HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2008, 5:16 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,154
lighted tops

is this a trend or a requirement?

seems any new highrise has a lighted top

so is it just a building trend or a requirement?

its a great thing no matter what
]
just wondering
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2008, 5:39 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,359
A lot of mechanical penthouses are quite poorly done.
I'd rather see a properly integrated mechanical penthouse than the blank walls of one highlighted by floodlights.
Internal lighting usually works well (Residences on Georgia).

Worst of the bunch is The Bentley - massive ugly concrete box (not lit luckily), Paris Place at International Village, or Jardine's Lookout.

Well integrated: Mondrian I & II, Domus, Eden, Miro, Brava, Genesis, Grace, Space, L'Hermitage.

The most recently lit one I've noticed is the Silver Sea (Concord Pacific next to Granville Bridge) - changing colours like at the Edgewater Casino.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2008, 5:40 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,542
I'm not normally a grammar Nazi, but 'lighted tops'? I believe the proper way to write it would be 'lit tops'. Lighted means to fall or descend.

Anyway, I think lit tops/crowns are great. Unfortunately, they get turned off pretty quickly on condo towers after a strata forms. No one wants to pay the extra electrical bill. The Melville is a perfect example.
Here in Shanghai it's all the rage. I always keep my eyes open to see what lighting schemes the new buildings come up with.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2008, 6:26 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,154
it's alive and well in burnaby - the OMA's, watercolours, Legacy are all lit up and the highgate village ones

its nice to see when driving down hwy #1 at least

they stick out a lot more than downtown as they don't get lost among the forest of towers
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2008, 6:28 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,154
my bad i don't really pay attention to grammar and wording online
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2008, 6:50 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,347
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
it's alive and well in burnaby - the OMA's, watercolours, Legacy are all lit up and the highgate village ones

its nice to see when driving down hwy #1 at least

they stick out a lot more than downtown as they don't get lost among the forest of towers
I've heard rumours that nimbys are trying to get the exterior lighting at Highate turned off.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2008, 6:55 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,359
Come to think of it - are the light pipes atop the Wall Centre towers still lit? (each one has a lightpipe)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2008, 7:08 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
I've heard rumours that nimbys are trying to get the exterior lighting at Highate turned off.
wouldn't doubt it - they got the skytrain stations art installation lights turned off

i loved those colour changing cube like things
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2008, 7:22 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,359
@ Holdom? Those were cool.
Is it only after certain hours, or permanently turned off?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2008, 7:44 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,347
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
wouldn't doubt it - they got the skytrain stations art installation lights turned off

i loved those colour changing cube like things
That is ridiculous. Who could that possibly bother?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2008, 10:13 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
@ Holdom? Those were cool.
Is it only after certain hours, or permanently turned off?
i haven't seen them on in a long while

before the towers went up i think is when i last saw them on

cause you used to be able to see them well from hwy #1

and driving west down lougheed now nothing
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2008, 11:17 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,359
Even the William Farrell Building (Telus) at Robson & Seymour had a fibre optic lighting system with changing colours when it was renovated - it was functional for maybe a year or less. It wasn't garish, (the lights were focussed on the building from each major mullion junction) so the condos across the street would not have been directly shone into.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2008, 3:38 PM
204 204 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Terminal City
Posts: 1,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by giallo View Post
I'm not normally a grammar Nazi, but 'lighted tops'? I believe the proper way to write it would be 'lit tops'. Lighted means to fall or descend.
Lighted and lit mean the same thing. Like spelled and spelt.

I think "illuminated" would maybe be more descriptive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:17 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.