Canada's 25 Tallest Proposals outside of the GTA - Page 3

Chadillaccc · #41 Posted **Nov 23, 2011, 7:54 PM**

The shortest building on the primary list is 118 meters.

You are thinking of the honourable mentions list.

Symz · #42 Posted **Nov 23, 2011, 9:40 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chadillaccc

The shortest building on the primary list is 118 meters.

You are thinking of the honourable mentions list.

Yes, once again, my bad! You knew where I was going with it though. So it gets no honurable mention because you think it's ugly? (Ya, it doesn't look like much, but I sense the London pride in him! Probably took the wind out of his sails)

Vive London?

Travis007 · #43 Posted **Nov 23, 2011, 10:34 PM**

Here's a nice residential project in Calgary. Check the opening video on the website for a better look at the tower. The views of the skyline are going to be spectacular:

The Guardian, 42 storeys

http://www.theguardiancalgary.com/

Chadillaccc · #44 Posted **Nov 23, 2011, 10:36 PM**

that looks like a sweet building! Any idea how tall?

Travis007 · #45 Posted **Nov 23, 2011, 10:42 PM**

I browsed through the Calgary Construction thread and it was listed at 140 m.

Rico Rommheim · #46 Posted **Nov 23, 2011, 10:50 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vaillant

this tower was approved yesterday there will be a new render soon!

Great!

lake of the nations · #47 Posted **Nov 23, 2011, 11:33 PM**

Potential additions to primary list/unknown height

La Porte de Québec, Québec City

http://www.mtlurb.com/forums/showthr...ec-les-projets

Chadillaccc · #48 Posted **Nov 24, 2011, 2:00 AM**

Yeah that is a really interesting proposal! I'll add it to the list of potentials.

feepa · #49 Posted **Nov 25, 2011, 12:24 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chadillaccc

1. Herald Square (Calgary): 221m/ 724ft
2. Bell Centre Residential 1 (Montreal): 197m/ 647ft
3. Kings on Fourth (Calgary): 190m/ 623ft
4. 1133 West Georgia (Vancouver): 188m/ 616ft
5. City Centre I (Calgary): 170m/ 558ft
6. Eighth Avenue Place II (Calgary): 167m/ 547ft
7. Burrard Gateway Tower 1 (Vancouver): 165m/ 541ft
8. City Centre Hotel (Calgary): 162m/ 531ft
9. Manulife Tower 2 (Edmonton): 161m/ 528ft
10. Urbia (Edmonton): 153m/ 502ft
11. 1021 West Hastings (Vancouver): 143m/ 470ft
12. 13778 100 Avenue (Surrey): 137m/ 449ft
13. Telus Residential (Vancouver): 135m/ 443ft
14. 801 West Pender (Vancouver): 134m/ 440ft
15. Bell Centre Office (Montreal): 133m/ 436ft
16. Surrey Civic Centre (Surrey): 130m/ 426ft
17. Place de la Cité Internationale II (Montreal): 128m/ 420ft
18. Waldorf-Astoria Hotel & Residences (Montreal): 127m/ 417ft
19. 4394 Beresford (Burnaby): 127m/ 417ft
20. Vogue (Calgary): 125m/ 411ft
21. Altoria (Montreal): 122m/ 400ft
22. Palliser Square I (Calgary): 118m/ 387ft
23. Palliser Square II (Calgary): 118m/ 387ft
24. Tour Union (Montreal): 118m/ 387ft
25. Complexe SIDEV (Montreal): 118m/ 387ft

-site preparation-

---Renders---

1. Herald Square (Calgary): 221m/ 724ft

centre of image, rendered by CtrlAltDel on SSP.

2. Bell Centre Residential 1 (Montreal): 197m/ 647ft

3. Kings on Fourth (Calgary): 190m/ 623ft

4. 1133 West Georgia (Vancouver): 188m/ 616ft

5. City Centre I (Calgary): 170m/ 558ft

on the left

6. Eighth Avenue Place II (Calgary): 167m/ 547ft

on the left

7. Burrard Gateway Tower 1 (Vancouver): 165m/ 541ft

8. City Centre Hotel (Calgary): 162m/ 531ft

on the right

9. Manulife Tower 2 (Edmonton): 161m/ 528ft

10. Urbia (Edmonton): 153m/ 502ft

the taller in this image

11. 1021 West Hastings (Vancouver): 143m/ 470ft

12. 13778 100 Avenue (Surrey): 137m/ 449ft

tallest tower in this image

13. Telus Residential (Vancouver): 135m/ 443ft

14. 801 West Pender (Vancouver): 134m/ 440ft

15. Bell Centre Office (Montreal): 133m/ 436ft

16. Surrey Civic Centre (Surrey): 130m/ 426ft

17. Place de la Cité Internationale II (Montreal): 128m/ 420ft

18. Waldorf-Astoria Hotel & Residences (Montreal): 127m/ 417ft

19. 4394 Beresford (Burnaby): 127m/ 417ft
no rendering available

20. Vogue (Calgary): 125m/ 411ft

21. Altoria (Montreal): 122m/ 400ft

22 and 23. Palliser Square (Calgary): 2x 118m/ 387ft

24. Tour Union (Montreal): 118m/ 387ft

25. Complexe SIDEV (Montreal): 118m/ 387ft

------------Potential additions to primary list/unknown height-------------

Alberta Boots (Calgary)

Holland Point (Surrey)

Skye (Halifax)

---------------------Honorable mentions--------------------

Attika (Ottawa): 116m/ 381ft

Soho Italia (Ottawa): 115m/ 377ft

Kings Wharf (Halifax): 109m/ 358ft

Marine Gateway (Vancouver): 102m, 78m, 63m/ 335ft, 256ft, 207ft

Convention Centre Expansion (Winnipeg): ---m/ ---ft

Fenwick Tower Redevelopment (Halifax): 100m/ 328ft

Heritage Landing (Winnipeg): 86m/ 282ft

River Landing (Saskatoon): 90m/ 295ft

1855 Rose Street (Regina): 74m/ 243

Where are the photo credits? Do you have rights to distribute or use these pictures? Are you the original photog? Did you miss the forum rules when you signed up, or have you forgot them since you were last warned about this?

osirisboy · #50 Posted **Nov 25, 2011, 12:47 AM**

hey feepa dont be such a dick, if your concern about crediting photos is so important to you you should message him and discuss it. and whats with copying all the images again?

Im sick of coming onto threads to see it filled with bullshit.

Chadillaccc · #51 Posted **Nov 25, 2011, 3:35 AM**

Yeah, I don't get all this bullshit hating on me. Because I start threads that many people have been saying they want, but the big "cool guy" forumers don't like it so I get shit on?

Fuck you, and your credits. I'm sick of this shit.

Why don't you go bitch to Ramako about his threads having a lack of credits? Cause none of the renders on his do either. He only credits the photos of the construction sites which are taken by members on SSP. He has years of experience on me on this forum and doesn't follow the rules. I don't even know how to find the original creators of these renders, why should I be penalized just because I haven't been on SSP for 6 years?

Give me a break you fucking internet bully's. This is god damn horse shit.

craner · #52 Posted **Nov 25, 2011, 5:28 AM**

I really like the Halifax proposals (Skye & Kings Wharf) - would be great to see those become reality for H-Town.

Rico Rommheim · #53 Posted **Nov 25, 2011, 5:55 AM**

Wow, Winnipeg is on a roll. All that;s missing now is a good 150m tower! C'mon Winnie, do it! Do it for ol' Rico.

logan5 · #54 Posted **Nov 25, 2011, 5:55 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by feepa

Where are the photo credits? Do you have rights to distribute or use these pictures? Are you the original photog? Did you miss the forum rules when you signed up, or have you forgot them since you were last warned about this?

It's promotional material distributed by the developer, so it seems like it's in a different category that maybe doesn't need accreditation. Just my opinion though.

craner · #55 Posted **Nov 25, 2011, 6:13 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rico Rommheim

Wow, Winnipeg is on a roll. All that;s missing now is a good 150m tower! C'mon Winnie, do it! Do it for ol' Rico.

Agreed - would be great to see a mini boom in the Peg with a couple of skyline changers built.
Come on Winni - we're all pulling for you.

artvandelay · #56 Posted **Nov 25, 2011, 7:39 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by feepa

Where are the photo credits? Do you have rights to distribute or use these pictures? Are you the original photog? Did you miss the forum rules when you signed up, or have you forgot them since you were last warned about this?

Thanks for quoting the entire post. I can see that it was really necessary to post all 35 images again to get your point across.

isaidso · #57 Posted **Nov 25, 2011, 10:26 AM**

Like the King's Wharf proposal for Halifax the best. Nice to see cities like Halifax and Edmonton with significant development proposals.

The_Architect · #58 Posted **Nov 25, 2011, 5:18 PM**

Quote:

Third-party articles and images must be properly formatted and credited

Please familiarize yourself with these rules. Once you have you can prevent this section from displaying again by clicking here to collapse this section.

Images
When posting images in the forum which are not your own you are required to provide credit to the originating website of each image.

To properly credit an image please include, above or below the image, the name of the photographer or creator of the image, plus the URL to the webpage the image originates from.

Please note that simply posting the URL of the image as text (along with displaying the image) is not adequate. Additionally, posting just the domain name portion of a URL is not adequate either. The URL must link to a page within the originating website which actually displays the image.

When posting multiple images originating from the same source it is acceptable to give credit just once at the top of the list of images.

Internet memes don't need to be credited.

Feepa is right, though he didn't need to quote the entire thing.

Chadillaccc · #59 Posted **Nov 25, 2011, 7:22 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chadillaccc

Yeah, I don't get all this bullshit hating on me. Because I start threads that many people have been saying they want, but the big "cool guy" forumers don't like it so I get shit on?

Fuck you, and your credits. I'm sick of this shit.

Why don't you go bitch to Ramako about his threads having a lack of credits? Cause none of the renders on his do either. He only credits the photos of the construction sites which are taken by members on SSP. He has years of experience on me on this forum and doesn't follow the rules. I don't even know how to find the original creators of these renders, why should I be penalized just because I haven't been on SSP for 6 years?

Give me a break you fucking internet bully's. This is god damn horse shit.

I'm right, and I'm not changing anything. Grow up a$$ holes.

feepa · #60 Posted **Nov 25, 2011, 7:38 PM**

obviously the mods have stopped caring about photo credits. I guess its free game to post what ever picture you want on this forum