HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & City of Ottawa


    Attika in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Ottawa Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2012, 12:29 AM
Davis137's Avatar
Davis137 Davis137 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,290
I think that if the shorter building and podium are fronting Parkdale, and the tower is set behind it, that's not quite as bad. If they want to be a little more realistic, they could go with 10 floors less, as it will put it under that magic 27 storey threshold the city seems to love so much and wouldn't look so bad with the Coats building visable behind that one as well, when viewed from a distance.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2012, 1:46 AM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davis137 View Post
and wouldn't look so bad with the Coats building visable behind that one as well, when viewed from a distance.
always the best frame of reference for urban planning decisions, that.

"I'll be using the neighbourhood plans as toilet paper whilst I contemplate the view of this site from across town: ah, just right!"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2012, 2:22 AM
S-Man S-Man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,639
I am shocked - SHOCKED - that this project has gone back to the drawing board!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2012, 3:24 AM
citizen j's Avatar
citizen j citizen j is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by McC View Post
always the best frame of reference for urban planning decisions, that.

"I'll be using the neighbourhood plans as toilet paper whilst I contemplate the view of this site from across town: ah, just right!"
Thanks for that (I snorted).
__________________
The world is so full of a number of things
-- Robert Louis Stevenson
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2012, 2:53 PM
Davis137's Avatar
Davis137 Davis137 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,290
I wasn't trying to trample all over planning process...just the new proposal looks better then the orignal, less intrusive to the Parkdale streetscape.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2012, 10:19 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
HCA update:

http://hintonburg.com/devwatch.html
  • A proposal for a 36 storey condo tower was previously submitted by Tega developments. This proposal was strongly opposed by the HCA and has been withdrawn.
  • Tega met in a preconsultation with the HCA on May 1, 2012 to present a revised rough concept plan with an 18 storey tower on the Hamilton frontage, and an 8 storey tower on the Parkdale side. The whole block except for the Carleton Tavern is included in this plan.
  • The HCA, on a preliminary basis, has indicated that it considers that there is no architectural excellence or other justification for an 18-storey tower. The HCA has also expressed strong concerns about the visual impact of the building from Parkdale. The number of proposed parking spots was also discussed.
  • The developer may take this feedback into consideration as it develops a proposal for consideration by the City and community.
  • Public meetings will be held when detailed plans are available.
  • On June 10, the HCA provided its comments to the developer based on the preliminary plans presented for pre-consultation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2012, 12:45 AM
Marcus CLS Marcus CLS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 338
No compromise by CA

Unbelievable,

The project is cut by 50% in density and it is still not good enough. I agree that 36 stories was probably a stretch but this proposal is far more reasonable for a Brown field site that will require $$ for clean up.

In the city core, 18 stories is a fair proposal. They should have proposed 20.

I am pro intensification and anti pave over farm fields for suburbs.

If this eventually ends up at the OMB the Hintinburg CA will lose.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2012, 1:34 AM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
If someone wants permission to build an exceptional building, why shouldn't they have to design an exceptional building?

PS don't forget that it is Tega that we're talking about here, so they're not getting a pass on reputation alone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2012, 4:49 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
http://app01.ottawa.ca/postingplans/...appId=__8PNOIO

Mixed-use development involving ground floor retail and restaurant, office space and residential & underground garage. Includes 6-storey segment along Parkdale and 18-storey along Hamilton

Planner: Lloyd Phillips & Associates Ltd.
Architect: Alcaide Webster
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2012, 5:29 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 23,956
Certainly not a masterpiece, but it makes more sense than the original proposal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2012, 6:31 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
"it's hideous Jerry, hideous!"

UPDATE
I think I was too harsh, too quick to judge; it's just so ridiculous, from its harvest gold colour to its silly little hat... Actually, I kind of feel sorry for it. I bet all of the other building proposals pick on it on the way to the Planning Department. Poor Attika.

Last edited by McC; Jul 27, 2012 at 6:34 PM. Reason: second thoughts
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2012, 7:31 PM
kevinbottawa kevinbottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by McC View Post
"it's hideous Jerry, hideous!"

UPDATE
I think I was too harsh, too quick to judge; it's just so ridiculous, from its harvest gold colour to its silly little hat... Actually, I kind of feel sorry for it. I bet all of the other building proposals pick on it on the way to the Planning Department. Poor Attika.
I never really looked at the previous proposal too clsely, but 36 storeys would've been ridiculous (and I love height).

When it comes to this proposal, it's not horrible. I like how it would look from Wellington, but from east or west it looks a bit wide. Couldn't they break that up into two thinner towers?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2012, 12:34 AM
m0nkyman m0nkyman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,031
Sorry, but if we're going to have any sanity to our zoning, then brand new and complete CDP's should be respected. This site was specifically slated for eight stories in the CDP that was completed less than two years ago. Get Honeywell to clean up their mess, and build something that respects the CDP.

I can't see them winning at the OMB, so this is a dead letter.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2012, 2:19 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
On the Twitter
Quote:
‏@HintonburgCA

Letters this afternoon from @Katherine_Hobbs office to those writing to oppose Tega: she will vote against! Fantastic news. (cont.)
Quote:
‏@HintonburgCA

(Cont.) Note, tho, that staff still writing its report - still very important to submit comments. Staff opposition is also critical.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2012, 3:44 PM
Davis137's Avatar
Davis137 Davis137 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,290
I don't mind the design asthetic of the building too much. It's still an improvement over the old storeage building that's currently on that block. It will also bring more pedestrian traffic to the neighbourhood, and it's proximity to the park and the market will be really nice for folks that choose to live there. The colour they chose to put on it looks kinda lame, but other than that, the exterior design, including the hat, isn't much unlike condo towers that have gone up in the GTA in the last 10 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2012, 3:45 PM
S-Man S-Man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,639
A neighbourhood like this needs brick or masonry exteriors.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2012, 2:23 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2013, 12:18 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,264
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2013, 12:34 AM
kevinbottawa kevinbottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,229
I like it a lot! Big improvement from the last rendering.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2013, 1:43 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 23,956
Big improvement.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & City of Ottawa
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:42 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.