Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan
chicago doesn't do anything uniformly, until you get out into the bungalow belt, and then the uniformity out there can be almost mind-numbing.
|
I think this is gonna be the case in most cities. Continuous, uniform urbanism for anything other than single-family homes is very rare in the US. At most, you might get an unbroken block like that block of Normandie in LA. But in most other cities, you will have vestigial houses, schools, churches, and low-rise commercial breaking up the streetscape, and each of these will have its own parking lot as well as any new housing developments built since WW2 and city zoning codes mandating parking. Even if neighborhoods did look something out of NYC at one point, they haven't remained in stasis.
The parking lot thing is especially pernicious... usually those blocks of apartment houses were built by a single developer and built in the 1920s or 30s with little or no parking, assuming tenants would ride the streetcar/bus. After WW2, the single developer-landlord had a very tough time renting out apartments without parking, or getting permits for renovations without meeting the city's parking requirements. So often they tear down one or several of the buildings to build dedicated tenant parking. The only exceptions to this would be in cities that maintained a strong transit system (very few) or possibly near college campuses where demand remains strong for low-parking apartments.
With those caveats, Portland's
NW Side seems to have a lot of pre-war apartment buildings. Same for
Capitol Hill in Denver. In many cities the norm for middle-class apartment living totally faded away so these areas often have a seedy reputation and a history of SROs and other housing for a transient population.