HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 3:48 PM
sopdx sopdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 487
Pearl Block 24 (NW 12th & Quimby) | 250' | 22 floors | Proposed

https://www.portlandmaps.com/detail/...A/4797384_did/

I believe this is the last - or close to it - major Hoyt Properties parcel in the Pearl. I remember it was identified in the original N. Pearl plan done by Bora years ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 4:15 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
Good find. I moved this to a new thread.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 4:18 PM
stan stan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 51
Wow. 400 apartments that is something. That’s a lot of units.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 6:45 PM
pdxsg34 pdxsg34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 317
These drawings of Block 245 were included in the drawings for Holden of Pearl during the review process. Let me know if you can't see anything, and I'll try uploading again.



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2022, 7:49 PM
AdamNorthwest AdamNorthwest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 78
Hard to imagine a residential tower of ~20 stories equaling 400+ feet, but encouraged by the proposal nonetheless.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2022, 5:09 PM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,784
This is great news, I have always been hopeful that we would see more taller towers at the north end of the Pearl.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2022, 8:04 PM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamNorthwest View Post
Hard to imagine a residential tower of ~20 stories equaling 400+ feet, but encouraged by the proposal nonetheless.
I was wondering this too, but - I'm no architect - the image is captioned "zoning envelope", which sounds to me like it just captures the maximum that could be built there, not necessarily what is proposed. Maccoinnich, does that sound right?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2022, 8:42 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
Correct
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted May 9, 2022, 1:25 AM
aleksant@gmail.com aleksant@gmail.com is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by maccoinnich View Post
Correct
I hope this does not get approved. How can they have 400 units and not to elicit traffic problems. I find it actually not a good idea.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted May 9, 2022, 5:33 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by aleksant@gmail.com View Post
I hope this does not get approved. How can they have 400 units and not to elicit traffic problems. I find it actually not a good idea.
I'm not involved in the research for this building, so I don't know what they have or haven't done, but the size of this building is in line with what has been planned for North Pearl. It would also be roughly 1.5x the size of the NV Apartment tower, so you can get a ballpark idea of what's the kind of traffic the building would produce.

With working from home and being in an urban setting, making it easier for people to walk to work or take transit, I would imagine that the impact on vehicle traffic would be fairly low since the buildings in the Pearl don't cause massive gridlock every day.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted May 9, 2022, 6:05 AM
PacificStates PacificStates is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by aleksant@gmail.com View Post
I hope this does not get approved. How can they have 400 units and not to elicit traffic problems. I find it actually not a good idea.
I think Urbanlife makes a great point. 400 units sounds like it would cause a lot of traffic, but The Collective on 4th has a similar amount of units and I used to live right next to it and was always surprised how little traffic the building produced. (I could see when cars came in and out of the parking garage)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted May 9, 2022, 5:21 PM
ORNative ORNative is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 262
Correct me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't the thread reflect a 24 story building? The description on Portland Maps states: "new 20-story residential tower over a 4-story base of residential, commercial, parking and amenity and lobby space with underground parking" - 20 stories on top of a 4 story podium - 24 stories?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted May 9, 2022, 6:19 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
Fair point - I changed the thread name, but it should be clearer once the preapp notice comes out
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted May 10, 2022, 11:31 PM
DMH DMH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Portland (part-time); warm foreign countries (part-time)
Posts: 506
Quote:
Originally Posted by aleksant@gmail.com View Post
I hope this does not get approved. How can they have 400 units and not to elicit traffic problems. I find it actually not a good idea.
I have to chuckle. Since when would a proposed tall building in an urban setting be stopped because of a perception that there would be too much traffic produced? Did that argument come up as mid-town Manhattan residential point towers were proposed? What about those cluster of towers in Chicago's Loop?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted May 11, 2022, 3:18 AM
CorbinWarrick CorbinWarrick is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMH View Post
I have to chuckle. Since when would a proposed tall building in an urban setting be stopped because of a perception that there would be too much traffic produced? Did that argument come up as mid-town Manhattan residential point towers were proposed? What about those cluster of towers in Chicago's Loop?
Lol tell me about it
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted May 11, 2022, 3:21 AM
2oh1's Avatar
2oh1 2oh1 is offline
9-7-2oh1-!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: downtown Portland
Posts: 2,486
Adding to what DMH and others said above: I live downtown, near the Safeway on Jefferson. I've been surprised by how little additional traffic was created by the towers that have gone up over here during the past 20 years. I was hoping for a lot more foot traffic than we've seen. And the car traffic along Jefferson in 2022 doesn't seem any worse than what I remember in 2002.

So, yeah, 400 units may sound like a lot, but really it's not. And this is the perfect neighborhood for it.

I hope this gets approved and I hope they build something handsome.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 4:59 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 5:52 PM
Tykendo Tykendo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 372
From the massing picture on the pre app, it looks to be similar size & height to The Vista. The shape of the tower is interesting at least. With nice glass, it should stand out there. But it definitely isn't going to reach that 410 ft height allowed. I remember the original renderings ( developer buildout for Pearl District) for that site, and it looked to be an elliptical shaped tower that would reach the max height. Kind of a bummer, but with nice design, and glass, decent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2022, 5:09 PM
colossalorder colossalorder is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 57
Noticed this for that last lot on NW Quimby by the Fields Park

Early Assistance
DA - Design Advice Request

A mixed-use development with approximately 430 for-rent residential units of varying sizes and approximately 300 parking stalls below and above-grade. The project is planned as a combination of a Type IA high-rise building (20 stories) and a low-rise Type IIIA wood building (4 stories) over a shared 3-story concrete podium. The ground floor fill have active ground floor spaces, including commercial, a residential lobby and amenity spaces for residents, as well as at-grade and walk-up residential units. Stormwater disposal will be achieved via a combination of eco-roofs and flow-through planter facilities. The project is targeting a Gold LEED or Earth Advantage certification (still TBD on which program)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2022, 7:38 PM
PhillyPDX PhillyPDX is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 393
Maybe the last significant empty lot to get developed in Pearl? At least until Broadway Corridor gets its act together. Plus nearby slabtown is nearly fully built up too (including active proposals). It's a pretty neat drive from NW 23rd through slabtown and into Pearl. Really is becoming almost a large, hip, contiguous neighborhood.

Once Pearl and Slabtown are built up (not far off now), I wonder where developers will turn? I love the feel of old town, it's such a shame it's in the state it's in. What a cool historic vibrant area that should be.

Or conversion of downtown offices to residential. With office vacancies at their current and seemingly new normal, costs will be relatively cheap.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:34 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.