Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed
Not to dwell on this, but I'm deeply disturbed by the concept, if not this particular implementation.
|
I think we can agree on the fact that the true extent of this sort of technology remains to be seen. The archival aspect is an interesting one, because who's to say that the material (original, un-blurred) couldn't be seized and used in investigations, etc. "Sorry - your alibi doesn't check out because the Google streetview truck shows you walking up to the door".
I am personally not too concerned about the whole thing - at least what Google is doing - I see it is an interesting evolution to mapping and navigation that is in itself pretty amazing. I have a reasonable expectation of privacy in my house and in my bedroom, and I don't feel that this infringes on it. I also think that the likelihood of being snapped by the Google truck as it drives by is a needle in a hay stack type of thing, let along doing something in public that would be illegal, inappropriate, etc.
The cynic in me, however, thinks that we all might be come a little too comfortable with being photographed, filmed, etc. and we, as a society, might become complacent to the whole idea and, as you made a reference to Orwell, could see it come back and bite us in the ass.
And you bet - if a government/regime ever saw a reason, be it Nazis or whoever, they'd have the means to either obtain it themselves, or force the provider to play along. I'm just not convinced that having a picture of my house, even with me visible in the frame, that is anywhere from months to years old, is going to help anyone round me up and throw me in the slammer.
But I'll admit that I'm maybe a bit naive about it at the same time - "who would want anything to do with little old me?"
Interesting stuff - kind of uncharted territory (pun kind of intended).