HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted May 9, 2008, 2:47 AM
hamiltonguy hamiltonguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 316
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpgq View Post
Who politically is pushing for more GO service to James instead of Hunter?

I see way more benefit for more service to Hunter, it is in just a far denser area, both residentially, commercially and institutionally. And closer to the east west LRT line. With more scheduled service to Hunter, I could see condos going up in some of the underutilized areas right near the station (although I admit, being right beside the GO station hasn't seemed to help the Chateau Royal).
The problem lies with eastward expansion. St.Catharines and Grimsby are larger and more connected with Hamilton and Toronto, and would therefore be more logical to serve.

Unfortunately it is not possible to serve anywhere but Welland from Hunter Street.
__________________
My Blog:

http://forwardhamilton.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted May 9, 2008, 9:12 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 19,880
New GO service from Stoney Creek

Ken Mann
5/9/2008

Perhaps some good news for local commuters.

GO Transit is adding daily bus service between Stoney Creek and Burlington.

The service will amount to 16 daily express trips between the Red Hill Plaza at Barton and Nash, to the heavily-used GO station in Burlington.

It's being called a precursor to further services in the Niagara region, as well as a way to ease the parking demands at the Burlington station.

The new bus service will begin late next month.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted May 10, 2008, 2:31 AM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
more info on this, with lots of Hamilton references:


GO’s ridership growing faster than service




Bus service, parking lots stretched
May 09, 2008 03:09 PM
TESS KALINOWSKI
TRANSPORTATION REPORTER
As fast as GO Transit expands its bus and train service, ridership on many routes appears to be growing faster.
This year GO was expecting about a 4- to 5 per cent increase in riders. But March ridership numbers released to GO's board of directors this week showed average weekday ridership increased 7.5 per cent over the same month last year.

That's about 14,080 more riders daily or the equivalent of nine additional train trips.

A surfeit of riders is a good problem to have when "most transit companies are out there screaming to get people on the system," said GO managing director Gary McNeil.

"We're trying to manage the demand based on the supply we've got available," he said, adding that bus capacity is almost "maxed out" even though GO introduced the first of its new double-decker fleet on the Highway 407 routes in April and it is not retiring its coaches as fast as it had expected.

Ridership is migrating to the off-peak periods when there are seats available on the trains, but at many stations there's virtually no parking available by the end of the morning rush, said customer service director Bill Jenkins.

The third track being built along GO's busy Lakeshore line means the Oakville VIA station for about $3 million by December.(The new station will be built northwest of the existing building, which is being demolished.

Georgetown riders will have their weekend bus service to Union Station increased. An hourly express service will service downtown Brampton and a second hourly service will go to Bramalea and Malton.

The transit company also plans to launch a new weekday bus service between Bronte and Milton with 13 trips in each direction to connect with 407 bus service at the Burlington 407 Carpool lot, the Lakeshore West service to Union Station and McMaster University.

As it prepares to extend service into the Niagara Region, GO is also introducing buses from a new interim park n' ride lot in Stoney Creek to the Burlington station. The move is expected to reduce the demand on parking at Burlington, where a new parking structure is supposed to open next month.

All GO Transit’s Milton trains are now pulling 12 cars that accommodate 300 additional passengers on each train.

The 12-car trains also are being used on three Lakeshore runs: the 8:25 a.m. Oshawa express train to Union Station; the 5:03 train to Pickering from Union and the 4:10 p.m. express to Burlington from Union Station.

Eight of GO’s 27 new locomotives are now in service. The agency is awaiting delivery of more locomotives before it can add more 12-car trains to the busy Lakeshore line. The new engines are supposed to be delivered by the middle of next year.

Meantime, some Lakeshore platforms still need to be lengthened to accommodate the longer trains. Platform work begins this month in Hamilton, in the summer at Appleby and in the fall at Long Branch.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted May 10, 2008, 2:58 AM
DHLawrence DHLawrence is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cambridge, Ontario
Posts: 937
Good to see there's growth, even if GO's having trouble catching up.

Will GO and VIA be sharing the new station in Oakville, or are they going to be in separate buildings still?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted May 10, 2008, 2:41 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 19,880
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2010, 11:15 AM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 19,880
Study proposes options other than a super highway

June 25, 2010
Daniel Nolan
The Hamilton Spectator
http://www.thespec.com/News/Local/article/796077

It appears the much-vaunted idea of building a super highway between Fort Erie and Burlington is dead.

The group studying transportation schemes between Niagara and the GTA has outlined preferred options and they do not include the super highway.

However, it does say in its latest report that a new highway corridor between west Niagara and Stoney Creek-Hamilton "in the long term ... will help to alleviate future congestion on QEW and provide (road) network flexibility." It implies this might be beyond 2031.

The options proposed are a new highway corridor connecting the QEW in Fort Erie/Niagara Falls with Highway 406 in Welland; widening of the QEW between Highway 406 in St. Catharines and the Freeman Interchange (QEW-403-407) in Burlington; operational improvements on Highway 403 between the Ancaster-Brant County border and the Freeman Interchange in the short term; and a new corridor study to connect Highway 403 at Ancaster-Brant with Highway 407 near the Burlington-Milton border.

The options were presented at Public Information Centres held over the past week in Ancaster, Burlington and Welland. It was the fourth open house held by the Niagara-GTA study team since the idea of the super highway was put under the scrutiny of an environmental assessment by the Liberal government in 2005.

The team also recommended exploring Hamilton as the centre for an inter-regional transit service involving Niagara, Brantford, Burlington, Guelph and Kitchener- Waterloo. This would hark back to when Hamilton was the centre of numerous streetcar lines in the early part of the 20th century.

The draft transportation development strategy, which considered community, economic, environment and transportation impacts of the preferred options, will be finalized by the end of the year with input from the last information centre. It will then undergo a review by the Ministry of Transportation and other agencies.

Under the former Conservative government, a 2001 study determined the need for a new highway and premier Mike Harris announced plans to build a $1.5-billion highway between the QEW in Fort Erie and Highway 407 in Burlington.

The mid-peninsula corridor was supported by Hamilton, Niagara Region, Hamilton Chamber of Commerce and the Niagara Economic Development Corp. It was opposed by Burlington and Citizens Opposed to Paving the Escarpment because it threatened the Niagara Escarpment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2011, 11:39 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 19,880
Niagara highway idea revived by Tories

Last Updated: Monday, January 10, 2011 | 5:56 PM ET
The Canadian Press

The idea of building a new highway through the Niagara peninsula linking Fort Erie with the Hamilton airport is being revived by Progressive Conservative Leader Tim Hudak, nine months before Ontario voters face a general election.

An alternate route to the Queen Elizabeth Way from Niagara to Hamilton has been talked about for decades. It was last championed by former Conservative premier Mike Harris but fell out of favour again when the Liberals were first elected in 2003.

Plans for a mid-peninsula highway were shelved again last summer by the Liberals after a Ministry of Transportation study said the four-lane expressway wouldn't be needed for at least another 20 years.

Hudak, who represents Niagara West-Glanbrook, said the Liberals made a mistake in putting off the proposed highway, which would take some traffic off the QEW through the Niagara-Hamilton region.

"I just strongly disagree with [Premier] Dalton McGuinty, who says he's going to put off this important project until 2030 and study it again," said Hudak. "I think that's wrong. We'd go forward."

The new highway would not only bring construction jobs, but would help attract more business to Ontario, creating more full-time employment, said Hudak.

"This will be the biggest investment in job creation, not only building the highway but attracting new businesses and jobs to Niagara, Hamilton and the western GTA, in generations," he said.

"We are a trading economy, and if we don't invest in our highway infrastructure, we're not going to attract the jobs we should in our province."

Transportation Minister Kathleen Wynne was unavailable for comment Monday, but the government said it was in the process of completing a transportation study for the Niagara to Toronto corridor, considering all modes of transport.

"We are not just planning to build a highway through sensitive lands," the Ministry of Transportation said in an email.

"The previous government launched into plans for building a mega-highway through some very important communities. That is not what we are doing. We want to get it right."

The New Democrats wondered where Hudak would find the money to build the new highway, which was estimated to be $1.3 billion when last costed out 10 years ago.

"The mid-peninsula corridor has been a mythical thing for years," said New Democrat Peter Kormos, who represents the Niagara-area riding of Welland.

"Nobody knows what the route would be, nobody knows who would be using it and nobody knows who would benefit."

The government's preferred options for transportation changes in the region were broken into three segments last summer, including a call for a new highway between Fort Erie and Highway 406 near Welland.

The study only supports adding two high-occupancy vehicle lanes to the QEW between St. Catharines and Burlington.

And it also calls for a new corridor study to connect Highway 403 to Highway 407 somewhere north of Ancaster and Waterdown before crossing the Niagara escarpment in Halton region.

There's no longer any need for a mid-peninsula highway and even former supporters of the idea have changed their minds, said Kormos.

"Hudak's a day late and a dollar short on this one," he said.

"The mid-peninsula corridor is no longer a flavour of the month in regional Niagara."

The government study group did not examine the idea of putting tolls on any new highways linking Niagara and the Greater Toronto Area, but hasn't ruled out charges for motorists.

"The Ontario government is committed to considering innovative ways to fund new infrastructure projects, including tolling," says the government's Niagara-GTA website page of frequently asked questions.


Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/sto...#ixzz1Ag8qYpT0
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2011, 3:17 PM
miketoronto miketoronto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,978
This is just stupid. We are either going to do transit or highways, and the government better make up their minds.

If they are going to improve transit, than there really is no need for another highway through a world BIOSPHERE reserve.
__________________
Miketoronto
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:44 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.