Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack
This is pretty accurate. There are still lots of Vietnamese people settled and even a trickle arriving in Montreal and Paris who are plug and play in French. But I suspect this is a bit of selection bias and obviously not reflective of the situation on the ground in Vietnam. Eventually it will peter out.
The same is true of Romania which for a time provided quite a few immigrants to France and Quebec who were plug and play in French right off the plane.
Romania is probably somewhere in between Vietnam and Lebanon when it comes to French.
|
Romania having a strong French influence is kind of surprising, without any historical or geographical context. Romania is geographically not close to France from a European perspective, while two other large Romance-speaking countries, Italy and Spain, are. I can get that a Romance language tie between France and Romania exist, but why these two in particular? Aside from French previously being more widespread as a second language and previously being among the most prestigious in the western world overall (eg. I mean, I know, not just in Anglo-Canada, but French was commonly learned as the second language in countries like the UK and US, though Spanish seems to have taken its place increasingly towards the present).
Also, I'm still kind of curious as to why French took hold more in Lebanon than in Vietnam. Both equally had a strong national language (Arabic and Vietnamese) that could take hold after the colonizers left. Googling quickly suggests that both French Indochina and the French Mandate for Syria and Lebanon did not last particularly long -- one existed from the late 19th century to the '50s, while the other lasted from the '20s to the '40s. If anything, French rule was shorter in Lebanon, so in theory there'd be less time for the language to take hold prior to independence. Perhaps because the Near East is geographically nearer to Europe than the Far East, and it was easier to reinforce ties to Europe, maybe that's why French lasted longer (and the Near/Middle East has had more interaction with Europe than the Far East for a really long time, for example going back to the Crusades, and to Classical Antiquity and before).