HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #801  
Old Posted May 27, 2014, 4:15 AM
Blitz's Avatar
Blitz Blitz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Windsor, Ontario
Posts: 4,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by eternallyme View Post
My thinking right now:

OLP 46 - PCPO 40 - ONDP 21

Seat changes:

OLP -> PCPO
Brant
Glengarry-Prescott-Russell
Kitchener Centre
Ottawa-Orleans

OLP -> ONDP
London North Centre
Sault Ste. Marie
Sudbury
Thunder Bay-Atikokan
Thunder Bay-Superior North
Windsor West

PCPO -> OLP
Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Halton
Thornhill

PCPO -> ONDP
(none)

ONDP -> OLP
Bramalea-Gore-Malton
Davenport
Parkdale-High Park
Trinity-Spadina

ONDP -> PCPO
Essex
Niagara Falls

I don't see London North Centre going NDP. Deb Matthews has a pretty strong base in London - she's the health minister and deputy premiere and Londoners will want someone in cabinet like this to make sure the city isn't forgotten.

In Essex, the NDP incumbent is pretty strong and I don't see that riding going PC. Way too much anti-Hudak spreading outward there from suburban Windsor.

Windsor West has a chance of switching to NDP but I also think residents there see the benefit of holding onto a Liberal cabinet minister.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #802  
Old Posted May 27, 2014, 12:58 PM
eternallyme eternallyme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,243
As for how I spoiled? I cast a blank ballot or wrote a note of civil negativity (i.e. no foul language - polite yet blunt) attacking all parties.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #803  
Old Posted May 27, 2014, 1:44 PM
Jamaican-Phoenix's Avatar
Jamaican-Phoenix Jamaican-Phoenix is offline
R2-D2's army of death
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Downtown Ottawa
Posts: 3,576
I wish people would stop thinking they know what government is going to form. We could still end up with a PC minority or (God forbid) majority.
__________________
Franky: Ajldub, name calling is what they do when good arguments can't be found - don't sink to their level. Claiming the thread is "boring" is also a way to try to discredit a thread that doesn't match their particular bias.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #804  
Old Posted May 27, 2014, 2:05 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,184
Sometimes we're surprised, but polling and history go a long way to predicting outcomes.

I was surprised a couple weeks ago talking to some relatives in SW Ontario how much they hate Hudak. They totally hate the Liberals, whom they still associate with McGuinty, but will not vote for Hudak. They lean right so there is simply no option for them in this election. I think a lot of people are in that boat.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #805  
Old Posted May 27, 2014, 2:29 PM
Ottawa superman Ottawa superman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blitz View Post
I don't see London North Centre going NDP. Deb Matthews has a pretty strong base in London - she's the health minister and deputy premiere and Londoners will want someone in cabinet like this to make sure the city isn't forgotten.

In Essex, the NDP incumbent is pretty strong and I don't see that riding going PC. Way too much anti-Hudak spreading outward there from suburban Windsor.

Windsor West has a chance of switching to NDP but I also think residents there see the benefit of holding onto a Liberal cabinet minister.
To continue, the Liberal still have strong polling number in Eastern Ontario, and are fairly strong in Ottawa. The mayor, Jim Watson, is a former Liberal and is heading for re election. I suspect Ottawa Orleans and Prescott Russel, will stay Liberal.

An other issue, is the light rail expansion to Orleans is supported by the Liberal but opposed by the PC. That could also influence the vote.

Quote:
Originally Posted by flar View Post
Sometimes we're surprised, but polling and history go a long way to predicting outcomes.

I was surprised a couple weeks ago talking to some relatives in SW Ontario how much they hate Hudak. They totally hate the Liberals, whom they still associate with McGuinty, but will not vote for Hudak. They lean right so there is simply no option for them in this election. I think a lot of people are in that boat.
The Hudak hate can be very strong in Ottawa and Prescott Russell, especially among francophone, because Hudak is associated to the Harris government. The local candidates are respected, but the Leader does influence the vote.

Last edited by Ottawa superman; May 27, 2014 at 2:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #806  
Old Posted May 27, 2014, 4:33 PM
eternallyme eternallyme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,243
Yet Stephen Harper doesn't seem to be hated nearly as much in those parts of Ontario...most of the hate for him is in the urban core areas where any kind of Conservative would likely finish a distant 3rd, or even 4th.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #807  
Old Posted May 27, 2014, 5:18 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 11,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by eternallyme View Post
Yet Stephen Harper doesn't seem to be hated nearly as much in those parts of Ontario...most of the hate for him is in the urban core areas where any kind of Conservative would likely finish a distant 3rd, or even 4th.
Federal != Provincial. We're talking about a province that simulatenously supported Mike Harris and Jean Chretien.

In any case, the federal Liberals have had a constant lead over Harper's Conservatives for almost a year now, with LPC support in Ontario often over 40%.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #808  
Old Posted May 27, 2014, 5:28 PM
Jamaican-Phoenix's Avatar
Jamaican-Phoenix Jamaican-Phoenix is offline
R2-D2's army of death
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Downtown Ottawa
Posts: 3,576
Quote:
Originally Posted by flar View Post
Sometimes we're surprised, but polling and history go a long way to predicting outcomes.
Yet we're getting more and more inaccurate with our predictions and speculations.
__________________
Franky: Ajldub, name calling is what they do when good arguments can't be found - don't sink to their level. Claiming the thread is "boring" is also a way to try to discredit a thread that doesn't match their particular bias.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #809  
Old Posted May 27, 2014, 8:52 PM
Dr Nevergold Dr Nevergold is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 20,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamaican-Phoenix View Post
Yet we're getting more and more inaccurate with our predictions and speculations.
I thought the polls had been relatively accurate. The liberal surge in Quebec was detected before the election. The NDP and conservative surge in 2011 was accurate before the federal election.

Wynnes problem is that she better hope the party didn't peek to early.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #810  
Old Posted May 28, 2014, 12:12 AM
Jamaican-Phoenix's Avatar
Jamaican-Phoenix Jamaican-Phoenix is offline
R2-D2's army of death
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Downtown Ottawa
Posts: 3,576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Nevergold View Post
I thought the polls had been relatively accurate. The liberal surge in Quebec was detected before the election. The NDP and conservative surge in 2011 was accurate before the federal election.

Wynnes problem is that she better hope the party didn't peek to early.
The same pollsters initially predicted a PQ majority in Quebec, and a landslide Wildrose victory in Alberta.
__________________
Franky: Ajldub, name calling is what they do when good arguments can't be found - don't sink to their level. Claiming the thread is "boring" is also a way to try to discredit a thread that doesn't match their particular bias.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #811  
Old Posted May 28, 2014, 12:52 AM
Dr Nevergold Dr Nevergold is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 20,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamaican-Phoenix View Post
The same pollsters initially predicted a PQ majority in Quebec, and a landslide Wildrose victory in Alberta.
Depends on the pollster except for wildrose, that was a big screw up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #812  
Old Posted May 28, 2014, 2:28 AM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by eternallyme View Post
As for how I spoiled? I cast a blank ballot or wrote a note of civil negativity (i.e. no foul language - polite yet blunt) attacking all parties.
Could you explain why you wouldn't just decline the ballot?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #813  
Old Posted May 28, 2014, 3:17 AM
Jamaican-Phoenix's Avatar
Jamaican-Phoenix Jamaican-Phoenix is offline
R2-D2's army of death
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Downtown Ottawa
Posts: 3,576
Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Could you explain why you wouldn't just decline the ballot?
Spoiling a ballot sends a stronger message. It says "I came out here, waited in line, proved who I am, got behind a booth/divider, and deliberately spoiled my ballot. That is how fed up I am with the system and the parties involved."
__________________
Franky: Ajldub, name calling is what they do when good arguments can't be found - don't sink to their level. Claiming the thread is "boring" is also a way to try to discredit a thread that doesn't match their particular bias.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #814  
Old Posted May 28, 2014, 4:08 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,587
Spoiling your ballot is easily confused with someone who unintentionally filled it out incorrectly, declining a ballot can only be done purposefully.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #815  
Old Posted May 28, 2014, 4:35 AM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 11,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
Spoiling your ballot is easily confused with someone who unintentionally filled it out incorrectly, declining a ballot can only be done purposefully.
Depends on how you spoil. The way eternallyme suggested works well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #816  
Old Posted May 28, 2014, 1:33 PM
eternallyme eternallyme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Could you explain why you wouldn't just decline the ballot?
I didn't know it was an option. I know federally it is not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #817  
Old Posted May 28, 2014, 1:37 PM
eternallyme eternallyme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Nevergold View Post
Depends on the pollster except for wildrose, that was a big screw up.
The initial PQ majority polls were real, but the talk of separation killed them later on.

The Wildrose were likely not ahead as much as they wanted to punish the PC's and they were a default option (they aren't going Liberal or NDP).

The BC polling issue...well...hard to explain that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #818  
Old Posted May 28, 2014, 4:58 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 23,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by eternallyme View Post
As for how I spoiled? I cast a blank ballot or wrote a note of civil negativity (i.e. no foul language - polite yet blunt) attacking all parties.
Apparently, that's illegal. ,
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #819  
Old Posted May 28, 2014, 6:50 PM
eternallyme eternallyme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,243
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toront...656964?cmp=rss

Wynne is walking into a minefield now. Horwath needs to steer clear and say no to any formal coalition, especially in a PC minority, since she would be seen as propping up corruption. When the Liberals, NDP and Bloc proposed the coalition in 2008, their poll numbers tanked and the federal Conservatives were in absolute majority territory in Ontario (the post-coalition polls had them around 55% in Ontario, which is about where the federal Liberals were in the Chretien era).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #820  
Old Posted May 28, 2014, 7:00 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 19,880
Nothing wrong with a coalition government.

If the PC get a minority, let them table a budget. If the PC can't get the approval of the Liberal or NDP than they can form a partnership much like the Peterson/Rae agreement.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:04 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.