HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction


1000M in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1021  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 8:03 AM
AMWChicago's Avatar
AMWChicago AMWChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fvn View Post
*waits for Related to buy it*
^^^
111 W Wacker inbound...
__________________
Please Skyscraper Gods, let Tribune East happen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1022  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 1:40 PM
Kumdogmillionaire's Avatar
Kumdogmillionaire Kumdogmillionaire is offline
Development Shill
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,136
Slight correction, 37 units sold, not 34. Still pretty bad
__________________
For you - Bane
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1023  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 6:49 PM
AMWChicago's Avatar
AMWChicago AMWChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 202
So is this event they're having going to redesign the interior spaces to be more cost effect/efficient, or could we anticipate a height reduction or design change? What is at play here? And how will this affect the timeline. I remember this time last year they wanted to break ground Q1 2019, if all goes well (which is a big IF) would we expect a possible ground breaking in 2020, and at that point will the market be too cool for this to even launch...

Basically what I'm feeling now is that its window for breaking ground is 2019. If it doesn't get off ground this year we're gonna be looking at lot till at least 2025.
__________________
Please Skyscraper Gods, let Tribune East happen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1024  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 7:07 PM
PittsburghPA PittsburghPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: West Loop Gate, Chicago
Posts: 933
With the amount of residential projects in the South Loop that have come to fruition since this projects inception what are the chances this lot pivots to office tower? Whether it be this developer or another?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1025  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 7:36 PM
Fvn Fvn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by PittsburghPA View Post
With the amount of residential projects in the South Loop that have come to fruition since this projects inception what are the chances this lot pivots to office tower? Whether it be this developer or another?
The question relating to an office tower is if the lot is big enough. Because keep in mind decent sized office towers need quite a bit more space than residential towers (due to all the elevators needed the cores get big).

Idk how large the actual property of 1000 Michigan Ave is but looking at renderings the footprint looks to only go to about the back of 1006 Michigan Ave and that definitely would be too small for an office tower. But the neighboring lots could obviously probably be acquired if a developer really wanted to put an office tower there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1026  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 8:15 PM
The Lurker The Lurker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Great Lakes
Posts: 708
Is there really a market for a major office tower in this location?
__________________
Lets go Brandon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1027  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 8:18 PM
gebs's Avatar
gebs gebs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: South Loop
Posts: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lurker View Post
Is there really a market for a major office tower in this location?
Although I've lived in the south loop for 7 years, I can't speak to its demand or potential for an office tower. That said, 1000M's footprint and adjacent parking lot would make it a good candidate for a decently tall office tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1028  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 8:30 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,127
This lot is too far from major transit hubs for office. And smart companies don't pay for amazing views for workers who aren't supposed to be looking out the windows.

There are still tons of parking lots in better spots than this that would be developed first.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1029  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 8:40 PM
HomrQT's Avatar
HomrQT HomrQT is offline
All-American City Boy
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hinsdale / Uptown, Chicago
Posts: 1,939
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaron38 View Post
This lot is too far from major transit hubs for office. And smart companies don't pay for amazing views for workers who aren't supposed to be looking out the windows.

There are still tons of parking lots in better spots than this that would be developed first.
The Roosevelt CTA stop is a block and a half away, there are tons of buses on Michigan have and near, and there's several Metra stops not too far away. I don't think transportation is an issue for this site.
__________________
1. 9 DeKalb Ave - Brooklyn, NYC - SHoP Architects - Photo
2. American Radiator Building - New York City - Hood, Godley, and Fouilhoux - Photo
3. One Chicago Square - Chicago - HPA and Goettsch Partners - Photo
4. Chicago Board of Trade - Chicago - Holabird & Root - Photo
5. Cathedral of Learning - Pittsburgh - Charles Klauder - Photo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1030  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 9:42 PM
gebs's Avatar
gebs gebs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: South Loop
Posts: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomrQT View Post
The Roosevelt CTA stop is a block and a half away, there are tons of buses on Michigan have and near, and there's several Metra stops not too far away. I don't think transportation is an issue for this site.
I agree. It's close to Red/Green/Orange lines, and not too far from Brown/Pink/Purple, plus all the Michigan Avenue bus routes and the Metra stops in Grant Park.

I do agree that it's not the most attractive location for an office, but in a few cycles, once there are no more lots available in the CBD, who knows?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1031  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 9:53 PM
PittsburghPA PittsburghPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: West Loop Gate, Chicago
Posts: 933
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaron38 View Post
This lot is too far from major transit hubs for office. And smart companies don't pay for amazing views for workers who aren't supposed to be looking out the windows.

There are still tons of parking lots in better spots than this that would be developed first.
As far as the views, what about every office tower in the Loop and LSE looking towards the park and the lake? Also your idea of "smart companies" sound like the Chinese firms that need suicide nets outside of their windows haha.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1032  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2019, 12:43 AM
AlpacaObsessor AlpacaObsessor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Lincoln Park, Chicago
Posts: 120
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaron38 View Post
This lot is too far from major transit hubs for office. And smart companies don't pay for amazing views for workers who aren't supposed to be looking out the windows.

There are still tons of parking lots in better spots than this that would be developed first.
I agree with you in regards to the transit. Sure it's definitely not a transit desert, but it's still inconvenient for metra commuters to have to tack on an extra 15 minute shuttle ride to an already 45 minute+ commute. If you look at pretty much every new office tower that's been constructed over the past few years they've all been in the West Loop close to Union and Ogilvie stations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1033  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2019, 6:36 PM
SteelMonkey SteelMonkey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 344
Per Curbed article today.....

“1000M was the fastest selling project in Chicago in 2018 by far, and the International Collection is already building on that,” added Karlik. “Right now we’re out there looking for financing. We hope to land financing in the next few months and to begin construction shortly thereafter.”

Provided the team keeps to schedule, Karlik expects 1000M to deliver its first units to residents in mid 2021 or roughly 24 to 28 months after breaking ground at 1000 S. Michigan Avenue.

The addition of the International Collection bumps the project’s overall unit count to 421—up from a previous figure of 323. The smaller units will make their official public debut on February 9 at a launch event at 1000M’s sales gallery located at nearby 1006 S. Michigan Avenue


https://chicago.curbed.com/2019/1/31...cro-apartments
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1034  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2019, 6:40 PM
tm30's Avatar
tm30 tm30 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 93
Well that paints a different picture all together.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1035  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2019, 6:40 PM
KWillChicago's Avatar
KWillChicago KWillChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,113
This seems like good news?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1036  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2019, 6:53 PM
Ricochet48 Ricochet48 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: River North, Chicago
Posts: 189
Was just about to post that curbed article, very surprising...

Interested to see the layout of a 325sqft studio (at $313K or w/e) as well as the market...

You can get an 800+sqft place in my RN building for that with solid (but less posh) amenities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1037  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2019, 7:09 PM
Fvn Fvn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 694
lol we'll see through, with this project I'm not gonna believe it until I see a caisson rig on site
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1038  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2019, 7:17 PM
jc5680's Avatar
jc5680 jc5680 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,367
I still don't really understand how a development claiming to be "the fastest selling project in 2018" reconciles that statement with the fact that they changed the layout mix so drastically that it increases the unit count by more than 30%. You don't make a change that big without some sort of catalyst.

Without specific numbers I am still suspicious. What other projects is this comparison being made against? Vista and OBP?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1039  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2019, 7:37 PM
Barrelfish Barrelfish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by jc5680 View Post
I still don't really understand how a development claiming to be "the fastest selling project in 2018" reconciles that statement with the fact that they changed the layout mix so drastically that it increases the unit count by more than 30%. You don't make a change that big without some sort of catalyst.

Without specific numbers I am still suspicious. What other projects is this comparison being made against? Vista and OBP?
I share that skepticism. It's also hard to square "fastest selling project in 2018" with the fact that they don't yet have financing secured.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1040  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2019, 7:47 PM
The Pimp's Avatar
The Pimp The Pimp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago/Hamilton Lake
Posts: 419
Quote:
Originally Posted by KWillChicago View Post
This seems like good news?
No financing in place. Questionable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:00 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.