HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2301  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2018, 9:41 PM
Tykendo Tykendo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 372
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt View Post
Has anyone seen Denver Channel 7 (ABC Affiliate) run their emotional piece, asserting the idea of "Does 650 17th Street belong in Denver?" Pure puff piece intended to capture the audience of all the anti-growthers in Colorado who believe nothing here should ever, ever change - because Colorado is so sacred. No reporting on the actual building, just automatically reporting the building as a potential assault on the very sacred character of Denver. And, of course, it will block the mountains.

Seriously, check out this video and the one that auto-plays immediately after it. The building is "MAMMOTH" and "MASSIVE" (even how they pronounce the words is extremely telling of how biased their reporting is). Absolutely pathetic, Denver Channel 7.

Videos here: https://www.thedenverchannel.com/new...-future-growth
The news piece was way over blown with fear mongering. First off, it isn't going to affect any view. The Front range goes on for almost 200 miles. Move a little to each side and you can see plenty. Stupid argument. Another guy said it was out of scale for the neighborhood. WHATTTTTTT? Get real dude. It's right in the heart of the freakin' financial center of the city. Then there was the argument that all these historic buildings will be lost. Hellloooooooo, it's going on a parking lot. This news report was Smallville USA. This is Denver, Colorado. Growth is coming. Building up isn't the problem, building out is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2302  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2018, 10:06 PM
Tykendo Tykendo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 372
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denver View Post
Tryba should be ashamed to put their name on that building. It looks exactly like the addition to the rescue mission that went up a couple years ago.
The first rendering is awesome. Love how RMPBS would cantilever over the street. Last rendering looked like new architecture in the 60's. Plain and brutal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2303  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2018, 2:18 AM
Matt's Avatar
Matt Matt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New York, NY / Denver, CO
Posts: 2,017


Full Size: https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4765/2...8f28984c_o.jpg

It's amazing how the CPV area has become a skyline in and of itself, with The Confluence clearly being the "signature tower" to anchor everything new being built in the CPV. I was also amazed at the increased density and number of tower cranes.
__________________
This space intentionally left blank
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2304  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2018, 3:38 AM
pablosan pablosan is offline
Up Up and Away
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 2,718
An amazing transformation. In my mind that is one of the best vanatage points in the whole city.
__________________
DenZone
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2305  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2018, 4:09 AM
Matt's Avatar
Matt Matt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New York, NY / Denver, CO
Posts: 2,017
Thanks!

I actually took a panorama with much closer resolution that has a larger extent, since that one photo didn't showcase all the new development. The full size is 80MB and 30,000 pixels wide, so let it load in your browser before scrolling across. I highly recommend checking out the full size pano.

Preview:



FULL SIZE (80MB, BUT TOTALLY WORTH IT!): https://www.flickr.com/photos/767519...43190/sizes/o/

__________________
This space intentionally left blank
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2306  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2018, 4:41 PM
BG918's Avatar
BG918 BG918 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,551
New tower crane going up in Jeff. Park near W 23rd & I-25. Saw it driving today. This is the project:





http://milehighcre.com/two-new-apartment-towers/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2307  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2018, 5:07 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,894
And just like that, developers are already taking advantage of the very very recent zoning changes that were approved for the RiNo area:

https://businessden.com/2018/02/26/m...treet-project/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2308  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2018, 5:18 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,894
And more fun on the Elitch's Side:

https://www.denverite.com/elitch-gardens-48836/

That article gives a cool background on how Elitch's got be where it is now. More importantly though, there's a link to a Denver plan ammendment site, which contains a link to the PDF - https://www.denvergov.org/content/da...view_draft.pdf

And a public survey link - https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/H3S9JXB
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2309  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2018, 5:31 PM
CherryCreek's Avatar
CherryCreek CherryCreek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by twister244 View Post
And more fun on the Elitch's Side:

https://www.denverite.com/elitch-gardens-48836/

That article gives a cool background on how Elitch's got be where it is now. More importantly though, there's a link to a Denver plan ammendment site, which contains a link to the PDF - https://www.denvergov.org/content/da...view_draft.pdf

And a public survey link - https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/H3S9JXB
The whole future of Elitch's is such an interesting question as, ultimately, it looks to be the area of future dense growth in the city. Part of that would be considering whether both the amusement park and arena have a future in the area.

From my own viewpoint, keeping Elitch's downtown is not a priority but a downtown arena makes more sense. All of that (baring Amazon) is probably a decade away I would think.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2310  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2018, 5:48 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,894
There are two distinct things I took away from that PDF:

1.) The city WANTS high density in that area, which would entail rezoning to allow taller buildings. That's a win for sure.

2.) In all of the images/maps showing future roads/trails/etc, Elitch's appears to not be a part of the future of that area. In many of the maps, new roads go right through where Elitch's is today.

I haven't had time to read through the document in detail, but if the city is planning a future without Elitch's in the picture, that's a direct contradiction to the owners of the park who insist they aren't going anywhere.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2311  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2018, 6:13 PM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by CherryCreek View Post
The whole future of Elitch's is such an interesting question as, ultimately, it looks to be the area of future dense growth in the city. Part of that would be considering whether both the amusement park and arena have a future in the area.

From my own viewpoint, keeping Elitch's downtown is not a priority but a downtown arena makes more sense. All of that (baring Amazon) is probably a decade away I would think.
Nothing has changed in my mind other than looking at developing the 17 acres of parking attached to Elitch Gardens. Beyond that I'm assuming the park will be around for decades. I'm projecting that if Revesco Properties ever wants to cash out, the Kroenke Family Trust will step in and preserve Elitch Gardens for families to forever enjoy.

I also assume Kroenke has no interest in selling the Pepsi Center/site which I believe is on a ground lease for maybe six more years. I also expect the Pepsi Center to be around for many decades. What development Kroenke might consider is anybody's guess.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2312  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2018, 8:20 PM
CherryCreek's Avatar
CherryCreek CherryCreek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive View Post
I also expect the Pepsi Center to be around for many decades. What development Kroenke might consider is anybody's guess.

Hardly any sports facilities last for "decades" (if you mean more than two of them) any more. Two baseball stadiums newer then Coors Field have already been replaced. The prior arena, McNichols, lasted only 24 years. Pepsi Center opened in 2000, so will be 18 years old this year.

At the time of the Elitch's acquisition, the CEO of Revesco, Rhys Duggan said:

“We love the park. It’s a great business that just happens to be located on an important piece of land for the city,” said Duggan, who owns the Shoppes at Castle Rock and LoHi’s Old Major restaurant building. “There is no redevelopment plan. It’s a great opportunity to buy an operating business. We will look at it over time, as we do with all of our assets. But right now, it’s business as usual for the park.”

https://www.denverpost.com/2015/06/0...ed-by-kroenke/


When he says it's an amusement park that "just happens to be located on an important piece of land" I don't think he means it's an important piece of land because Elitch's is on it. I'd read it as it's "an important piece of land" because down the road, it has a different use than what it's currently being used for.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2313  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2018, 9:01 PM
DenvertoLA DenvertoLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 364
complete opinion:

I don't get the value of having a park that is so limited in size that it can't build any decent sized rollercoasters. Yeah there is a novelty to it, but the city could save that by putting the marry-go-round or some other ride in a park with a historic sign.

Denver needs a good sized theme park out in the plains where huge rides can be built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2314  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2018, 9:18 PM
Robert.hampton Robert.hampton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 490
'Denver mega-skyscraper project has no land, says owner of downtown property that had been under contract'

https://www.denverpost.com/2018/02/2...enver-no-land/


Ouch, what a total disaster Greenwich Realty Capital has turned out to be.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2315  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2018, 9:29 PM
wong21fr's Avatar
wong21fr wong21fr is offline
Reluctant Hobbesian
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert.hampton View Post
'Denver mega-skyscraper project has no land, says owner of downtown property that had been under contract'

https://www.denverpost.com/2018/02/2...enver-no-land/


Ouch, what a total disaster Greenwich Realty Capital has turned out to be.
How come this article doesn't even load?
__________________
"You don't strike, you just go to work everyday and do your job real half-ass. That's the American way!" -Homer Simpson

All of us who are concerned for peace and triumph of reason and justice must be keenly aware how small an influence reason and honest good will exert upon events in the political field. ~Albert Einstein

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2316  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2018, 9:47 PM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by CherryCreek View Post
Hardly any sports facilities last for "decades" (if you mean more than two of them) any more. Two baseball stadiums newer then Coors Field have already been replaced. The prior arena, McNichols, lasted only 24 years. Pepsi Center opened in 2000, so will be 18 years old this year.

When he says it's an amusement park that "just happens to be located on an important piece of land" I don't think he means it's an important piece of land because Elitch's is on it. I'd read it as it's "an important piece of land" because down the road, it has a different use than what it's currently being used for.
I recall the sale of Elitch Gardens. I'll meet you part way. I'll assume the potential redevelopment on just the 17 acre parking area will take 15 years... not likely to even break ground for at least 6 years. We can revisit the heart of the park at that time.

NBA makes its money on tee vee and merchandise, not so much on home game attendance; not sure about the Avalanche. There's no reason to replace the Pepsi Center so long as it's not falling down. That said, the current site holds enough land to build a replacement should that be the preferred course which means Kroenke will hold onto the parking lots for that purpose. They could easily build a new arena on the Camry Lot. Btw, like several other teams, KSE is looking at developing a new state-of-the-art workout/rehab facility to serve all of the local sports franchises but I suspect the new Rams stadium development is capitalizing most of his time.

I don't recall Kroenke ever selling one of his sports franchises. Josh is currently in Highbury, London, for three months to get close and personal with the Arsenal soccer team. He currently runs the sports end (as opposed to business end) of everything in Colorado. Why would they even consider selling their site?

Coors Field will still be around when your great grandchildren are cheering for the Rockies.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2317  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2018, 11:26 PM
CherryCreek's Avatar
CherryCreek CherryCreek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive View Post

Coors Field will still be around when your great grandchildren are cheering for the Rockies.
We got lucky with Coors Field, it was an exceptional build. With the new lease and investment, in indeed looks like a place that very well may still be in use for another 30 years or longer.

Poor Dallas and Atlanta, ended up paying for two stadiums each.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2318  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2018, 11:29 PM
CherryCreek's Avatar
CherryCreek CherryCreek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert.hampton View Post
'Denver mega-skyscraper project has no land, says owner of downtown property that had been under contract'

https://www.denverpost.com/2018/02/2...enver-no-land/


Ouch, what a total disaster Greenwich Realty Capital has turned out to be.
New concept drawings just released:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2319  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2018, 1:45 AM
SirLucasTheGreat SirLucasTheGreat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 782
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert.hampton View Post
'Denver mega-skyscraper project has no land, says owner of downtown property that had been under contract'

https://www.denverpost.com/2018/02/2...enver-no-land/


Ouch, what a total disaster Greenwich Realty Capital has turned out to be.
Hopefully something happens with El Jebel, Two Tabor, or Amazon now that 650 looks dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2320  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2018, 2:04 AM
HighRanch HighRanch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 11
As they say, "All hat and no cattle"
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:07 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.