Quote:
Originally Posted by jhausner
As long as they don't remove car infrastructure for bike infrastructure I have no issue with bike lane. That's the issue in Vancouver is you are putting both groups at odds with each other far too often and making it seem like "If you need to drive a car you are an evil human being hell-bent on the destruction of the Earth" and that's what tends to piss me off.
In Surrey they aren't putting cyclists against motor vehicles or busses. Maybe we just have the space to do it or maybe our Mayor, Council, and city staff do a better job of selling and implementing the idea. Several other cities also do a far better job that Vancouver in the department of not pissing car drivers, businesses, and everyone other than cyclists off.
Vancouver just irks me the way they handle this topic. Well in all honesty Vancouver Mayor and Council irk me about how they handle _every_ topic.
|
Yes but quite often the routes in Surrey are 1.3 m lanes (1.8m is standard) on roads with trucks with speeds of 60 km/hr with vehicle lanes that are too narrow. Take King George south of 64th Ave to Hwy 10.
Speed 70 km/hr
Left Lane width: 3.3m
Right Lane width: 2.9m
Bike Lane width (including curb & gutter): 1.3m
If beside a tractor trailer, typically 2.6m wide driving in the centre of its lane, with the cyclist in the centre of it's lane with handlebars 0.6m wide leaves a space of 0.7m between the cyclist and the passing truck with a speed difference of 50km/hr. If the cyclist moves fully over almost riding in the gutter they would have maximum 1m.
(the truck can not move over as another vehicle could be in the lane beside)
Now what is being sacrificed here? Well the cycle lanes are too narrow, space is being eaten up with the nice 3.6m wide centre median which Surrey gets money from ICBC to put in so vehicles do not hit eachother head on. Sacrificing vehicle space NO, sacrificing the usefulness of the bike lane and its safety, YES.
Thankfully new projects are supposed to put in place 1.8m lanes if they are possible. Lets hope so.
Yes Surrey is not removing car infrastructure but they are not giving good cycling infrastructures as a result!
(recent projects include the brand new 96 ave, and the existing 64th Ave repainting). Otherwise we should be sacrificing the turn lanes and the medians to build the proper widths or buy property.
Thats why it is so important to build these bike boulevards off the main streets and put in the greenways.