HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2081  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2009, 12:29 AM
Gordo's Avatar
Gordo Gordo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, WA/San Francisco, CA/Jackson Hole, WY
Posts: 4,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by fflint View Post
Yes, it's the small commercial building at Hayes and Market (the main tower at Fox Plaza will be unaffected). It is fair to say the proposal, at least, is "moving ahead in some way."
Do you happen to know if the new building will help mitigate the terrible wind tunnel effect caused by Fox Plaza?

I'll second BT's hope for a rendering
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2082  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2009, 5:43 AM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,552
Archstone Fox Plaza - wind

I have lived in the Fox Plaza for 38 years and well know the fierce winds on the street. I'm not an wind expert, but suspect that a new building on the corner of Hayes/Market Sts. would not change the wind pattern too much. The summer wind comes from the west down Hayes Street and would continue as usual after a new building on the corner. The winter wind comes mostly from the southeast and that would probably be quite noticeable on the east side of the building.

The Argenta does not seem to have made a big difference in the wind here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2083  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2009, 6:18 AM
peanut gallery's Avatar
peanut gallery peanut gallery is offline
Only Mostly Dead
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marin
Posts: 5,234
Oh, that space. I didn't even realize there was a proposal for that. Good because that is hideous. The SF Mart, on the other hand, is a beautiful building worth saving IMO.
__________________
My other car is a Dakota Creek Advanced Multihull Design.

Tiburon Miami 1 Miami 2 Ye Olde San Francisco SF: Canyons, waterfront... SF: South FiDi SF: South Park
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2084  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2009, 6:31 AM
Kingofthehill's Avatar
Kingofthehill Kingofthehill is offline
International
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oslo
Posts: 4,052
Hey guys, I'll be in SF in the coming days and was wondering if you had any nabe recommendations...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2085  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2009, 7:20 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
I love this one:

Quote:
550 18th Street Unwrapped (And 35 New Condos Now Renting)





A plugged-in tipster captures the recently unwrapped 550 18th Street.



That's thirty-five (35) new two and three bedroom Mission Bay condos ranging from 1,200 to 1,500 square feet, and currently seeking $3,500 to $5,500 per month in rent.

No word on the 7,000 square feet of ground floor commercial.
Source: http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2....html#comments
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2086  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2009, 8:16 PM
Gordo's Avatar
Gordo Gordo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, WA/San Francisco, CA/Jackson Hole, WY
Posts: 4,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingofthehill View Post
Hey guys, I'll be in SF in the coming days and was wondering if you had any nabe recommendations...
For what? Staying in? Visting? Eating? You've got to be more specific You should probably just make a thread outside of this one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2087  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2009, 9:30 PM
peanut gallery's Avatar
peanut gallery peanut gallery is offline
Only Mostly Dead
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marin
Posts: 5,234
I like it too, BT. At least the primary face. That one side (left in the first photo) is a little off, but that's a minor complaint. BTW, I posted this in the SF Misc construction thread.
__________________
My other car is a Dakota Creek Advanced Multihull Design.

Tiburon Miami 1 Miami 2 Ye Olde San Francisco SF: Canyons, waterfront... SF: South FiDi SF: South Park
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2088  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2009, 2:51 AM
peanut gallery's Avatar
peanut gallery peanut gallery is offline
Only Mostly Dead
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marin
Posts: 5,234
SPUR's Urban Center has its skin now:


It looks good within the streetscape:
__________________
My other car is a Dakota Creek Advanced Multihull Design.

Tiburon Miami 1 Miami 2 Ye Olde San Francisco SF: Canyons, waterfront... SF: South FiDi SF: South Park
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2089  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2009, 3:04 AM
peanut gallery's Avatar
peanut gallery peanut gallery is offline
Only Mostly Dead
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marin
Posts: 5,234
149 Mason today:


This is Glide's housing for the chronically homeless.
__________________
My other car is a Dakota Creek Advanced Multihull Design.

Tiburon Miami 1 Miami 2 Ye Olde San Francisco SF: Canyons, waterfront... SF: South FiDi SF: South Park

Last edited by peanut gallery; Mar 6, 2009 at 3:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2090  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2009, 3:38 AM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,097
I really like the design on 550 18th Street. Nice finishes, inside and out.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2091  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2009, 3:42 AM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by peanut gallery View Post
SPUR's Urban Center has its skin now:
I was actually wondering about that project yesterday. But I may as well use this opportunity to say the thing is a big disappointment to me. SPUR, of all people, should realize they have under-developed that lot. Anything on that part of Mission St. should be a lot taller. Only a non-profit would even think of such a non-economic project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2092  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2009, 4:01 AM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
Quote:
Thursday, March 5, 2009, 12:51pm PST | Modified: Thursday, March 5, 2009, 5:07pm
AF Evans Co. files Chapter 11
San Francisco Business Times - by Blanca Torres

Developer AF Evans Co. in Oakland said Thursday that it has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, citing plummeting house prices and the credit crunch.

“The total collapse of the condo market and a couple other things that happened overwhelmed this company,” said Art Evans, who started the business and is its chief executive and chairman. “We’re not happy to (file for bankruptcy). We’ve been trying to sell properties to pay off debts for two years … This gives us time, it’s all it does.”

The exact figures will be revealed in later court filings, but Evans estimated that the company has debt in excess of $50 million and has a plan for raising $35 million from selling properties and a portion of its interests in some properties.

The filing will not affect AF Evans’ property management or senior housing subsidiaries, and its development arm, AF Evans Development Inc. will keep looking for projects in the Bay Area.

The company employs about 550 and does not plan any layoffs associated with the bankruptcy, but had shed about 44 staff members from its Oakland headquarters over the last two years.

Started in 1977, the company focused on affordable and senior housing as well as apartment management for most of its history until about six years ago when it decided to add market-rate condominiums to its portfolio. It developed more than 10,000 housing units, many in the Bay Area.

Evans said the idea was to build “workforce” housing geared toward first-time home buyers and people slightly above the median income level. One of projects, Market Square in the Old Oakland neighborhood, sold well in its first phase. It’s second phase, however, lost money after a series of price reductions.

The company recently completed another would-be condo project at 901 Jefferson, which went into foreclosure with the lender.

AF Evans also has three projects going through the entitlement process in San Francisco, which has cost the company millions in fees and holding expenses.

“We saw the problem coming,” Evans said. “We would have worked our way through it had the market had not completely collapsed.”

Evans retired from leading the company’s day to day operations, but stayed on as chairman. He returned to running the firm in May of 2008.

“Going forward, we will be focused on property management, assisted living and on doing affordable housing,” Evans said. “I will stay with the company until it’s on its feet and emerges from bankruptcy healthy.”

Evans was honored in 2006 as a housing hero by the San Francisco Housing Action Coalition, a San Francisco nonprofit that advocates for smart growth.

“I’m heartbroken about the news about AF Evans,” said Tim Colen, executive director of SFHAC. “They are a remarkable company that did both market-rate and afford housing projects and did a terrific job with both. It’s stark testimony to the dire conditions we are up against.”

Architect David Baker, who worked with AF Evans on a 224-unit project at 888 Seventh St. and other projects, called Art Evans “a good guy and a great developer who really wants to do the right thing.”

“It’s a high reward and high risk business,” said Baker.


btorres@bizjournals.com / (415) 288-4960 | J.K. Dineen contributed to this story.
So what of 55 Laguna??

Quote:
55 Laguna . . . .



Unanimously approved by the Planning Commission in January, the redevelopment of almost six acres in Hayes Valley is on appeal and the project will be heard by San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors tomorrow (3/4/08) at 4pm. (the appeal was denied)



A former UC Berekely Extension campus, the development of 55 Laguna by A.F. Evans would raze two of the oldest existing buildings on the site but yield 413 new housing units: 328 apartments (66 affordable) and an 85-unit affordable development for seniors targeting the LGBT community (in partnership with OpenHouse).



The development would also include a 25,000-square-foot park, a 10,600-square-foot community garden, and a 12,000-square-foot community center.
Source: http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2...an_franci.html

Is this another example of SF's endless approval process dithering until the moment when the project could have got built is past?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2093  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2009, 5:45 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
Quote:
Friday, March 6, 2009
Developer gets ready to build hotel in S.F.
San Francisco Business Times - by J.K. Dineen

A developer is planning to start construction this year on a 172-room hotel at 942 Mission St. in San Francisco, despite a faltering tourism industry and credit crunch.

South San Francisco-based Mint Developers Inc. is proposing a 75,240-square-foot building on Mission Street between Fifth and Sixth streets. The hotel would be six stories on Mission Street and five stories on Jessie Street with a 15-story mid-block central portion, which would be set back 50 feet from Mission Street, according to planning documents and project architect Michael Stanton of Stanton Architecture.

“It is anticipated this hotel will go forward at a rapid pace as soon as it is approved by the planning commission,” said Stanton. “We have been instructed to be ready to begin working drawings as soon as that happens.”

The hotel would replace an 8,000-square-foot building that was headquarters for pornographic video company Kink.com. Kink.com moved to the old armory in the Mission district in 2007. A Mint affiliate, GMS Development, paid $6.5 million for the building last year.

Stanton said the detailing along Mission Street would “blend seamlessly with the adjacent residential buildings while it is envisioned that the rest of the building will be clad in factory finished metal panels imparting a more contemporary feel.” The sixth floor along Mission Street is proposed to be a green roof planted in California native grasses and other drought-tolerant plants. The hotel will be a three-star limited service hotel with 3,200 square feet of retail space. It will cater to Moscone conventioneers and will not have a restaurant bar, or meeting space.

The developer wants to keep a low profile. It has developed and operated hotels in the Bay Area for years, said Stanton. No decision has been made on an operator for the hotel.

If Mint Developers does break ground this year, it would likely be the only new hotel developed in San Francisco for several years, according to hotel consultant Rick Swig of San Francisco-based RSBA & Associates.

“Nobody but nobody is getting financing for construction of new hotels today, and nobody but nobody is going to get financing for new hotel construction for another year or longer,” said Swig.

On the other hand, if the developer can make it work economically, there will be demand for new hotel rooms in good locations targeting more budget-conscious travelers, Swig said. Due to high land and construction costs, recent hotel construction has focused on the high-end market, with projects like the St. Regis, the Four Seasons and the Intercontinental.
Source: http://sanfrancisco.bizjournals.com/...9/story11.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2094  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2009, 5:53 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
Quote:
A Rare Chance to Buy in the Tenderloin



This is novel: an eight-story, 37-unit market-rate development in the Tenderloin. Approved yesterday by the Planning Commission, 180 Jones will fill a long vacant parking lot with 15 1-bedroom units and 22 2-bedroom units, with two of each below market rate. As is the norm, fingers are crossed for "needed services" to fill the ground floor (translation: no liquor stores, k?). The project proposal pleased many a planning commissioner, as it was noted more than once that it would be bringing the possibility of homeownership to a neighborhood where it currently stands at less than 1 percent. Let's worry about finding those buyers later, shall we?
Source: http://sf.curbed.com/archives/2009/0...eader_comments
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2095  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2009, 6:13 PM
peanut gallery's Avatar
peanut gallery peanut gallery is offline
Only Mostly Dead
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marin
Posts: 5,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTinSF View Post
I was actually wondering about that project yesterday. But I may as well use this opportunity to say the thing is a big disappointment to me. SPUR, of all people, should realize they have under-developed that lot. Anything on that part of Mission St. should be a lot taller. Only a non-profit would even think of such a non-economic project.
My guess is they built to what they need and weren't interested in being a landlord to someone else. But certainly, anything on this stretch of Mission can be much taller than this.

I hope 55 Laguna moves forward, although that doesn't sound likely. It's a needed project and I love the central parkway. The building themselves are nothing special, but I thought the concept was a good one.
__________________
My other car is a Dakota Creek Advanced Multihull Design.

Tiburon Miami 1 Miami 2 Ye Olde San Francisco SF: Canyons, waterfront... SF: South FiDi SF: South Park
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2096  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2009, 7:34 PM
nequidnimis nequidnimis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 507
Not totally sure they could have built taller. The second building on the right is a high-rise and there may be code requirements for separation between high-rises. I know for sure there are such restrictions on Rincon Hill.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2097  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2009, 7:51 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by peanut gallery View Post
My guess is they built to what they need and weren't interested in being a landlord to someone else.
I'm sure that's true. That's what I meant by saying only a nonprofit would have done this. Non-profits can do what they need for their own requirements and not have to worry about efficient use of capital or assets.

Nequidnimis may well be right that FAR or some other code issue would have blocked any sort of true highrise but I'd think they could have done something more than 4 stories (or whatever it is).

By the way: Bonus points to anyone who can come up with a rendering of 942 Mission. I spent over an hour looking. If we can get a rendering, I'm thinking of making a thread for it in the "General Developments" section. At 15 stories, it doesn't qualify as a highrise but if it does get going this year it could be the most significant building to start in SF in 2009--significant not only because of size but also because of effect on its neighborhood (that area around 6th & Mission needs a turnaround bigtime).

Last edited by BTinSF; Mar 7, 2009 at 12:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2098  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2009, 8:49 PM
Gordo's Avatar
Gordo Gordo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, WA/San Francisco, CA/Jackson Hole, WY
Posts: 4,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTinSF View Post
By the way: Bonus points to anyone who can come up with a rendering of 942 Mission. I spent over an hour looking. If we can get a rendering, I'm thinking of making a thread for it in the "General Developments" section. At 15 stories, it doesn't qualify as a highrise but if it does get going this year it could be the most significant building to start in SF in 2009--significant not only because of size but also because of effect on its neighborhood (that area around 6th & Mission needs a turnaround bigtime).
Agreed. I'll say right now that if this is started this year, I will personally recommend this hotel to everyone I know for years, simply because the developer/hotelier is showing tremendous guts in two ways - building now AND building at that location. Bravo.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2099  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2009, 11:38 PM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,207
Re: 1390 Market--no rendering has crossed my desk, nor did I look for anything related to wind mitigation. I think the wind problem will exist as long as the main Fox Plaza tower exists.
__________________
"You need both a public and a private position." --Hillary Clinton, speaking behind closed doors to the National Multi-Family Housing Council, 2013
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2100  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2009, 3:15 PM
peanut gallery's Avatar
peanut gallery peanut gallery is offline
Only Mostly Dead
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marin
Posts: 5,234
File this headline under "No kidding." From today's Chronicle:

Quote:

Developers are hoping to build a condo project on this vacant lot on the southwest corner of 10th and Market streets.


Condominium units in the new and empty Argenta at the foot of Polk Street, across from 10th and Market, are now being marketed as rental apartments.

S.F. construction slows to a crawl
Robert Selna, Chronicle Staff Writer
Monday, March 9, 2009


Much can be learned about the San Francisco real estate market by taking a quick look at 10th and Market streets.

A high-rise condominium tower was supposed to be built on the excavated lot on the southwest corner. Across the street, a new - and still empty - 20-story condominium tower was unsuccessfully put up for sale during the second half of 2008. The condos are now being marketed as rental apartments.

During the past few years, the city experienced a major building boom. But now it is like most places in the nation, where banks are reluctant to approve construction loans and the demand for expensive homes and office space has evaporated.

The dearth of development activity and the perception that a recovery is not imminent has meant stalled growth in neighborhoods that were expected to blossom, scores of layoffs in city departments that rely on permit applications, and a precipitous decline in construction jobs.

"There's so much uncertainty that you don't know what fence you're hitting toward," said Tim Tosta, the lawyer representing developers for the Crescent Heights housing project proposed for that empty lot at 10th and Market.

The Crescent Heights developers are pushing forward, trying to find the money necessary to build. Other city developers, from downtown to the Mission District, either can't afford their construction loans or want to wait until they think the market has hit bottom.

Yet not all is doom and gloom. Some developers are applying for building permits and others continue to hire architects, engineers and lawyers. Several large public-private projects, such as the redevelopment of the Hunters Point Shipyard, and small housing developments are still in the works.

Meanwhile, as part of Mayor Gavin Newsom's evolving stimulus plans, the city is trying to devise incentives for developers who want to break ground.

"The number of projects asking for approvals has slowed, but it hasn't dropped off a cliff," said Michael Cohen, head of the city's Office of Workforce and Economic Development. "People are spending money on the planning process with the assumption that once they get through that, things will be in a better place" financially.

For the time being, however, construction in San Francisco is only creeping along.

25% without jobs

About 25 percent of the San Francisco region's approximately 16,000 building trades workers are out of work, compared with nearly full employment last year, said Michael Theriault, secretary and treasurer of the San Francisco Building and Construction Trades Council.

"I've received calls from people in other parts of the country about work here, and I tell them not to come," Theriault said.

The city received 5,600 building permit applications in July. In January, it received just over 4,000. More important, the monetary value of the permits, which often indicates the size and complexity of projects, dropped from about $240 million in July to $78 million in January. As a result, the city's Building Inspection Department laid off 48 employees earlier this month.

The Planning Department also has seen a steep drop in applications for midsize and large projects. The department expects to be $4.1 million in the red at the end of the fiscal year and recently laid off eight employees.

Areas of the city where development was expected to heat up are ice cold.

For example, many projects have been waiting - some for several years - for the city's recent completion of a major rezoning of four neighborhoods on the east side. City officials expected that new construction would flood the area as soon as the planning was done.

So far, only a handful of approximately 70 projects filed with the city's Planning Department have moved forward.

Skyscrapers stalled

The high-rise gap that has long existed between the Bay Bridge and the city's traditional downtown also was expected to start filling up with several new towers by now. But those skyscrapers appear to be stalled.

Mike Kriozere is the developer of the One Rincon project. It includes a 64-story condo tower finished last year. A second, 52-story building is now on hold.

"San Francisco typically has a better real estate market than maybe any other city in the country, but people aren't willing to pay enough for a premier building today," Kriozere said.

Downtown developments to the north also are dormant. Pile driving that had started on an office building at 535 Mission St. stopped a couple of months ago.

Permits extended

The city is trying to do its part by extending some permits that would otherwise soon expire. And city officials also are discussing deferring some development fees until construction starts.

Kelley Amdur, a city planner who overseas downtown projects, said it's a good sign that some developers continue to plan and apply for permits. Planning approvals typically expire in 18 months for office buildings and three years for residential.

"It could mean that developers will want to get moving in 18 months, but the question remains whether the lenders will be ready," Amdur said.
__________________
My other car is a Dakota Creek Advanced Multihull Design.

Tiburon Miami 1 Miami 2 Ye Olde San Francisco SF: Canyons, waterfront... SF: South FiDi SF: South Park
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:50 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.