HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    7 Bryant Park in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2012, 4:59 AM
THE BIG APPLE's Avatar
THE BIG APPLE THE BIG APPLE is offline
Khurram Parvaz
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,424
The height hasn't been announced yet, but for a 450,000 sq ft tower, the 250-300 foot mark sounds about right. I'm sure the aerodynamics of the building can make it go above the 300+ foot mark.

Wasn't there at least 100,000 sq ft of air rights above the demolished building.

Last edited by THE BIG APPLE; Feb 23, 2012 at 5:11 AM.
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2012, 2:47 PM
yankeesfan1000 yankeesfan1000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 10014
Posts: 1,617
The video is amazing, thanks RW. Definitely worth checking out.

http://www.7bryantpark.com/tour/
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2012, 2:56 PM
RobertWalpole RobertWalpole is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,911
My pleasure, sir.
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2012, 2:59 PM
sbarn sbarn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,071
Damn, that was a good video. I want to work there...
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2012, 1:02 AM
reencharles's Avatar
reencharles reencharles is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 274
The video is excellent. Despite being a low building, will be a good fill. I loved the lighting at night, will combine with the BOA.
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2012, 2:10 AM
THE BIG APPLE's Avatar
THE BIG APPLE THE BIG APPLE is offline
Khurram Parvaz
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,424
This will be a good back drop to the SW portion of Bryant Park, as the BoA Tower is to the NW portion.
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2012, 3:01 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,374
Yeah both the building & the video are pretty slick. Anyone else notice that the "7" logo is referencing the concave notch in the design?
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2012, 4:09 AM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE BIG APPLE View Post
The height hasn't been announced yet, but for a 450,000 sq ft tower, the 250-300 foot mark sounds about right.
The building will be 450 ft.

It's both listed at the website and at NYC DOB.
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2012, 5:43 AM
NYC2ATX's Avatar
NYC2ATX NYC2ATX is offline
Everywhere all at once
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SI NYC
Posts: 2,450
AHHHH LOVE THE EVENING LIGHTING. It will totally bounce off of Bank of America Tower perfectly. They'll be like big brother and little brother. As if Bryant Park weren't already a remarkable location, this will help make it an unmatched urban space.
__________________
BUILD IT. BUILD EVERYTHING. BUILD IT ALL.
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2012, 1:30 PM
THE BIG APPLE's Avatar
THE BIG APPLE THE BIG APPLE is offline
Khurram Parvaz
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,424
450 feet is FINE. I'm not complaining, but it seems a bit high for a 450k sq ft tower. Maybe the configuration is a bit different, and the aesthetics.
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2012, 2:43 PM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE BIG APPLE View Post
450 feet is FINE. I'm not complaining, but it seems a bit high for a 450k sq ft tower. Maybe the configuration is a bit different, and the aesthetics.
There are 700-foot towers that are only 250,000 square feet. And, as you can see from the rendering, 7 Bryant Park isn't particularly fat nor thin.
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2012, 2:49 PM
THE BIG APPLE's Avatar
THE BIG APPLE THE BIG APPLE is offline
Khurram Parvaz
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,424
^ Yeah but those 700 footers are thinner and taller, thus most of the space is mechanical, and the tower is thin so it is equivalent to 250k sq ft. A 'normal' configuration for example is the ESB which is 1,250 ft tall and is over 2 million sq ft.
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2012, 5:06 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
^ The video did advertise high floors heights, which would make sense for an office building.
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2012, 5:20 PM
THE BIG APPLE's Avatar
THE BIG APPLE THE BIG APPLE is offline
Khurram Parvaz
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,424
^ High floor to ceiling heights make more sense in residential buildings, but office buildings (in modern day) have had higher f-to-c heights, than compared to long ago.
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2012, 1:59 PM
RobertWalpole RobertWalpole is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,911
I'd like to see Chadborne anchor this tower.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/busines...ntent=Business
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2012, 2:48 AM
NOPA NOPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 320
This is a handsome tower! I'd certainly prefer it to be a bit taller but oh well.

Also, I think higher office f-to-c heights are certainly the new trend... I read interesting article on office space design in San Francisco that mentions this. Tech firms are locating in the trendy SOMA district (think warehouses, lofts, etc) while the traditional Financial District is losing out.

http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/deve...ma-destination
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2012, 11:21 PM
RobertWalpole RobertWalpole is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,911
Many permits we're filed with the DoB last week. I wonder if Hines has a tenant.
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2012, 12:12 AM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
World Machine
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY/CT
Posts: 6,749
I imagine this one will get jumped on . . that is a very desirable area that's located in relatively respectable proximity to GCT and Penn.
__________________
"I'm going there, but I like it here wherever it is.."
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2012, 12:39 AM
babybackribs2314 babybackribs2314 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UWS, Manhattan
Posts: 1,728
My blurb:

http://newyorkyimby.blogspot.com/201...ixth.html#more

The permits indicate the building will be 29 stories and 441' high, so at least we have an official height on this one!
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2012, 12:48 AM
yankeesfan1000 yankeesfan1000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 10014
Posts: 1,617
Agreed, if I remember correctly Hines was always planning on building this without a major tenant. This is a perfect location for Chadbourne & Park who's deal at 1 WTC fell through because they didn't want to relocate downtown and their board strongly preferred a midtown location.

Really recommend looking through the videos and renders on the website: http://www.7bryantpark.com/
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:57 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.