Quote:
Originally Posted by M II A II R II K
I guess it's set up. Although I could only move the Edmonton threads here that I could identify, there could be many Edmonton threads left in the main section. Another mod would have to move them.
|
having scanned the threads and classifications, if anyone can tell me why (other than some esoteric "technical" reason or rule, neither of which seems to be the case) why calgary and edmonton are not set up as equals in terms of their navigation on the site - and make the response logical enough to maintain the difference - i'll accept it.
but the "logic" of including alberta and british columbia "together" and then differentiating between edmonton and calgary truly escapes me. i prefered the combined alberta "local" because i might visit a calgary thread of interest that was "there" but i won't move around from forum to forum to try and catch those same threads and am almost sure to have less in common with most of threads that this combination puts up front than was there previously.
it's bad enough that the victoria and kelowna and north vancouver island construction threads are now more accessible as they are on the "front page" of the combined british columbia and alberta local (to which i agree with feepa - if combined they should at least be alphabetical...). having edmonton construction buried unless you change your bookmark (which we might do but a visitor surely won't) doesn't seem to be a step forward to me in terms of having what's presented on the site up front and accessible to those interested enough to be here. surely edmonton and calgary have much more in common than either of us have with "north vancouver island".