HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2013, 1:07 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is online now
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,533
A retractable canopy could work. I'm not sure what the price would be for that, but for those four month, Metro Vancouverites want as much unfiltered sun as humanly possible, so a permanent canopy over the square wouldn't fly, I don't think.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2013, 2:54 AM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by giallo View Post
A retractable canopy could work. I'm not sure what the price would be for that, but for those four month, Metro Vancouverites want as much unfiltered sun as humanly possible, so a permanent canopy over the square wouldn't fly, I don't think.
Retractable canvas/Teflon (same material a BC Place) could work and wouldn't be so difficult/expensive to build and maintain
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2013, 3:48 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
Would have been awesome to see some sort of canopy over it similar to the Sony Center in Berlin so that it could be used year round with cafes and maybe even bars.
Sony Center was my favorite place in Berlin. Fabulous square full of life 24/7. It would be great to have something like it in Downtown Vancouver (in the Entertainment District), but I doubt it would ever happen in Brentwood.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2013, 5:17 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,143
its just not part of the lifestyle here
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2013, 6:10 AM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 2,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Thanks for the pics!

Agreed that disjointed designs are "in" - UBC's SUB plaza comes to mind.
Looks like a logical corridor leading to the existing mall.

I hope the opening under that escalator doesn't read "underground parkade" like at the Canadian Tire on SW Marine Drive.
There will be parking and retail underground.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2013, 7:52 AM
Laniatus Laniatus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 97
Several of the pictures describing their "suspended art" ideas had covers over the parts of the plaza. One of the pictures even had several hundred umbrellas and another had some kind of canvas material suspended over the outdoor areas. You can see a picture of it on the poster titled "public art" in my album I linked.

They could do something very cool but I'm afraid to get my hopes up...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2013, 9:48 AM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 2,816
Another rendering..

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2013, 2:05 PM
Canadian Mind's Avatar
Canadian Mind Canadian Mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,921
Looks like someone's "Brentwood 50 year plan" from 1964...
__________________
"you're eating chicken periods" - Vid
"I love eggs, especially the ones with runny yolks" - Me
"EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, you're disgusting!" - Vid
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2013, 3:44 PM
WBC WBC is offline
Transit User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Metrotown/Downtown
Posts: 786
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Mind View Post
Looks like someone's "Brentwood 50 year plan" from 1964...
It needs some flying cars...

I have my doubts that the final design will look anything like that. Especially those stacked glass cubes...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2013, 4:46 PM
Millennium2002 Millennium2002 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,742
It's funny how most things in Vancouver are not designed to be weather-proof despite the conditions that already exist...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2013, 6:16 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by allan_kuan View Post
It's funny how most things in Vancouver are not designed to be weather-proof despite the conditions that already exist...
Weather-proof stuff seems mostly popular in cities with REAL winters, like Montreal and Toronto. (... but I wonder how we compare to Seattle on that point.... )
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2013, 7:51 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,143
seattle is about the same as us as far as weather proofing goes

the seattle outlet mall is open air and miserable on rainy days
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2013, 8:01 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 21,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
seattle is about the same as us as far as weather proofing goes

the seattle outlet mall is open air and miserable on rainy days
They love to build open air outlet malls across the US... in places like Boston where it's sweltering in the summer and freezing in the winter.

DERP.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2013, 9:31 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
its just not part of the lifestyle here
And lifestyles don't change? Architecture can't influence lifestyle?

I bet you if they were able to build a covered plaza that could be used 300+ days of the year, it would be heavily used. Especially when you have 6-10 residential and office towers and a huge mall connected to it giving it life 18 hours a day.

Who wouldn't like a nice plaza where you can have a coffee or a beer in a large open space year round with heaters in the winter, a roof for the rain, and shade in the summer?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2013, 3:19 AM
WBC WBC is offline
Transit User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Metrotown/Downtown
Posts: 786
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
And lifestyles don't change? Architecture can't influence lifestyle?

I bet you if they were able to build a covered plaza that could be used 300+ days of the year, it would be heavily used. Especially when you have 6-10 residential and office towers and a huge mall connected to it giving it life 18 hours a day.

Who wouldn't like a nice plaza where you can have a coffee or a beer in a large open space year round with heaters in the winter, a roof for the rain, and shade in the summer?
Completely agree. Our architecture and building design looks more suited to California than North West. And it is not just the lack of rain protection (which is sometimes comical - why design a brand new building that has gaps in awnings for no identifiable reason). It is also incredibly bad building insulation (for example, obsession with all glass towers - is it because it is cheaper to build?), poor road/highway and street drainage, poor signage and road markings that are nearly impossible to see in the rain and fog and the list goes on.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2013, 11:06 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,143
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
And lifestyles don't change? Architecture can't influence lifestyle?

I bet you if they were able to build a covered plaza that could be used 300+ days of the year, it would be heavily used. Especially when you have 6-10 residential and office towers and a huge mall connected to it giving it life 18 hours a day.

Who wouldn't like a nice plaza where you can have a coffee or a beer in a large open space year round with heaters in the winter, a roof for the rain, and shade in the summer?
i know myself and my family and friends would prefer to head to the walking trails or beaches than hang out at a mall

judging by the hundreds of people who would rather hang out in the evening at english bay beach than any number of outdoor spaces downtown i think helps prove people in this city just don't feel the attraction of plazas

winter is different obviously, i think we get so few great days when we do outdoors is more popular

the convention centre is alright but i would guess its 90% tourists hanging out down there

i don't know

brentwood and any number of places is okay if you have to be there but no one really would choose to be there from what i have heard/observed

i think with this town its like lets go do the grind not lets go do the plaza, i am not a grind person however
__________________
belowitall

Last edited by SpongeG; Jun 29, 2013 at 11:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2013, 12:00 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,844
@SpongeG

I largely agree with, but I think lifestyles can learn to change.
On a purely physical level, design tweaks to consolidate and extend the canopies here and there would draw in more people to cafés, to shop, even to hang out (esp in winter) ...


An an example, Seattle seems to be a city with a large public presentation of music. (or am I wrong) If they could bring something like that to the malls, it might work as an attraction.

And don't say it can't be done here.
I remember years back at the main HSBC building in BC where a chamber quartet played, as people drank their coffee and tea ..... something seemed "right" about that
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2013, 3:42 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,347
So this has been approved by the city. First phase will include two 60 story towers!

http://www.burnabynow.com/news/brent...roval-1.639284
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2013, 4:14 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,187
Amazing news.

"...first phase of development will include a public plaza and two 60-storey towers..."

"...including 10 residential buildings, two office towers ranging from 30 to 40 storeys..."

Sweet
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2013, 4:32 AM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
^^ Amazing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:03 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.