Quote:
Originally Posted by mello
I'm down with 11th and Broadway, looks great. So I just drove through Denver today, in Colorado Springs now visiting family. First time driving in the metro area and it looks like Denver has a significantly larger amount of high rises outside of their downtown than San Diego. This area is quite flat and obviously not coastal so its real estate is not restricted yet they have more verticality then the SD metro.
Why is it that San Diego is so afraid of height outside of downtown? I just don't get it. Denver is a smaller metro and has more stuff, I think for a metro area of our size our amount of mid and highrises outside of DT is really pathetic, do you guys agree. SD is way too low rise
|
I think we are very much a poli-centric city. This bothers me. UTC, Mission Valley, Sorrento Valley, Downtown, etc. They all compete for willing investors to build projects. Density and height are not similar by the way.... I understand that market factors and personal preferences do spur growth and density outside of downtown, I just think that downtown should be the most advantageous place to develop. There should be more incentives and streamlined procedures to encourage developers to invest their money in downtown and not Mission Valley.
As for height.... I think the height restriction on downtown SD has done the city wonders in terms of aesthetics. It has helped to broaden the cluster of highrises rather evenly - aside from the gaslamp quarter. Many feel the skyline is 'squaty', I like this cause it spreads the density farther than just along the B street corridor. If not, we would have a LA-style Bunker Hill effect along B street.