HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #141  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2017, 11:43 PM
Antigonish Antigonish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home sweet home
Posts: 763
http://globalnews.ca/news/3268281/as...y-citizenship/

This is a step in the right direction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #142  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2017, 2:44 AM
Aylmer's Avatar
Aylmer Aylmer is online now
Still optimistic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montreal (C-D-N) / Ottawa (Aylmer)
Posts: 5,383
If you read past the title, you'll see that this isn't a step in any direction. This has been the standard procedure since forever.
__________________
I've always struggled with reality. And I'm pleased to say that I won.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #143  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2017, 6:31 AM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 11,479
Our system is actually fairly good at deporting people with bogus asylum claims. And it does so pretty quickly too.. it's actually a lot more efficient at that than the American system.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #144  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2017, 8:27 AM
shreddog shreddog is offline
Beer me Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Taking a Pis fer all of ya
Posts: 5,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylmer View Post
If you read past the title, you'll see that this isn't a step in any direction. This has been the standard procedure since forever.
And if you scroll through the photos in the article, you'll see some key messages associated with the story.

For me these are probably the most powerful photos ...





I can't imagine a more "anti Trump" photo
__________________
Leaving a Pis fer all of ya!

Do something about your future.

Last edited by shreddog; Feb 24, 2017 at 8:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #145  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2017, 10:25 AM
Aylmer's Avatar
Aylmer Aylmer is online now
Still optimistic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montreal (C-D-N) / Ottawa (Aylmer)
Posts: 5,383
I have to admit, that last photo tugs at my heartstrings. In a more emotional way, I really do hope that our country can live up to that picture : solidarity, openness and good humour in the face of adversity. These next few years will be a true test of our national character. I really hope that once we get through it, we will still be able to look at that photo and say "yup, we're still Canada".

I'm certain not everyone will agree with me. But unlike many of my posts, this is just about the way I feel about the situation.
__________________
I've always struggled with reality. And I'm pleased to say that I won.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #146  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2017, 1:31 PM
JM5 JM5 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylmer View Post
There aren't any legal barriers we can put up. If you stand 1cm outside the border, the RCMP has no jurisdiction to stop you. Once you're more than halfway over the border, the Charter guarantees you rights, which, as the Supreme Court has ruled several times, means that the government can't send you someplace where there is a clear causal link between deportation and persecution.
This, I think is the source of many people's concerns. While I of course don't know if the influx of asylum seekers will ever really reach a rate that threatens our society, and I do hope it doesn't; you have to admit that in a legal sense we've painted ourselves into a corner. Should we experience a wave of migrants similar to Europe recently, I'm sure we can take some form of legal action/legislative changes that eventually hardens our borders but these things take time and in a real sense it may be too late.

I for one, would prefer a set of laws and treaty obligations that maintain our sovereignty, and allow us to vet asylum seekers before they set foot on Canadian soil. All those who have a legitimate claim will be admitted as per the UN convention. I know it's been mentioned before but Australia did this. We're not an island nation, so we would need to enforce laws that make what's currently happening illegal and force asylum seekers to the legal entry points. This is what I've been arguing all along because this puts Canadians back in the driving seat.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #147  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2017, 3:14 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is online now
Unapologetic Occidental
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 68,131
Seems to me that asking the government to "do something!" about the flow of migrants to the border is almost like asking them to control the amount of rain that is going to fall.

That said, I think the fears of a migrant flood similar to that seen in Europe are greatly exaggerated.

Baden Powell had the best advice on this one: "be prepared".
__________________
The Last Word.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #148  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2017, 3:25 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ As far as refugee migrations go, the one trickling into Quebec in Manitoba is a tiny, almost imperceptible one. It's just triggering a huge reaction in some circles because we're simply not used to the sight of people coming in from the south to seek asylum. The random Africans coming into a small town like Emerson in the dead of night is just not something that anyone ever envisioned.

The reality is that we won't see a that stream turn into a huge flood because it's simply not that easy for would be asylum seekers to get into the US to begin with.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #149  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2017, 5:25 PM
speedog's Avatar
speedog speedog is offline
Moran supreme
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ As far as refugee migrations go, the one trickling into Quebec in Manitoba is a tiny, almost imperceptible one. It's just triggering a huge reaction in some circles because we're simply not used to the sight of people coming in from the south to seek asylum. The random Africans coming into a small town like Emerson in the dead of night is just not something that anyone ever envisioned.

The reality is that we won't see a that stream turn into a huge flood because it's simply not that easy for would be asylum seekers to get into the US to begin with.
True enough but if it was your door that's being knocked on at 3:00 in the morning by someone walking across the border and this was now happening with some regularity, you most likely would have a different viewpoint.
__________________
Just a wee bit below average prairie boy in Canada's third largest city and fourth largest CMA
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #150  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2017, 5:41 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedog View Post
True enough but if it was your door that's being knocked on at 3:00 in the morning by someone walking across the border and this was now happening with some regularity, you most likely would have a different viewpoint.
Fair enough. I'm not saying the townsfolk of Emerson don't have a legitimate beef with having to shoulder much of the burden associated with this (mind you, they've been handling it with remarkable compassion and generosity), I'm thinking of it more in the national context. The way some people are reacting, you would think we were Greece or Turkey with thousands upon thousands streaming in.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #151  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2017, 4:04 PM
JM5 JM5 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 429
Here's CBC article with suggestions on what steps to take to fix our current border laws:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manito...gees-1.3998088

I'm posting this because the writer's views happen to agree with my own.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #152  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2017, 12:05 AM
eternallyme eternallyme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,243
However, this poll (Quebec only) suggests opportunity may be knocking there if a party can exploit the issue (55% of Quebecers take the Donald Trump position on immigration, and 75% want a crackdown on illegal migrants):

http://montrealgazette.com/news/loca...migration-poll

Those numbers do seem high - I would think they might have oversampled outside of Greater Montreal?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #153  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2017, 12:50 AM
gilbatrov gilbatrov is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1
The question that poll asks is essentially "should we increase immigration in response to Donald Trump's policies?" to which 55% answered no, 36% answered yes, and 9% were unsure. It doesn't ask if immigration in general should be stopped. By world standards 36% is actually a pretty high percentage who would be open to increasing immigration.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #154  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2017, 10:07 PM
BobLoblawsLawBlog's Avatar
BobLoblawsLawBlog BobLoblawsLawBlog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylmer View Post
I have to admit, that last photo tugs at my heartstrings. In a more emotional way, I really do hope that our country can live up to that picture : solidarity, openness and good humour in the face of adversity. These next few years will be a true test of our national character. I really hope that once we get through it, we will still be able to look at that photo and say "yup, we're still Canada".

I'm certain not everyone will agree with me. But unlike many of my posts, this is just about the way I feel about the situation.
Okay, so a President wants to follow the law and make it easier for people to immigrate LEGALLY and this is some sort of widespread oppression that Canada has to fight? Wtf? If you are fine with letting people enter a country illegally and not enforce borders you shouldn't lock your doors and night and you shouldn't kick out squatters in that enter your house.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #155  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2017, 10:11 PM
BretttheRiderFan's Avatar
BretttheRiderFan BretttheRiderFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,667
Just so we're all clear here: Canadian laws are being enforced.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #156  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2017, 7:19 AM
JM5 JM5 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 429
Quote:
Originally Posted by BretttheRiderFan View Post
Just so we're all clear here: Canadian laws are being enforced.
Yeah, I watched Goodale's speech this morning. Had to shake my head, I mean, way to dodge the issue. Point is though, there's nothing to worry about at this point so no solid reason to change any laws or bilateral agreements. Hopefully it stays this way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #157  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2017, 8:17 AM
Pinus Pinus is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by JM5 View Post
Yeah, I watched Goodale's speech this morning. Had to shake my head, I mean, way to dodge the issue. Point is though, there's nothing to worry about at this point so no solid reason to change any laws or bilateral agreements. Hopefully it stays this way.
I'm deeply dissapointed that we as a nation are willing to take these kinds of risks to our national security. This whole situation makes us extremely vulnerable.

If things get out of control ans shit it's the fan, we have nobody to blame but ourselves.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #158  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2017, 8:43 AM
JM5 JM5 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinus View Post
I'm deeply dissapointed that we as a nation are willing to take these kinds of risks to our national security. This whole situation makes us extremely vulnerable.

If things get out of control ans shit it's the fan, we have nobody to blame but ourselves.
Your point is entirely valid, but to quote Acajack in the Multiculturalism thread:
"Don't worry about the rocks ahead. We've seen rocks before and always managed to avoid them. No need to use the rudder at this point."

We have become aware of a potential problem early. Let's not act brashly and loose face in front of the international community just yet and agree to keep an eye on the situation. It's just a question of how much faith you have that our politicians will act if things take a turn... and with Trudeau at the helm, I agree that there is some cause for concern. I'm just not too worried yet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #159  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2017, 3:00 PM
BretttheRiderFan's Avatar
BretttheRiderFan BretttheRiderFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,667
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinus View Post
I'm deeply dissapointed that we as a nation are willing to take these kinds of risks to our national security. This whole situation makes us extremely vulnerable.

If things get out of control ans shit it's the fan, we have nobody to blame but ourselves.
Calm down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #160  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2017, 5:59 AM
Pinus Pinus is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by BretttheRiderFan View Post
Calm down.
No, I will not calm down. I will continue to vocalise my opposition to this stupidity of our government putting us at risk because of the "we are "Canada" malarchy. Just because we are "Canada" does not mean we have to be a doormat to the US and the rest of the world. We can still be a welcoming nation to everyone, however we do not need to willingly allow people from the United States cross our border illegally. These people are not refugees. I will never change my stance and there does seem to be a growing number of Canadians who are finally seeing the light on this matter and wanting our government to put Canadians first. These people are not Canada's problem; they belong to the US and are their problem. Send them back to the US.

Time to grow some balls Canada.

Last edited by Pinus; Mar 6, 2017 at 6:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:26 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.