HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #261  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2015, 3:19 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is online now
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
I hold out hope that eventually GWL will relent and allow some development along that stretch. Although the houses were demolished, there seems to be enough space left over to rebuild something there - obviously an expansion of the parking lot isn't happening.

I have often been tempted to try and build a case to get that last remaining house from GWL. I seem to remember reading about a process a citizen can undertake in situations were a property remains derelict.

Something similar to this.

Someone get on it.
GWL is turning that last remaining house into a daycare. They are building additions of 2 faux houses on either side of it to resemble the lost street-scape. So that portion of the street will have 5 individual "looking" houses interconnected to form one continuous building.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #262  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2015, 3:22 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ Lipstick on a pig. That streetscape around there is just heinous.

I get that GWL is not in business to make urbanists happy, but man, I wish there could have been a better way than just letting them demolish like 10% of West Broadway for surface parking.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #263  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2015, 3:35 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is online now
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
GWL is turning that last remaining house into a daycare. They are building additions of 2 faux houses on either side of it to resemble the lost street-scape. So that portion of the street will have 5 individual "looking" houses interconnected to form one continuous building.
Interesting. I guess that is better than I hoped would happen with that house.

Although time will tell if it doesn't turn into the usual bait-and-switch... I presume it is cheaper to demolish and rebuild, versus rehab'ing that house - especially into a commercial venture.

I like to think it was me complaining to the City (and arguing with the inspector) about their upkeep of that house a few years ago that led to them finally deciding to develop it...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #264  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2015, 7:24 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
GWL is turning that last remaining house into a daycare. They are building additions of 2 faux houses on either side of it to resemble the lost street-scape. So that portion of the street will have 5 individual "looking" houses interconnected to form one continuous building.
51 Balmoral St..? They are constructing one continous structure on either side of the home and closing off the backlane to the left?

https://www.google.com/maps/@49.8833...7i13312!8i6656
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #265  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2015, 7:34 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Yeah they will be...

The Great West Child Facility...

Prairie Architects ..
http://clkapps.winnipeg.ca/DMIS/View...ba/2015/a14645
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #266  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2015, 7:39 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is online now
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,001
^ Nice find.

Looks good actually. Can never have too many daycares.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #267  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2015, 7:47 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ Yeah, that's interesting... although I am a bit anxious as to how this is going to work out.

Wrapping an entirely new institutional building around a neglected old house, and then throw Prairie Architects into the mix... once all is said and done we might be wishing the surface parking was back.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #268  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2015, 8:05 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is online now
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,001
^ true. But in this instance, it doesn't seem like anything was going to wrestle control over this house from GWL (save from someone burning it to the ground). So IMO, something is better than nothing.

The house (foundation mostly) is likely too far gone for the modest means of someone trying to rehab it back to single family use.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #269  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2015, 8:48 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,029
It is surprising what some people will do to fix a house. A fellow I know bought a house on Bredin this spring that was tipping toward the river. He lifted it and underpinned and spruced it up and now it looks champion. It looked like a teardown before, from the outside anyway.

http://www.realtor.ca/Residential/Si...-East-Kildonan
__________________
Get off my lawn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #270  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2015, 8:51 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is online now
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,001
^ location location location!

looks nice though. Good price as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #271  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2015, 9:08 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ That house looks great.

Slightly off topic but I'll say it anyway... Bredin itself is a nice street although the surroundings are not ideal in my books. I did a drive by of that house on the NW corner that was on the market forever and while the house was very nice and I love the central location, Bredin itself is a bit of a tiny island next to a really busy, not very pedestrian friendly street (Henderson). In the end we just couldn't square the idea of kids running around there, riding bikes, etc. with all the traffic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #272  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 12:56 AM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,029
The house on the corner is a disaster. Obviously you didn't really look at it.
__________________
Get off my lawn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #273  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 2:02 AM
Bdog's Avatar
Bdog Bdog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ Lipstick on a pig. That streetscape around there is just heinous.

I get that GWL is not in business to make urbanists happy, but man, I wish there could have been a better way than just letting them demolish like 10% of West Broadway for surface parking.
To be fair, there were only about 20 houses or so demolished for surface parking behind GWL. The rest was the old stadium grounds.

Maybe it's a blessing in disguise that the strip of Balmoral hasn't been redeveloped. We need that land available for when Osborne Stadium returns in 2063.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #274  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 2:14 AM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman View Post
The house on the corner is a disaster. Obviously you didn't really look at it.
I didn't actually go in... just looked online and drove by it. The setting was enough to make me leave it alone. I don't think I'd be crazy about being forced to cross one of the major city arteries like Portage, Main, Henderson or Pembina just to get anywhere else.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #275  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 12:19 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,029
Needs a $30,000 shake roof, addition upon addition, three furnaces....
__________________
Get off my lawn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #276  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 1:24 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ Yikes. Oh well, good luck to whoever bought it... the riverfront location is lovely!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #277  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 1:34 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,029
It didn't sell, it was taken off the market.
__________________
Get off my lawn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #278  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 3:00 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post

The house (foundation mostly) is likely too far gone for the modest means of someone trying to rehab it back to single family use.
I believe the Heritage III status of the home is playing into thier decision to go the route they've chosen to a large degree. Exterior modifications are permitted, subject to approval while they could pretty much gut the interior and start from scratch. Add the incentives to the equation to do so, build, maintain the property, etc. you have a win/win scenario. I think the 96 Daycare spaces are a great addition to the area, although the other unit additions are just an added bonus to make it more viable in the long term and acceptable to develope?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #279  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 4:40 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyro View Post
I believe the Heritage III status of the home is playing into thier decision to go the route they've chosen to a large degree. Exterior modifications are permitted, subject to approval while they could pretty much gut the interior and start from scratch. Add the incentives to the equation to do so, build, maintain the property, etc. you have a win/win scenario. I think the 96 Daycare spaces are a great addition to the area, although the other unit additions are just an added bonus to make it more viable in the long term and acceptable to develope?
Are they actually public daycare spaces though or just for staff?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #280  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 4:56 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Milner House, as far as I understand will have room to accommodate 96 children in a "child care capacity"..Fun note with all the talk of a huge surface parking lot...There will be 10 spaces for staff and 10 for child drop-off added to the proposal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:20 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.