HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2013, 4:06 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
Are Renderings Bad for Architecture?

Are Renderings Bad for Architecture?


06 Jun 2013

By Vanessa Quirk



Read More: http://www.archdaily.com/383325/are-...-architecture/

Quote:
At the opening of a recent article for The Guardian, Olly Wainwright finds himself observing a slew of thesis projects produced by the best and brightest students of the UK. But Wainwright is most struck – not by the display of technical skill or imagination – but by the sheer lack of connection these projects had with actual, built, imperfect architecture: “Time and again, the projects seemed intent on fleeing the real world of people and places, scale and context; retreating instead into fantasy realms of convoluted forms with no seeming purpose.”

It’s a trap that many Architecture schools have fallen into, in the UK and around the world, but it’s not just a symptom of the misguided nature of architecture education. It’s also symptomatic of Architecture’s obsession with the image of architecture, an image completely detached from reality. The idea of the perfect architectural image is not only propagated by professors who prioritize the rendering over its practical implications (causing students to spend hours perfecting visuals instead of perfecting the design), but also by the architecture media (and yes, we include ourselves in that category). Architecture media presents a flood of glossy shots that “sell” an idealized architecture to the public and, frankly, architects themselves.

In his essay “Digital Deception”, written for Design Observer, Belmont Freeman laments this obsession with the perfect, photo-shopped image, which has become – thanks to technology – far too easy to achieve: “our eyes are trained to believe that a photograph is a true representation of an existing condition. Thus in the digital age the graphic representation of architecture has moved beyond an exercise in persuasion; it has become an exercise in deception. [... The architect] has every incentive to indulge in digital dissimulation and little risk in doing so. Photoshop and similar software have become the architectural profession’s pharmacy of performance-enhancers; impossible to detect and absolutely ubiquitous.”

Freeman’s point of “deception” is an important one. I believe architects have bought into this idealization of the image not just because of their education or the influence of the media, but also, as I suggest in my review of CLOG: Rendering, because it’s a therapeutic act of self-deception. Working on the theories of Jonah Hill, I write that photo-shopping “allows the architect to see his work as it was before being built, an un-compromised vision.” The danger of this is that, in the end, as CLOG contributor Wenzel says, “the image exists independent of the concept, to be evaluated as a graphic. Architecture by graphic design” (Wenzel 73). In other words, the architecture itself is erased, eclipsed by its image. And that has real consequences. As Freeman puts it: “I fear that the proliferation of such photographs leads clients and the public at large to expect from architecture and architects a degree of quality — perfection — that is impossible to deliver in the real world.”

.....



Hotel + Congress Center Proposal






schmidt hammer lassen architects’ rendering of their Waterfront Development in Shanghai.






Skidmore, Owings, & Merrill’s rendering for a possible Penn Station.

__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2013, 8:09 PM
ThatOneGuy's Avatar
ThatOneGuy ThatOneGuy is offline
Come As You Are
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Constanta
Posts: 920
That congress Center looks amazing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2013, 8:31 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,344
I think the big problem with renderings is that what looks great as a 10-inch picture is entirely different from what looks great standing on a sidewalk. The scale of details you see is not even close to the same. In photos we like repetition and simplicity. In reality we like surprise and complexity.

I have no idea how to fix that, short of the invention of holodecs.
__________________
writing | twitter | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2013, 9:46 PM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,945
Is that a nebula in Shanghai? Or is that nighttime smog?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2013, 12:06 AM
Jasoncw's Avatar
Jasoncw Jasoncw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 402
I think the issue of renderings is not a new one

There was hugh ferris's art deco renderings which are very heavy on style and image but don't really relate very well with what was actually built.

Before that, while not renderings, there were neoclassical drawings of varying kinds, plans, elevations.

So the issue is not over renderings specifically, but rather architectural representation, and this has been an issue for a long time, and ultimately it's been shown to not really matter a whole ton.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2013, 5:40 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by animatedmartian View Post
Is that a nebula in Shanghai? Or is that nighttime smog?
The author is trying to show aspects of both day and night-time view. It's a composite of two images where some parts come from the day view and some from the night view.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:15 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.