HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2011, 11:16 AM
bornagainbiking bornagainbiking is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Hamilton
Posts: 805
NDP & Liberal Merge

Good, bad or Ugly. This will be one big task especially after the NDP & BQ merge. Try and meld that platform and find a mutually agreed upon leader. Good luck, it will be interesting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2011, 2:39 PM
Jamaican-Phoenix's Avatar
Jamaican-Phoenix Jamaican-Phoenix is offline
R2-D2's army of death
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Downtown Ottawa
Posts: 3,576
Hey, if the moderate PC's and radical Reform/Alliance can come together, it's not inconceivable for the split left to do so as well.
__________________
Franky: Ajldub, name calling is what they do when good arguments can't be found - don't sink to their level. Claiming the thread is "boring" is also a way to try to discredit a thread that doesn't match their particular bias.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2011, 3:31 PM
osmo osmo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,716
This would be ideal for Harper and Cons. I honestly think its what they pray for each night. A sided Left-right Parliament with no rules to limit corporate and labour influences would be the final nail in our already flimsy democratic system. It would turn into the laughable circus Americans have. I wouldn't be a big fan of it, it seems like a natural thing to do but having a odd number of parties IMO is ideal to keeping things in order.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2011, 3:44 PM
jigglysquishy's Avatar
jigglysquishy jigglysquishy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,326
The PC and Reform merger is one of the most politically devastating things to happen to this country politically.

And NDP & Liberal merger would just increase that damage.

Imagine a Canada where only two political parties exist. That's not the Canada I want to live in.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2011, 5:04 PM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
They should all merge into one party. They're all pretty much the same, and whoever is in charge with a majority will have almost absolute power, so why even bother with democracy? Everyone complains about having to vote, anyway. With a dictator, we wouldn't have to spend $300,000,000 on an election ever again!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2011, 5:08 PM
Spocket's Avatar
Spocket Spocket is offline
Back from the dead
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,508
If the NDP merged with the Liberals then a lot of people who consider themselves centrists would probably choose to simply not vote or , conversely , vote Conservative . As we've seen , with the Liberals devastated through poor leadership , people simply migrated to the NDP . When the Liberals choose a better leader they'll probably recapture parliament . Personally I think they're being rather hasty .

Either way , I despise the NDP but will vote Liberal . A merger would definitely force me to either vote Conservative perpetually or abstain altogether .

@ Freeweed ,

Don't worry , I know you didn't mean to include my comment .
__________________
Giving you a reason to drink and drive since 1975.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2011, 5:09 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,566
Gotta say I completely agree with the last 2 comments. Personally I'd love to see 4, 5, 6 parties in the HoC. Let's force some damn coalitions. The best thing Jack and the NDP ever did was act as a check on the Harper minority. Forcing them to actually compromise.

But then again, I'm a believer in "the government that governs least governs best". Majority parliaments are horrible for the country, tons of pointless new legislation gets passed. Just look at the morass the US is in - they pretty much have perpetual majority governments, and it's destroying their country.

Taking this one step further, I'd also be in favour of banning the political party as a concept. Let our representatives REPRESENT US. Not whatever particular allegiance they've happened to align with this month (switching parties because it's politically expedient is one of the most heinous things they do).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2011, 5:13 PM
PoscStudent's Avatar
PoscStudent PoscStudent is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: St. John's
Posts: 3,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamaican-Phoenix View Post
Hey, if the moderate PC's and radical Reform/Alliance can come together, it's not inconceivable for the split left to do so as well.
The Reform/Canadian Alliance and the Progressive Conservatives had been one party though that split up. The NDP and Liberals were never one party.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2011, 6:18 PM
osmo osmo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post
Gotta say I completely agree with the last 2 comments. Personally I'd love to see 4, 5, 6 parties in the HoC. Let's force some damn coalitions. The best thing Jack and the NDP ever did was act as a check on the Harper minority. Forcing them to actually compromise.

But then again, I'm a believer in "the government that governs least governs best". Majority parliaments are horrible for the country, tons of pointless new legislation gets passed. Just look at the morass the US is in - they pretty much have perpetual majority governments, and it's destroying their country.
I do agree with most of this. I guess its why I get labeled a Small 'c' con or a libertarian. I'm neither.

But back on topic here I do find that countries with a strong history of coalitions have policy that greater reflects their people. The only downside is that the process becomes even more muddy and bogged down, but governance is never pretty, nor sexy so I would be open to the idea of having 5 or 6 parties.

If the greens we're actually progressive and not just Conservatives who shop at Whole Foods maybe they would be a bigger voice on the hill.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2011, 6:29 PM
Spocket's Avatar
Spocket Spocket is offline
Back from the dead
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post

Taking this one step further, I'd also be in favour of banning the political party as a concept. Let our representatives REPRESENT US.
I've never been able to figure out why nobody seems able to make this idea work . I mean , I know the deal and I know why it isn't that way but really , how is it democratic to cast a vote that benefits somebody I may not be particularly keen on ?
__________________
Giving you a reason to drink and drive since 1975.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2011, 7:12 PM
Aylmer's Avatar
Aylmer Aylmer is offline
Still optimistic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montreal (C-D-N) / Ottawa (Aylmer)
Posts: 5,383
This is a tough question for me: I've got to somehow reconcile my wish for more parties and more cooperation within the HoC and my concerns with the current Government's policies and ethics.

Maybe one party could not present candidates in certain ridings to the benefit of the other party who would do the same in other ridings and form a coalition for a parliament. After all, it was the vote split that has kept Mr.Harper in power, not Conservatives.
__________________
I've always struggled with reality. And I'm pleased to say that I won.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2011, 7:29 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylmer View Post
After all, it was the vote split that has kept Mr.Harper in power, not Conservatives.
The founding of the Reform party was basically what gave Cretien majority after majority. It's a pretty common theme in Canadian politics of late.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2011, 9:08 PM
Aylmer's Avatar
Aylmer Aylmer is offline
Still optimistic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montreal (C-D-N) / Ottawa (Aylmer)
Posts: 5,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post
The founding of the Reform party was basically what gave Cretien majority after majority. It's a pretty common theme in Canadian politics of late.
Which is why we need to have proportional representation (Swing seats and whatnot). Things like these don't happen in Germany or New Zealand for a reason.
__________________
I've always struggled with reality. And I'm pleased to say that I won.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2011, 10:31 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylmer View Post
Which is why we need to have proportional representation (Swing seats and whatnot). Things like these don't happen in Germany or New Zealand for a reason.
Pretty much this. If we had PR the results would make a bit more sense, and the likelihood for a majority increases.

I'm all for more parties in the HoC. More people and different views needs to be represented, instead of just the bland left v. right. America has one of the most boring political setups solely because of their Democrats v. Republicans. I prefer when races are between three to four candidates instead of just two.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2011, 10:55 PM
ckkelley's Avatar
ckkelley ckkelley is offline
Bridge Walker!
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Forest City
Posts: 1,037
I don't think it'll ever happen. There's too many blue Liberals and too many orange NDPers.
__________________
Just chimin' in.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2011, 4:57 AM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 22,283
Won't happen. The NDP is already fracturing in the face of the upcoming leadership contest.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2011, 11:05 AM
Aylmer's Avatar
Aylmer Aylmer is offline
Still optimistic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montreal (C-D-N) / Ottawa (Aylmer)
Posts: 5,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregHickman View Post
Pretty much this. If we had PR the results would make a bit more sense, and the likelihood for a majority increases.
Actually, it would let smaller parties get into the house with more ease. The chances of a majority would actually be smaller with a PRep system.
__________________
I've always struggled with reality. And I'm pleased to say that I won.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2011, 11:33 AM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylmer View Post
Actually, it would let smaller parties get into the house with more ease. The chances of a majority would actually be smaller with a PRep system.
Right, right, PR. I had my electoral systems mixed up for a second.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2011, 1:57 PM
samne's Avatar
samne samne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastend
Posts: 3,729
Wont and shouldnt happen.

Liberals are a centrist party. This is why they have done so historically well. Its a balanced approach.

They have almost as much in common with the NDP as they do the Cons.

Alot of NDP and Cons would like to portray the Liberals as a dead. Cons would love nothing more than a Lib/NDP merger, cause it would be them vs. the "Socialists". The NDP would solidify themselves as a potential government in waiting and not some one-off.

Federally the Liberals have some issues. However, lets not forget that Liberals currently govern the Canada's 3 largest provinces.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2011, 2:29 PM
PoscStudent's Avatar
PoscStudent PoscStudent is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: St. John's
Posts: 3,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by samne View Post
Federally the Liberals have some issues. However, lets not forget that Liberals currently govern the Canada's 3 largest provinces.
Not really. The BC Liberals are a party made up of federal Liberals and federal Conservatives, though Christy Clark has ties with the federal Liberals. The party has no affiliation with the Liberals and I believe I heard a stat that 60% of BC Liberals support the Conservatives.

The Quebec Liberals are a federalist party made up of federal Liberals, Conservatives and New Democrats. Jean Charest is the former Progressive Conservative leader. The party also has so affiliation with the federal Liberals.

The Ontario Liberals are most closely aligned with the Federal Liberals, though they still haven't been affiliated since the 80's.

As well none of these parties are very popular is their provinces.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:18 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.