HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 1:00 AM
Log1988's Avatar
Log1988 Log1988 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Poco
Posts: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spoolmak View Post
Why does it have to be a big deal? Only a Toronto forumer would make a big deal out of it. Its not that other cities feel left out, if that is even possible, its the fact that if someone were to make a thread saying, "Tallest Mountains in Canada outside of the rockies" would people from BC and AB say "HEY! You can't do that! The tallest mountains are in BC and AB so everything else is obsolete." No. This thread was about what are the tallest U/C outside of Toronto. Because it is interesting to see what is being built outside of Toronto, and that the rest of the forumers, Toronto included, can come and take a peek at what Vancouver or Edmonton or Montreal are building. Is that a crime? To exclude Toronto for once?
I hate to nitpick but the tallest mountains in Canada are in the Saint Elias Range (mostly Yukon), not in the Rockies.

Anyway, the justification behind the decision to exclude the GTA and only the GTA is pretty weak. What if people want to see what is being built in Victoria or Ottawa? Should a new top 10 thread be made excluding the GTA, GVRD, Calgary, Edmonton, and Montreal? Tallest building rankings are necessarily exclusive and it will always be the case that some cities are not represented.

Last edited by Log1988; Nov 23, 2011 at 1:12 AM. Reason: I lied...I actually love to nitpick.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 2:13 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
No, you would just create a thread called "Tallest buildings UC in Victoria" or whatever city you want.

This one is about all of Canada outside of Toronto. It's not saying Toronto is bad or doing anything wrong, it's just saying that we'd also like to see other cities represented on the main Canada page.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 10:17 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Anyone feel like helping me out with my overhaul of Skyscraper Diagrams for Canadian suburban cities?

So far I've only gotten to Burnaby and New Westminster in BC, and... though they're not Suburban, also did a few in Winnipeg and one in Yellowknife. Would like to do Surrey, Mississauga, North Vancouver, and Kelowna(not a Suburb).

Any help would be great, I'm not the greatest at the diagrams but I'm alright
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 11:16 AM
Spoolmak Spoolmak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Log1988 View Post
I hate to nitpick but the tallest mountains in Canada are in the Saint Elias Range (mostly Yukon), not in the Rockies.

Anyway, the justification behind the decision to exclude the GTA and only the GTA is pretty weak. What if people want to see what is being built in Victoria or Ottawa? Should a new top 10 thread be made excluding the GTA, GVRD, Calgary, Edmonton, and Montreal? Tallest building rankings are necessarily exclusive and it will always be the case that some cities are not represented.
Thats not nit picking, I clearly needed to be corrected. I need to do more research
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 2:33 PM
rbt rbt is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Symz View Post
B.C's tallest mountain
Ontario's tallest mountain.


hehe
Pffft. Respect your elder mountains. They've seen way more action than you young upstarts on the west.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 6:33 PM
Deepstar's Avatar
Deepstar Deepstar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,291
Honestly, I don't see much point in this thread. If we have a thread like this to make sure Montreal, Calgary and Vancouver make it onto a list, we might as well have another thread for smaller cities like Halifax, Regina, Winnipeg, etc..

Canada's ten tallest U/C outside of the GTA, with the exception of Vancouver, Montreal or Calgary.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 7:05 PM
The_Architect's Avatar
The_Architect The_Architect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 3,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deepstar View Post
Honestly, I don't see much point in this thread. If we have a thread like this to make sure Montreal, Calgary and Vancouver make it onto a list, we might as well have another thread for smaller cities like Halifax, Regina, Winnipeg, etc..

Canada's ten tallest U/C outside of the GTA, with the exception of Vancouver, Montreal or Calgary.
Take Winnipeg, Edmonton and Quebec out of there too. They're building structures.
__________________
Hope is the quintessential human delusion, simultaneously the source of our greatest strength, and our greatest weakness.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 7:23 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Edmonton and Quebec city are part of this thread. Wow, grasping at straws eh?

Winnipeg is considering a new city's tallest which, if constructed will definitely be on the list(as it would be over 128 meters). Skye Halifax and Kings Wharf both have the potential to be included in the list once UC, and unfortunately Saskatchewan doesn't seem to have any prospects over 95 meters right now, but depending on what is UC nationwide by the time parcel Y comes UC, it does have a chance of being included.


All of this manufactured hating on this list is futile. Some people like it. You obviously don't, so don't use it. Why would we stop using it just because you don't like it? Who the hell are you?
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 7:45 PM
Symz's Avatar
Symz Symz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Windsor, On.
Posts: 1,862
my bad, dyslexia?

Last edited by Symz; Nov 23, 2011 at 8:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 7:52 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
That's what he was saying haha!

If my memory serves right... they are one of the oldest, if not the oldest mountain chain yet detected on Earth. I know the oldest rocks ever found are from the Laurentians. Like 3.7 billion years I think! Craziness.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 9:06 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is online now
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,875
Quebec's tallest (mt. Iberville) aka Mt. Caubvick (Newfoundland & Labrador's tallest; right on border). A badass mountain.


papabear_torngats
[/IMG]
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 9:39 PM
Symz's Avatar
Symz Symz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Windsor, On.
Posts: 1,862
I had no idea! Looks rugged.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 9:53 PM
bolognium's Avatar
bolognium bolognium is offline
bro
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: London, ON
Posts: 510
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Architect View Post
Take Winnipeg, Edmonton and Quebec out of there too. They're building structures.
You've got a knack for coming across as a total prick, dawg.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 10:06 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Yeah no doubt eh?
Even though Edmonton and Quebec City are both in the list. Anything the TO forumers can bitch and complain about, they do.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 10:27 PM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is offline
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Winnipeg is considering a new city's tallest which, if constructed will definitely be on the list(as it would be over 128 meters).
What?? More info please.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 10:35 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
It's just a rumour often mentioned on the Winnipeg page, according to sources on there, it appears to be a valid possibility.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2011, 11:40 PM
kw5150's Avatar
kw5150 kw5150 is offline
Here and There
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,807
Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport View Post
Quebec's tallest (mt. Iberville) aka Mt. Caubvick (Newfoundland & Labrador's tallest; right on border). A badass mountain.


papabear_torngats
[/IMG]


To put that into perspective........the mountain in the middle of the picture below is "Tunnel Mountain" in Banff. It is the same height.....as the one shown above. We dont even put mountain gear on to climb it. lol.

__________________
Renfrew, Calgary, Alberta.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2011, 12:09 AM
Robertpuant Robertpuant is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Montréal
Posts: 843
Banf is already 1400 meters above sea level. You can add a little less than that above the mountain in your photo for a better idea of what would look like mt. Iberville.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2011, 1:16 AM
Vaillant Vaillant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Montréal
Posts: 935


Quebec tallest Mont D'Iberville 1652 m
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2011, 1:33 AM
bolognium's Avatar
bolognium bolognium is offline
bro
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: London, ON
Posts: 510
Quote:
Originally Posted by kw5150 View Post
To put that into perspective........the mountain in the middle of the picture below is "Tunnel Mountain" in Banff. It is the same height.....as the one shown above. We dont even put mountain gear on to climb it. lol.
As Robertpuant said, Mt. Iberville/Caubvick is roughly 1000m taller than Tunnel Mountain when you take the height of the surrounding land into account. Tunnel Mountain only rises 300m above the town in that picture.

So that comparison doesn't really put it into perspective at all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:19 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.