HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #441  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 7:04 AM
Millennium2002 Millennium2002 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,742
Actually, although trolley buses have their uses on hills, building a few new lines in the "suburbs" exclusively for them will raise a lot of flexibility issues.

In addition, it's worth noting that TransLink occasionally opts to cancel trolley bus service on certain steep portions of routes during periods of heavy snowfall for the same reason.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #442  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 8:05 AM
st7860 st7860 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,299
i meant what about electric buses(with batteries) for that route.? i don't mean trolleys since, construction of the overhead will cost a lot.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #443  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 8:15 AM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by st7860 View Post
i meant what about electric buses(with batteries) for that route.? i don't mean trolleys since, construction of the overhead will cost a lot.
Interesting idea. Going up the hill eats up a lot of gas - regenerative braking on the way down could go a long way toward recharging the batteries for the next trip up.

Still like the gondola concept better, though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #444  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 9:12 AM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 2,816
EV busses will still have issues with traction, etc in poor weather.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #445  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 2:55 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 21,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeeCee View Post
EV busses will still have issues with traction, etc in poor weather.
Is this because of excess torque or weight distribution?

EVs of any type are always heavier, I would expect that to be a benefit in the snow.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #446  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 2:56 PM
st7860 st7860 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,299
Of course the gondola is a better idea. However, there's many people against it.

For comparison, EV buses probably wouldn't benefit the other 'super busy' route, the 99, because traffic is so slow on Broadway anyway.

A properly designed EV bus could make it up the mountain a lot faster than diesel buses. There are snow tires available for buses. A good route such as this would encourage more people to live up there. There's already a thousand or so condos, with another 2 thousand on the way. However, its rare that people other than students who never go out, want to live on campus because the transportation to and from other places is too slow.

Although I'd guess that 'skytrain or light rail' to ubc gets built first, because in terms of funding for SFU, they supposedly have a more urgent need than making transportation better- the buildings at SFU need around 500 million of repairs. This was in the news a month ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #447  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2013, 12:52 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,187
Here's a snapshot of the Squamish gondola project from last weekend.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #448  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2013, 1:27 AM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
Blazed Member - Citygater
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 6,120
wow .... thanks great project for sure!
__________________
Quote of the Decade on SSP: "what happens would it be?" - argon007

"orange vested guy" - towerguy3
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #449  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2013, 9:47 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,361
Nice, thanks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #450  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2013, 10:10 PM
theKB theKB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 906
I am not totally sure why there is any debate over this project. It is relatively cheap and easy to execute with relatively simple construction. Frankly it has the potential for more ancillary benefits as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #451  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2013, 10:11 PM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 2,816
There isn't really any debate about it from anyone except for the people living directly underneath it. Translink doesn't have the budget to build it now, however. Maybe after the Evergreen line is done.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #452  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2013, 12:08 AM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeeCee View Post
There isn't really any debate about it from anyone except for the people living directly underneath it. Translink doesn't have the budget to build it now, however. Maybe after the Evergreen line is done.
There's little political will to get it done.

Benefits are all medium to long-term and Translink would incur a large capital cost. Sure, over time it pays for itself... and if Translink was a private company, it would definitely consider this an efficiency issue.

There are always people who oppose everything: http://www.katu.com/news/7207751.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #453  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2013, 12:56 AM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoNeurons View Post
There's little political will to get it done.

Benefits are all medium to long-term and Translink would incur a large capital cost. Sure, over time it pays for itself... and if Translink was a private company, it would definitely consider this an efficiency issue.
It would actually be cheaper for TransLink if it is done like most rapid transit project, where the province and federal government pays 1/3 each for the capital cost.

So assume the capital cost of the gondola is split into 1/3 each, for the next 25 years...:

Cost of bus service:
Capital for bus replacement: $0M (from federal gas found)
Operating cost for buses: $113M (TransLink pays 100%)
Total "actual" cost: $113M

Cost of gondola:
Construction cost: $38M (TransLink pays 1/3 of the capital cost)
Operating cost for gondola: $54M (TransLink pays 100%)
Total "actual" cost: $92M

But of course, the federal and provincial government need to get on board first. They also need to find the $38M to construct the project in the first place, which doesn't seems to be that hard when they can find $199M for fixing the Pattullo bridge...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #454  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2013, 12:53 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,187
Here is a bit wider and better cell phone snapshot from Friday.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #455  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2013, 3:35 AM
Millennium2002 Millennium2002 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,742
Is it just a mono-cable design? Or will there be extra wires added later on?

I ask this because I'm expecting at least two wires per direction given the wind gusts that occasionally appear on the West Coast, and because it'd be more similar to the proposed Burnaby Mountain Gondola, which was envisioned to have three per direction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #456  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2013, 8:30 AM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
Blazed Member - Citygater
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 6,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by allan_kuan View Post
Is it just a mono-cable design? Or will there be extra wires added later on?

I ask this because I'm expecting at least two wires per direction given the wind gusts that occasionally appear on the West Coast, and because it'd be more similar to the proposed Burnaby Mountain Gondola, which was envisioned to have three per direction.
mono as per the renders and info at >> http://www.seatoskygondola.com/
__________________
Quote of the Decade on SSP: "what happens would it be?" - argon007

"orange vested guy" - towerguy3
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #457  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2013, 8:45 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,361
Nice shot - you should send it to the Gondola Project:

http://gondolaproject.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #458  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2014, 4:10 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,187
Sea to Sky Gondola seems to be making great progress. I drove by yesterday and they already have all the cabines hanging. Seems that they will be on time to open in May.

They have some nice photos on their Instragram page: http://instagram.com/seatoskygondola

Ticket prices seem to be pretty horrible ($35/adult) and it is a shame that they don't have a similar annual pass system as Capila Suspension Bridge does.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #459  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2014, 4:31 AM
madog222 madog222 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,687
Pricey but not unreasonable, interesting that it's the same as a "friend of an edge card/season ticket holder" summer lift ticket at Whistler. Plus there are a few free alternatives with regards to the view, The Chief and trails out of Lions Bay.
This was never going to be anything other than a tourist trap like the Capilano Suspension Bridge anyways.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #460  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2014, 2:03 PM
idunno idunno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 754
They do actually! Check the instagram pictures there - $99 for an adult, and $249 for a family.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:07 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.