergard-Thorpe, who was pepper-sprayed, strip-searched and arrested by police at that protest.

"I hope it does look like when Jean Chretien used to come to the Hyatt and we used to have thousands of people out in the street." :unsure:

Westergard-Thorpe added that the Feb. 12 marchers should be able to proceed toward BC Place as far as any non-ticket member of the public can get.

Whether any protesters would try to breach the security fences, she said: "That really depends on what type of police repression we face during the day. You know if we have a day where we're being beaten back by the police when you're simply trying to march, people's tempers can get high."

A 'mega-industry event'

As to whether she's hoping a disruption of traffic heading to BC Place might affect the opening ceremonies, set to be watched by millions of people around the world, Westergard-Thorpe said: "Absolutely, I would love to disrupt the opening ceremonies."

Westergard-Thorpe said sports should not be immune to politics.

"I'm not anti-sport. But I am against the idea that sporting events like this, which are really mega-industry events, are somehow separate from political events and they're not."

The names, faces and views of ORN members are familiar to police, who've visited many of the activists in recent months.

Staff Sgt. Mike Cote of the Vancouver 2010 Integrated Security Unit said security officials are concerned about the threat of disruption on the night of the opening ceremonies, but that the protest will be allowed to proceed so long as it is lawful.

"The ISU has no issue with protest as long as the protesters don't interfere with our security perimeter or with the rights of other people," said Cote. "And we have no reason to believe that the planned protest will not respect the laws in place in Vancouver."

Cote said there may not be vehicles to disrupt because traffic will be limited in the zone around BC Place, with little parking available in the adjacent area — "in fact, it will be non-existent."

The ISU media official said the final leg of the Olympic torch relay will be organized to ensure there is no disruption. "We have the capability of changing the relay route and upgrading or downgrading security at a moment's notice so it's really a call made on the ground."

ORN members said the protest size should be more than double the 400 demonstrators who disrupted the torch relay in October in Victoria. The protesters created havoc in the capital city's downtown for three hours, forcing relay organizers to move the torch by van to avoid the protesters.

Vanoc declined to comment on the proposed protest marches during the Olympics, citing its blanket policy that it respects "every citizen's right to freedom of expression as protected by Canadian law" and noting its security partners will "ensure peaceful, lawful and safe public demonstrations can occur outside of the venues in plain sight of the media and the public."

The "Take Back the City" march is being organized by the ironically named 2010 Welcoming Committee, whose endorsers include the Workers Communist party of Iran, the East Van Abolitionists and the Vandu Womyn's Group. 2010 Welcoming Committee spokesman Bob Ages of the Council of Canadians predicted the demonstration will stay within the limits of the law. "It's going to be very large and from our perspective it will be peaceful — there's no reason for it not to be," said Ages, who has had discussions with the Vancouver police department about the march.

But Ages' Council of Canadians is a middle-class, milquetoast group compared to ORN and its younger activists.

Despite its small size, the far-left ORN will be the most visible because the mainstream left, including the NDP and the labour movement, has mostly been supportive of the Olympics.

ORN is an umbrella organization for groups like the Anti-Poverty Committee, StopWar.ca, the Work Less Party and the Native Youth Movement. Ages acknowledged that ORN members may not follow the game plan.

"We have in the movement what I call a diversity of tactics. Some people have different ideas about the most effective way of getting their message across."

Westergard-Thorpe and ORN want the protests to become as much a part of the 2010 story as the gold-medal quests of downhiller Manny Osborne-Paradis or the Canadian hockey teams.

ORN is holding a two-day summit in east Vancouver with various seminars on the evils of capitalism and the Olympics. They are planning "days of action," beginning on the first day of Olympic competitions, Feb. 13, against Olympic corporate sponsors. (ORN members have defended the use of vandalism, even arson, to target corporate Olympic sponsors.) They are also participating in the annual Women's Memorial March, through the Downtown Eastside, to remember women murdered or missing in B.C.

While most Canadians think the Olympics are about striving for athletic excellence, most of these protesters believe the 2010 Games are just another "capitalist circus" not unlike the WTO or the G8 Summits.

Many of them are anti-poverty activists who believe that the Olympic Games have accelerated gentrification and homelessness in the Downtown Eastside. They fault Vanoc and the provincial government for failing to deliver on earlier promises to sharply increase social housing in the area.

Some have attacked the Olympics for damaging the environment, citing the destruction of the Eagleridge Bluffs in West Vancouver by the widening of the Sea to Sky Highway. Others say the Olympics are less about sports than promoting the interests of local developers and the marketing strategies of corporate sponsors like the Royal Bank of Canada, Coca-Cola, McDonald's and The Bay.

Finally, the ORN protesters say repeatedly that the Olympics are being held on unceded native land because the vast majority of first nations in B.C. do not have land claims treaties. The activists heap scorn on the chiefs and councils of the Lil'wat, Musqueam, Squamish and Tsleil-Waututh First Nations for becoming official hosts of the games. They call Phil Fontaine, former national chief of the Assembly of First Nations, a "collaborator" for taking a new job with RBC and promoting its sponsorship of the Olympic torch relay.

Grand Chief Tewanee Joseph, executive director of the Four Host Nations, dismisses claims the councils are selling out to the Games, noting the $57 million and 2,000 jobs brought to the aboriginal community as a result of the Olympics wouldn't have materialized otherwise. The Olympics are also an opportunity to share Canada's first nation stories, successes and culture with the world, he said, as well as educate the world about native poverty, suicide rates and land claims through education.

"Everyone has a right to voice their opinions. These are our lands and the Games are on our traditional territories but we don't need them to speak for us," he said of the protesters.

"We're a full partner and we're a proud partner; indigenous people have never been part of the Games before. We never want to be on the outside looking in. If we didn't do it somebody else would have stepped in and told our stories for us."

APEC remembered

Robert Diab, a lawyer who teaches legal studies at Capilano College, said it's unclear whether the police have learned lessons from APEC or the Riot at the Hyatt, two demonstrations where protesters were injured by the police.

Diab said the long-running uncertainty in recent years over protest zones during the Olympics could prompt some activists to see how far they can go. "It seems obvious that all of the anxiety around security and civil liberties at the Olympics may well become a self-fulfilling prophecy. There is so much tension over whether rights will be limited that we may see protesters trying to test the limits in a way they might ordinarily not be inclined to do."

To the protesters who turned out a week ago at Victory Square, the Olympics are too good an opportunity not to exploit.

A young woman in a hoodie took a megaphone and said: "They say the Olympics are coming in February. But we've been living in it for the last five years. And now we're in the thick of it: a s—t sandwich with no bread."

She passed the megaphone to a male comrade who raged that "these pigs would like to see the last breath of sanity choked out of this world. To me capitalism is exploitation and the state a murderer." Someone offered up a pro forma "right on!"

Local activist groups have been talking about disrupting the 2010 Games for years now.

They've put the word out to other anti-capitalist activists around North America to converge on Vancouver during the Olympics. And over the past few years, members of ORN have tried to muck up Olympic public events, forcing Vanoc to stop staging large Olympic-fever rallies in downtown Vancouver.

"If people have political issues, the Olympics is a way to get your issues through the media to the forefront," said Westergard-Thorpe, adding that ORN wants to illuminate the real Vancouver for the international media. "I don't want them to see a sanitized, corporatized image given to them. I want them to see what Vancouver is really about, which is poverty, environmental destruction and a crackdown on civil liberties." :lol:

A protest veteran

Chris Shaw, perhaps the best-known of the city's anti-Olympic protesters, also marched on Friday night as a medic, ready to help any protester injured in any confrontation with the police. He too is a veteran of earlier anti-globalization protests — "APEC sparked my interest and Seattle cemented it" — but he's not out of central casting.

At 59, he's older than most anti-Olympic activists. He's also a top medical researcher at Vancouver General Hospital, managing research projects into Parkinson's Disease and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Shaw was a key organizer of the No side in the 2003 plebiscite on the Olympics in Vancouver, which was won by the Yes side with 63 per cent of the vote.

As Shaw recounted in his book, Five Ring Circus: Myths and Realities of the Olympic Games, he became interested in the 2010 Olympics while driving back to Vancouver from a protest at the 2002 G8 Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta. He and his friends saw an article in a newspaper on the floor of their car about how Vancouver was hoping to get on the shortlist of cities bidding for the 2010 Games. Shaw and his friends discussed whether the Olympics was similar to the globalization phenomenon they had been opposing in Kananaskis.

"If so, maybe exposing it could be our 'wedge' issue, one that we could use to broach the flaws of globalization to an apathetic or uninformed audience," wrote Shaw in his book.

Shaw said he doesn't want to see any violence at the Feb. 12 march on BC Place. Shaw is the medical response coordinator for the protest.

"I would like to see a lot of people on the street, demonstrating and talking to people. I would like to see the embarrassment that a demonstration during the Olympics might bring to different levels of government. It might force them to deal with issues they've neglected. And if it was the start of a re-establishment of an anti-globalization movement, that would be icing on the cake."

Shaw is among several anti-Olympic critics who have attracted the attention of the ISU.

The police have visited the homes — and sometimes the workplaces and friends — of activists. So far there have been no pre-emptive arrests and the police have long dropped their earlier attempt to limit protest to safe assembly areas. They agree now that the whole city — at least the area outside security perimeters around Olympic venues — is a free-speech zone.

Nevertheless, the police visits are viewed by the protesters as a tactic of intimidation and further proof that the Olympics has undermined civil liberties. To that end, the rally on Friday night was called Struggle Against Police Repression and organized by the 12th and Clark Collective, which sounds like your basic off-Commercial Drive activist communal house. The march headed down Hastings Street, disrupting eastbound traffic.

As it passed the new Woodward's redevelopment, there was a sense of life imitating art. The scene was strikingly similar to the massive photograph mural hanging inside the atrium of Woodward's — Stan Douglas's Abbott & Cordova, which depicts a scene from the 1971 Gastown Riot.

Only in Douglas's hyper-real tableau, the police are chasing protesters on horses. On Friday night, policemen on mountain bikes accompanied the march along Hastings and did nothing to stop its progress.

The new Woodward's was also a reminder that the anti-Olympic protesters tactic of direct action — or "vulgar activism" as APC member David Cunningham once described it — can be effective.

Many credit the 2002 Woodsquat occupation of the old vacant Woodward's building for raising the issue of homelessness and setting in motion the eventual redevelopment of the landmark department store building.

This is one of the arguments for confronting the Olympics put forward by Gord Hill, a 41-year-old aboriginal activist, originally from near Alert Bay. Hill is another veteran of earlier anti-globalization protests who marched on Friday night and plans to join the Feb. 12 march on the Olympic opening ceremonies. He was arrested for disrupting the unveiling of the Olympic countdown clock three years ago and has been visited several times recently by police officers from the Vancouver 2010 Integrated Security Unit.

He said the intersection of the Feb. 12 march and the Olympic opening ceremonies is a "vulnerable point" for Olympic security officials. "We're going to disrupt the traffic flow for sure. I mean you can't have hundreds of people walking through the street and not disrupt the traffic."

He came up with the anti-Olympic movement's slogan of "No 2010 Olympics On Stolen Native Land."

Hill acknowledged that the public sees the Olympics as a "benign sporting event ... But when you scratch the surface you see what a putrid, disgusting thing it is."

Hill has discussed on his No2010.com website why anti-Olympic groups are willing to vandalize businesses. "Groups that carry out militant direct action are just one part of the anti-Olympics movement. Most do not carry out vandalism or arson. Those that do have targeted corporate sponsors of the Olympics as a form of sabotage (along with police & military targets). This can increase the costs for corporations seeking to profit from the Games, and could potentially deter some corporate investment. All militant direct actions that have occurred have consisted of property damage and no person has been injured as a result."

Border issues

Also at the Friday march was Harsha Walia, project manager at the Downtown Eastside Women's Centre and a regular participant in anti-Olympic events. Walia, who also marched in Seattle against the WTO, said it's unclear how many Americans will attend the anti-Olympic events. She expects that Canada Border Services Agency will do its best to prevent activists from crossing the border. She noted how the CBA stopped American journalist Amy Goodman at the border and questioned her for 90 minutes about whether she was coming to Canada to speak against the Olympics. American border officials have similarly tried to stop recruitment of American activists, added Walia, noting that B.C. Olympic critic Marla Renn was denied entry at the border, preventing her from speaking about the Olympics to college students in Oregon.

Both the Canadian and American border services say it will be business as usual during the Olympics and there are no plans to increase security measures to red-flag suspected protesters heading across the border.

Faith St. John, spokeswoman for Canada Border Services, was tight-lipped about how CBSA would deal with suspected protesters, saying only that Canadian admissions requirements will not change and individual travellers may be subject to more "in-depth examinations" on a case-by-case basis.

The Friday march concluded peacefully at Thornton Park in front of the Pacific Central Station. No laws were broken, traffic disruption was minimal and a smiling policeman was satisfied enough to quip that he thought the demonstrators' torches "were a nice touch."

Don't bet on the police being as complimentary during the direct action protests promised by ORN members during the Olympic period.

"The general goal is to disrupt the Olympics," said ORN's Hill, "and to send a clear message to the International Olympic Committee, Vanoc and other Olympic host cities that holding the Olympics can bring you this type of resistance."

With files from Kelly Sinoski

dward@vancouversun.c
© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Last edited by mr.x; Feb 5, 2010 at 5:45 AM.
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2010, 10:51 PM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
Jesus. Can they not add cliffnotes to their articles?

These people will probably ruin every single outdoor public celebration night, and I hope all of the houses have really good security.

In the end, they will do far more economic damage to Vancouver than the Olympics ever could. They'll make it so people won't WANT to come back.

It would be nice to see normal people doing counter protests. But alas, they're probably all too busy actually having a job, and a life.

These people should know they are not welcome, no matter how loud they are, or how much of a majority they have on the comments of CBC.

Last edited by Yume-sama; Jan 30, 2010 at 11:01 PM.
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2010, 11:18 PM
ckkelley's Avatar
ckkelley ckkelley is offline
Bridge Walker!
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Forest City
Posts: 1,037
I'm expecting a bit of noteworthy disruption but certainly nothing that's going to send things off the rails. I can see the David Cunninghams of the world getting locked up for the duration of the games if they become intolerable.
__________________
Just chimin' in.
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2010, 11:32 PM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
Like I've said before, I don't have a problem with protesting. But there is a difference between protesting, and being a militant protester. If they can play within the rules of this Country, that will be fine. That would be GREAT. I'd actually give them some respect. However, when they advocate such techniques as vandalism, arson, and violence (and they DO, as the article states, on their website), that goes WAY over the line. There will be problems, and it will be ugly. And as usual, they'll be out there trying to provoke violence, so they can catch something that looks "questionable" on camera, say a policeman with a baton, which they can then use as propaganda against the police and government.

If you're a professional protester like Chris Shaw is (anti-G8, anti-Vancouver 2010, anti-Chicago 2016, anti-Toronto Pan Am), the Olympics are the pinnacle of your sport. Ironically enough.
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2010, 11:39 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,131
better to know what they plan ahead of time, names, tactics etc. its a good article to let the public know whats going on

I am sure the article will rouse and round up pro-olympic people and give them more reason to drown out the anti-olympic ones

will be interesting
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2010, 12:05 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,828
This add was just posted on craigslist:


In preparation for the 2010 Olympics, Vancouver police are out in full swing silencing protestors, harassing and intimidating innocent civilians while using unjust techniques to lock up the homeless population. Operation Press Record is intended to call upon ANY citizen of Vancouver or travelling visitors to the city to carry a Video Camera with them AT ALL TIMES and document any footage of authorities abusing their power, using violent or any other ILLEGAL tactic that go against our human rights.

In addition to documenting illegal tactics by the Police, it will put the authorities in an awkward situation as if they target individuals holding camcorders & cameras, they will also be targeting those tourists who will be visiting the city for the games, which could erupt a PR nightmare on the Vancouver Police.

Operation Record was not created to be anti-police because like everything in life - there are good people and bad people and to generalize any group as having one characteristic is foolish. The intention of this operation however is to protect citizens from their rights of freedom of speech and to protect the homeless from being treated unjustly while reminding authorities that they also have to abide by the LAW and are not above it.

If you have a video camera - get to Vancouver for the 2010 Olympics and perform your duties as a protector of human rights by PRESSING RECORD. We need video cameras EVERYWHERE. We need so many video cameras that we have individuals recording the people recording the police. It is only through the power of the LENS that we can protect our fellow citizens, our future childrens rights and stop authorities from abusing their power through a peaceful manner.


www.pressrecord.ca


http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/va...578518324.html

I find this stuff so funny. I am not 100% pro police (for I know there are bad apples in every bunch) but how about also demanding people to be filming the protesters to ensure they also don't break the law and cause destruction.

That is what I find so funny, protesters who demand vandalism and arson are not protesters anymore, they are terrorists. And are they not essentially becoming the evil they are trying to protest? Are they not protesting "militant forces" by becoming a "militant force" themselves?????
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2010, 12:08 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,131
and the kicker is so that they can lord over and keep repressed the poor people which they use as pawns
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2010, 12:11 AM
NetMapel's Avatar
NetMapel NetMapel is offline
Hello World
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,522
With crazy protesters like this, I think I should probably fear for my life on my travel route as a volunteer. They sound ruthless.
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2010, 12:17 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
What makes Vancouver such a factory for hippies, delusional leftist individuals, radicalists and anarchists?
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2010, 12:18 AM
Stingray2004's Avatar
Stingray2004 Stingray2004 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: White Rock, BC (Metro Vancouver)
Posts: 3,145
I would suggest that any protestor would be concerned about their own safety considering that 50,000 - 100,000 people will be milling about the downtown core enjoying the festivities and don't want their fun being disrupted.

Quote:
Sozan Savehilaghi is a spokesperson for the 2010 Welcoming Committee, a coalition of anti-Olympic groups that's staging the rally.

The coalition is endorsed by dozens of activist organizations including the Anti-Poverty Committee, 2010 Watch and StopWar.ca to the UBC Network of Sri Lankan Law Students, the West End Wild Animal Alliance and Workers Communist Party of Iran.
http://www2.canada.com/vancouvercour...1-9b46298c18de

Alot of odd ducks in that lot.
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2010, 12:19 AM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x View Post
What makes Vancouver such a factory for hippies, delusional leftist individuals, radicalists and anarchists?
Warm weather, free housing, and other handouts that allow them to concentrate on "important" things like protesting.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stingray2004 View Post
I would suggest that any protestor would be concerned about their own safety considering that 50,000 - 100,000 people will be milling about the downtown core enjoying the festivities and don't want their fun being disrupted.



http://www2.canada.com/vancouvercour...1-9b46298c18de

Alot of odd ducks in that lot.
That's another thing about protests in Vancouver. They are so aimless. Half the people there will have anti-war, anti-fur, anti-everything but Olympic signs.
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2010, 12:23 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,131
BC has long been a union hotbed and the unions have a huge strength here

the hippie movement was here and still thrives on some of the islands
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2010, 12:25 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,828
Hehe, reminds me of the south park joke where the protester walks in with his sign, asks what they are protesting today, and quickly re-writes today's theme on his sign.

Bottom line is people have it so good in Canada (especially with Vancouver and Victoria with the mild weather) that they get bored very quickly and feel they need to protest something.

The funny thing is while they are protesting all of these b.s. causes there are real causes happening that do need public attention.

And no, I do not blame the "Unions" for our B.S. hippie protesting. Nice try though.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2010, 12:42 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2010, 1:02 AM
EdinVan EdinVan is offline
EdInVan
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sodom and Gomorrah
Posts: 785
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x View Post
Why the Vancouver Sun published such a long article about the anti-2010 lunatics is beyond me...though it speaks quite a bit about the state of the media and its rather cynical and delusional world view:
A more appropriate question would be why you people are taking so much space to comment on something when it's clear that you all agree with one another anyway. The Sun caters to a particular kind of reader, and this forum caters to a different kind. Both outlets are echo-chambers and waste time and space confirming their own opinions. Neither is better than the other, so I wouldn't be chastising the Sun any more than I would be chastising many of the forumers on here.
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2010, 1:09 AM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
Yes, because, being against violence, arson, and vandalism is such a radical viewpoint that only the fringe elements contained on this forum could have

Does the Sun really have a "bias" towards violence, arson, and vandalism? They are Olympic sponsors, afterall.

Which happens to actually make them a target of that violence, arson, and vandalism, as the ORN has pledged.
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2010, 1:20 AM
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth Smooth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 906
Sounds like a good opportunity for the VPD to test out their recently acquired sonic cannon... I mean "long-range acoustic device".

http://www.theprovince.com/Vancouver...126/story.html

I think if the police fire this up then the protesters will be longing for the good old pepper spray days.
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2010, 1:47 AM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
They already caved to the pressure and said they wouldn't use that, like 2 days after they announced it.

You wouldn't want to treat people who are throwing things at you and charging at you somewhat "inhumanely" by playing a loud noise.

Canada's such a wimp Which is why they'll have free reign to pretty much disrupt any event, and block any road they want.
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2010, 2:07 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yume-sama View Post
They already caved to the pressure and said they wouldn't use that, like 2 days after they announced it.

You wouldn't want to treat people who are throwing things at you and charging at you somewhat "inhumanely" by playing a loud noise.

Canada's such a wimp Which is why they'll have free reign to pretty much disrupt any event, and block any road they want.
I wouldn't exactly lump in all of Canada...I would say Vancouver is a wimp. Sad to hear that the VPD won't be using this device - why did they buy it in the first place????!!!!!!!
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2010, 2:24 AM
invisibleairwaves's Avatar
invisibleairwaves invisibleairwaves is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 638
Protesting the Olympics is really pretty futile at this point. But it's still perfectly valid to have concerns about Olympic security and privacy, and how the police will treat peaceful protesters. Remember that this is the largest peacetime security operation in Canadian history.

I'm glad the sonic cannons were pulled; those have absolutely no place in an ostensibly free and democratic society. Let's hope the VPD keeps up a tactful approach. If it turns out they're using agents provocateurs, I swear, I'll be tempted to go downtown myself with a few Molotov cocktails.
__________________
Reticulating Splines
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > 2010 Olympic Winter Games [Archive]
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:19 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.