County officially to oppose casino
Public hearingsClark County public hearings on negotiating a new memorandum of understanding with the Cowlitz Tribe:
- 6 p.m. Monday, La Center High School, 725 Highland Road.
- 6 p.m. Thursday, Maple Grove Middle School, 12500 N.E. 199th St., Battle Ground.
- 10 a.m. April 15, Clark County Public Service Center, 1300 Franklin St.
Saturday, April 05, 2008
By JEFFREY MIZE and MICHAEL ANDERSEN, Columbian Staff Writers
Clark County’s commissioners will vote Tuesday on a resolution that states their opposition to “a major commercial gaming facility in unincorporated Clark County” without mentioning the Cowlitz Indian Tribe.
Commissioners have scheduled the vote for the morning after the first of three public hearings on negotiating a new casino deal with the Cowlitz.
Commissioners previously have voiced opposition to gambling and said they would prefer to see the tribe build a business park, not a casino, on a 152-acre site a couple miles west of La Center.
But they haven’t passed a resolution, as the anti-casino group Citizens Against Reservation Shopping requested last month.
“I’m delighted,” said Tom Hunt, a spokesman for the Vancouver-based group. “Might as well get it into one place.”
Commissioner Marc Boldt said commissioners decided to put the resolution on their agenda for one reason.
“To make CARS happy,” Boldt said. “Quite sweet and simple, I guess.”
Phil Harju, a member of the Cowlitz Tribal Council and its designated casino spokesman, said he didn’t think the resolution would apply to the tribe’s casino.
“When the land is taken into trust, it will not be a commercial casino,” he said. “It will be a tribal casino.”
But if the resolution means that commissioners oppose the tribe’s plan, Harju said, he hopes it will be voted down.
Hearings begin Monday
The county is pursuing an unusual strategy of passing a resolution against the Cowlitz casino as it prepares for a new round of negotiations with the tribe for that very project.
With the first in a series of three hearings set for Monday night in La Center, casino foes are marshaling their forces and cranking up the political pressure.
“It’s time to kill the bad deal — once and for all,” proclaims the Web site of Citizens for a Healthy Clark County, the consortium consisting of the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde and three other organizations that has paid for television ads attacking the memorandum of understanding the county signed with the Cowlitz Tribe in 2004.
The American Land Rights Association, a group headed by Battle Ground activist Chuck Cushman, is calling on casino opponents to flood the hearings.
“Call your friends, call your neighbors — there must be a big turnout for the casino hearings,” the group said in an “urgent action alert” distributed Friday. “You must tell the commissioners — no MOU, no agreement, no casino, period.”
A state hearings board declared the MOU invalid last year because the county violated a state law requiring early and continuous public participation in what amounted to a growth-management decision. A Thurston County Superior Court judge subsequently upheld the hearings board’s order.
Commissioners have taken a dual approach: appealing the judge’s decision and announcing they want a new agreement with the tribe. There’s only one problem. Tribal representatives say they are ready to discuss “refinements,” but they say they are unwilling to negotiate an entirely new deal.
“The tribe believes the MOU is a solid agreement which adequately addresses the impacts of potential tribal development and sees no need to renegotiate the MOU beyond any such refinements,” Ed Fleisher, an Olympia attorney representing the tribe, wrote in a March 13 letter to the county.
But Commissioner Steve Stuart said he believes the tribe will come to the negotiating table.
“If I didn’t believe they were willing to negotiate, I wouldn’t participate in any hearings,” he said.
Stuart is perhaps the pivotal swing vote on the three-member board of commissioners. Betty Sue Morris, the only holdover from when the 2004 deal was approved, believes a tribal casino is all but inevitable and the county is currently “unprotected” from the Cowlitz casino’s effects.
In contrast, Boldt comes across as the most hostile to the casino and has repeatedly said he wouldn’t have signed the MOU in the first place.
No list
Stuart has been unwilling to offer a laundry list of what he would like to see in a new agreement, which has frustrated tribal officials
“If the county has some specific things they want to address with the tribe, we are willing to listen,” Harju said. “But they haven’t given us anything.”
Stuart said the tribe’s project has grown, up to a $510 million complex with a 134,150-square-foot casino, since the MOU was signed four years ago. And that likely means Stuart expects the tribe to come up with more money to offset the project’s effects.
The 2004 agreement required the tribe to comply with county building and health codes, to build roads and intersections to keep traffic flowing, to pay for law enforcement and prosecution of misdemeanor crimes, and to compensate the county and other local governments for lost property taxes.
It also required the tribe to deposit 2 percent of net gambling revenues into an “arts and education fund” to support various charitable activities.
Those provisions, Stuart said, are no longer sufficient to cover the project’s effects.
“When the development project changes, so must the mitigation,” he said. “I’m open to suggestions. … Are they looking at a bigger price tag? Yes. But they are looking at a bigger bank book.”
“I have no reason to get my teeth kicked in for no good reason,” Stuart added. “Anyone who thinks it’s just a walk in the park for us to have these hearings hasn’t been paying attention.”
Grand Ronde pressure
The Grand Ronde, owners and operators of the Spirit Mountain Casino near the Oregon coast, are bankrolling a new series of television commercials to protect their status as having the casino closest to the Portland-Vancouver market. The latest commercial features several local residents talking, including one man who says: “Our Clark County leaders have a mandate to protect us from a huge casino, not to enable one.”
During the past two years, the Grand Ronde Tribal Council has transferred $815,000 from its gambling revenues to oppose the Cowlitz casino. But Siobhan Taylor, the tribe’s public affairs director, said she believes less than $100,000 has been spent to date.
“We are here to help the citizens of Clark County,” Taylor said.
Stuart, for one, said he is not persuaded by the Grand Ronde’s commercials.
“I have zero respect for an organization that is preaching community but is practicing pocketbook,” Stuart said. “They can keep running their ads and spending their money, and frankly, it is what it is. But nobody should have any misconceptions about their motives.”
The Grand Ronde, he said, have the same motivation for opposing the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs’ plans to build a casino in the Columbia River Gorge.
“It’s not because they love the gorge,” Stuart said. “They love their money.”
“Mr. Stuart obviously has his biases,” Taylor replied, “and he is entitled to his opinions.”
“All of our elected officials need to be very open and aware they are elected to serve and their electorate is watching them,” she added. “His words are hurtful, but certainly they are not true. And in no way are they going to stop us supporting citizens in the area who don’t want to see a misguided agreement go through.”
Federal review process
Meanwhile, the federal government is taking a leisurely approach to reviewing the tribe’s request to designate land along the west side of Interstate 5 as its initial reservation.
A preliminary version of the project’s financial environmental impact statement was released to local and state governments in March 2007, but hardly a peep has been heard from the feds in the past 13 months.
“The EIS is still under review with the solicitor’s office in Washington, D.C.,” George Skibine, director of the Interior Department’s Office of Indian Gaming Management, said in a brief e-mail to The Columbian Friday. “I am not sure, but I suspect that the major issue is simply backlog in that office.”