HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2018, 5:53 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,532
Second Narrows water main tunnel project

Maybe they can dig some Skytrain tunnels while they are down there.

Quote:
Metro Vancouver has begun pre-construction on a $430-million, five-metre wide tunnel under the Second Narrows to supply drinking water to much of the Lower Mainland.






http://www.nsnews.com/news/work-begi...nel-1.23163519
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2018, 8:15 AM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,096
It would be much easier to build a bridge for the Skytrain. This tunnel is going to be quite deep. They have to get below any potential slip surfaces for landslides that are triggered by earthquakes. This should be a 1-in-10,000 year earthquake event design, so it's got quite the high design standard.

I don't think Translink designs it's infrastructure to quite as high a standard, since water mains basically can't be brought offline for lengthy repairs after an earthquake without potentially causing huge societal problems. The skytrain being down, while a giant pain would be less likely to stop large swaths of the city from being inhabitable.

This should be a very similar project to the Port Mann Main Water Supply Tunnel, which a couple of my colleagues managed. The shafts are probably designed to sheer a little bit in the event of a large earthquake, without damaging the pipes in the shafts. It's pretty cool stuff.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2018, 8:34 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Mackinnon View Post
It would be much easier to build a bridge for the Skytrain. This tunnel is going to be quite deep. They have to get below any potential slip surfaces for landslides that are triggered by earthquakes. This should be a 1-in-10,000 year earthquake event design, so it's got quite the high design standard.

I don't think Translink designs it's infrastructure to quite as high a standard, since water mains basically can't be brought offline for lengthy repairs after an earthquake without potentially causing huge societal problems. The skytrain being down, while a giant pain would be less likely to stop large swaths of the city from being inhabitable.

This should be a very similar project to the Port Mann Main Water Supply Tunnel, which a couple of my colleagues managed. The shafts are probably designed to sheer a little bit in the event of a large earthquake, without damaging the pipes in the shafts. It's pretty cool stuff.
Sorry, I was just joking

They said it's pretty much identical to the Port Mann project and they are also replacing pipe in Stanley Park (2020-2024). I guess we know why it's called Pipeline Road too.



http://www.metrovancouver.org/servic...k-water-tunnel
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2018, 4:42 PM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,096
I can talk about that one more in a couple weeks. With some luck I may be designing part of that project.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words

Last edited by Alex Mackinnon; Feb 5, 2018 at 5:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2018, 4:46 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Maybe they can dig some Skytrain tunnels while they are down there.
I wonder why they didn't size all three interior pipes the same size? It seems like a bit of a waste of space. Leaving space for inspection robots, perhaps?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2018, 5:19 PM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
I wonder why they didn't size all three interior pipes the same size? It seems like a bit of a waste of space. Leaving space for inspection robots, perhaps?
Different operating pressures for different local reservoir destinations and feed sources. It lets Metro Vancouver pump less, which saves lots of money.

If only 1 or 2 of the feed lines need to be pressurised above the Capilano or Seymour Reservoir level, then the only have to pump some of the water instead of all of the water.

If I recall correctly, 2 of the lines come from Seymour and 1 line comes from the Capilano Reservoir which is at a lower elevation.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2018, 8:26 PM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Sorry, I was just joking

They said it's pretty much identical to the Port Mann project and they are also replacing pipe in Stanley Park (2020-2024). I guess we know why it's called Pipeline Road too.



http://www.metrovancouver.org/servic...k-water-tunnel
Holy smokes I can't wait for the anger that'll come from the environmentalists over this. It'll make Hawthorne Park look like a picnic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2018, 8:36 PM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipper316 View Post
Holy smokes I can't wait for the anger that'll come from the environmentalists over this. It'll make Hawthorne Park look like a picnic.
What for? It's a tunnel specifically to avoid significantly digging up the park.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2018, 7:05 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Mackinnon View Post
What for? It's a tunnel specifically to avoid significantly digging up the park.
Pretty sure there's gonna be some trees that are going to be cut down. Look what happened in Burnaby.http://www.burnabynow.com/news/forti...cre-1.23086242
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:49 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.