HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 10:10 PM
Trantor's Avatar
Trantor Trantor is offline
FUS RO DAH!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Ecumenopolis
Posts: 15,515
SAO PAULO | E-Tower

Whats your opinion on this tower? At the same time, I like it but seems there are something missing...

149 meters high, 39 floors.



















__________________
________________________________________
Easy, Tychus. This ain´t science fiction

Last edited by Trantor; Jan 10, 2007 at 11:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 10:14 PM
plinko's Avatar
plinko plinko is offline
them bones
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Barbara adjacent
Posts: 6,849
A little Freed, a little Pei, a little Stubbins, even a little Seidler...all rolled up into a slick little package.

What do you think is missing?
__________________
Even if you are 1 in a million, there are still 7,000 people just like you...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 10:22 PM
kenc kenc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 99
I like it fine. Not the best design I have ever seen, but the towers in Sao Paulo tend to be somewhat boxy and plain.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 10:33 PM
Lecom's Avatar
Lecom Lecom is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: the Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 12,703
Very Minneapolis. Which is a good thing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 10:35 PM
Trantor's Avatar
Trantor Trantor is offline
FUS RO DAH!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Ecumenopolis
Posts: 15,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenc View Post
I like it fine. Not the best design I have ever seen, but the towers in Sao Paulo tend to be somewhat boxy and plain.
no they dont

the fact is that there is over 40 thousand highrises (12+ floors buildings, Emporis definition) in São Paulo, so many are bland and "erase" from the view the good ones.

I will soon create a thread with the 150 best highrises in São Paulo. (it wont include every good highrise, nor it will include tall and important but imho ugly or bland buildings)


As for what is missing in this tower, I am not sure. Maybe the texture could be more intricated?
__________________
________________________________________
Easy, Tychus. This ain´t science fiction
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 11:45 PM
kool maudit's Avatar
kool maudit kool maudit is offline
what it is
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Helsingør
Posts: 10,747
it is a cheap version of ibm-marathon.

__________________
here's why that's a problem
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 12:26 AM
Trantor's Avatar
Trantor Trantor is offline
FUS RO DAH!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Ecumenopolis
Posts: 15,515
care to explain why you think its CHEAP??

btw, maybe this IBM Marathon building is a cheap version of that Frankfurt building then...
__________________
________________________________________
Easy, Tychus. This ain´t science fiction
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 9:19 PM
alps's Avatar
alps alps is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,401
Looks good, if I could change one thing I would probably want to have them work on the base a bit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 10:58 PM
village person's Avatar
village person village person is offline
JFDinJax, founded c.1998
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kansas City / Jacksonville
Posts: 1,866
Those ridiculous overhanging watchamadoodles are just overdone. Why can't a curved glass wall just END, without bangs?!!? Why does it always have to look like it's wearing a %&#*ing baseball cap?!?!?!?! IT'S ALL SO #$%@* *$&@*$ED UP!!! WHO ARE THESE %^#@%ING &%#S WHO *$%^#ING COME UP WITH THESE $^#&@ES?!?!?!?!?!?! DON'T LOOK AT ME LIKE THAT!!!!! FFPPPBBLLLIT!!!!!!!!!!!! Actually, it looks nice!

Last edited by village person; Jan 11, 2007 at 11:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 11:09 PM
marcus's Avatar
marcus marcus is offline
marcus
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: BALWASHAREA
Posts: 783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trantor View Post
btw, maybe this IBM Marathon building is a cheap version of that Frankfurt building then...
I don't think it's that way just because of the fact that the minneapolis one was built a year earlier before the one in frankfurt.

Anyway, I kind of like this building
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 12:26 AM
Trantor's Avatar
Trantor Trantor is offline
FUS RO DAH!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Ecumenopolis
Posts: 15,515
^but I preffer the Frankfurt building over the Mineappolis one...
__________________
________________________________________
Easy, Tychus. This ain´t science fiction
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 1:59 AM
architect1 architect1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: hamilton soon Toronto
Posts: 412
I like it its a great po mo building. I would of made it 2 times the size it is now. but thats just 2 double the floor space. looks kinda tight.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 3:06 AM
marcus's Avatar
marcus marcus is offline
marcus
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: BALWASHAREA
Posts: 783
I feel that this building is kind of unoriginal, because this disign exists in franfurt,minneapolis,and montreal, but I still like this building alot. I wish it were taller though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 9:34 AM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,379
Yeah, I think the criticism is that the design is rather generic, and looks like it may have been on a tighter budget (at least the exterior) than ones that look similar to it.

I'm a little confused as to why you seem to be defensive when you asked us our opinion on this building. I could see if someone totally trashed the design, but no one has done any such thing. In fact, most people find it a decent design, if even one repeated around the world, and maybe with more attention given to the facade of the other one's similar to this one. It's a decent design that could be worse. It could also be better, and even you implied that by saying that you think it's missing something. We're simply offering our opinion on what we think you say is "missing."
__________________
Where the trees are the right height
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 4:02 PM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,823
I think it's fine. One thing that is beginning to change in architecture is facades with more layers and depth. This one is pretty flat faced. Nothing wrong with that, but that was more of a trend in the early 90's. I think that's where people get the "boring" idea from. They want more layers to add interest.

I like this tower though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 5:29 PM
staff's Avatar
staff staff is offline
low life in a tall place
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Singapore.SG | Malmö.SE
Posts: 5,546
Feels like I've seen it before but better looking.
This one looks pretty good, but feels kind of "cheap" as someone else stated in this thread.
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 6:09 PM
M.K. M.K. is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: §¡კ₪@דч®ɛ€...۩™ -> աաա
Posts: 3,934
Thumbs up Clean

I came also from the city of this Building Sao Paulo - SP Brazil and as I live abroad, I do not know personally this building up to now, only in photos. Regarding to its architecture, I see something common as the other ones in Berrini Avenue, its area of Faria Lima Avenue. The architecture is clean, easy in composing, similiar to hotel Melià in Marginal Pinheiros complex, and a little bit of Burj Dubai, a very small version for Sao Paulo with terraces divided in blocks of the building in different high places, something common already used in USA. It's a common modern building, but not even futuristic. A small version of quite used a lot architecture of mark highrises abroad. For daily tasks in office, I liked it. This is the problem today of Sao Paulo, they build a lot from 100m - 200m, but not a postcard building that is a point of reference. The city is an ocean of buildings quite similar in high and type with just small different aspects in architecture. There is no plan in doing a skyline with pieces of blocks considering a postcard at all, like Dubai and Pudong area in China for example. What is the skyline of Sao Paulo in the confusion city it is?. Maybe the Tv towers above buildings in Paulista avenuejust because they are in top of a hill, , that make a difference using the natural high quote of the mountain. Considering an unique building as postcard, it is not.

Last edited by M.K.; Jan 14, 2007 at 6:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2007, 12:20 PM
LosAngelesBeauty's Avatar
LosAngelesBeauty LosAngelesBeauty is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,600
It looks plain.

I actually like the back side of the tower better.

The front of the tower with its curved facade looks soo plain. There is definitely something "missing."
__________________
Check out my blog DTLA Rising
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2007, 9:44 PM
RLS_rls's Avatar
RLS_rls RLS_rls is offline
▓▒░
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,601
I think it's a very nice, but average, office building. You wouldn't really miss it on a skyline, but it would be pretty subtle.

I'm not quite sure about that overhang though. It could use some work.
__________________
ಠ_ಠ
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2007, 2:57 AM
phillyskyline's Avatar
phillyskyline phillyskyline is offline
Monomania w/ Skyscrapers
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In the sky with other skyscrapers
Posts: 2,542
I like the design, but most towers in Sao Paulo don't exceed 200 meters, right? So this probably will not stick out in terms of height.
__________________
"OK gang, you know the rules, no humping, no licking, no sniffing hineys."
Harry Dunne
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:29 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.