HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2601  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2017, 1:20 AM
Derek Derek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 9,544
It's honestly not that bad for a storage building...
__________________
Portlandia
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2602  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2017, 4:16 AM
RainDog's Avatar
RainDog RainDog is offline
Semi-Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: PDX
Posts: 277
A low bar, but valid point. It's really not bad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2603  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2017, 7:43 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,399
Quote:
Pearl gets its hotel at last

A new hotel in the Pearl District is aiming at tourists and business travelers alike.



The swimming pool at the Hampton Inn Pearl says it all. It has a sober lap pool at one end, and a kids' water play area at the other, complete with tiny slide, torrential bucket and weeping toadstool.

There are few other business hotels in the area. The yellow-clad Residence Inn by Marriott Portland Downtown/Pearl District has a strong line in business travelers, and is just a five-minute walk from Union Station. Many a listicle has been generated trying to name 10 Pearl District hotels. But of the Ace, the Mark Spencer and even McMenamin's Crystal Hotel, none of them are very close to Northwest Glisan and 10th Avenue, which is considered the heart of the Pearl.
...continues at the Business Tribune.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2604  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2017, 4:55 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,399
Modera Pearl









__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2605  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2017, 12:18 AM
QAtheSky QAtheSky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 104
The Modera has taken quite a while to wrap up the exterior work, mostly smaller skeleton crews working intermittently. I wonder why?

The lobby is open now and all the ground floor apartments next to it on 13th still need need exterior work to complete.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2606  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2018, 8:23 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,399
Notice of a Pre-Application Conference for 815 W Burnside St. Would be great to see that Firestone redeveloped.

(If they get the project submitted before May they can avoid a new and dumb requirement of the Central City 2035 plan: buildings along the Park Blocks have to be set back 12' from the property line.)
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2607  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2018, 8:38 PM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,777
Quote:
Originally Posted by maccoinnich View Post
Notice of a Pre-Application Conference for 815 W Burnside St. Would be great to see that Firestone redeveloped.

(If they get the project submitted before May they can avoid a new and dumb requirement of the Central City 2035 plan: buildings along the Park Blocks have to be set back 12' from the property line.)
At the base or some amount of feet up? If it is at the base, that makes no sense because there is a street between the park blocks and any building. The plus to this is that most of what is built along the Park Blocks probably isn't ever going anywhere.

And yes, I have been wanting to see that Firestone site redeveloped for years. Of course I have also been wanting to see the underused blocks at 10th and W Burnside redeveloped for years too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2608  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2018, 8:47 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,399
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife View Post
At the base or some amount of feet up? If it is at the base, that makes no sense because there is a street between the park blocks and any building. The plus to this is that most of what is built along the Park Blocks probably isn't ever going anywhere.
From the new zoning code:

Quote:
Standards for the Park Blocks. On sites with frontage on a street shown on Map 510-22, and on sites that are adjacent to an open area shown on Map 510-22, buildings must be set back at least 12 feet from the street or adjacent lot line along at least 75 percent of the length of the lot line. At least 50 percent of the space between the building and the street or adjacent lot line must be landscaped with ground cover plants and shrubs, and contain one tree per 400 square feet. All plants must be selected from the Portland Tree and Landscaping Manual. This standard applies to new development. Exterior walls of buildings designed to meet the requirements of this Paragraph must be at least 15 feet high measured from the finished sidewalk at the building’s edge.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2609  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2018, 11:22 PM
AdamUrbanist AdamUrbanist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 177
WTF? That is truly idiotic. We're talking about a park in the middle of downtown. Presumably a place where we want to encourage active uses like cafes that spill out onto the sidewalk. A 12 landscape buffer is just going to create awkward places for homeless people to camp.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2610  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 1:28 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,777
Quote:
Originally Posted by maccoinnich View Post
From the new zoning code:
The only thing I can think of where this would be applied would be the Postal building site, but even then, it makes no sense to have this kind of building language. The only benefit to setting a building back this much would allow room for outdoor seating for any potential restaurant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2611  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 3:29 AM
RED_PDXer RED_PDXer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 794
I can see the logic in the setback. Portland blocks are small and the park blocks are even more shallow. It's an attempt to increase the park-like setting beyond the park itself. There are some downsides to the small block sizes in Portland and one is the lack of broader open spaces downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2612  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 3:34 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
I've never understood why we don't reclaim the road space boarding the Park Blocks. We just need to look up a few blocks at PSU to realize how much more open and peaceful the park is without the roads.
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2613  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2018, 3:22 AM
RED_PDXer RED_PDXer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 794
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkDaMan View Post
I've never understood why we don't reclaim the road space boarding the Park Blocks. We just need to look up a few blocks at PSU to realize how much more open and peaceful the park is without the roads.
Tots. I work near PSU and the feeling of walking through the PSU park blocks is much more pleasant than the rest of them. A non-motorized park blocks would be fantastic!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2614  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2018, 6:11 AM
QAtheSky QAtheSky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 104


The two projects on NW Raleigh are moving along. Just waiting on the storage unit building construction to finish out the street grid and this area will be a half decent slice of the urban fabric.

As these get taller, along with the Vista tower nearby, the other vacant lots become wildly more conspicuous.

This area also desperately needs some ground floor retail activation. NW 13th North of Lovejoy gets unfriendly pretty much immediately with only the fake loading docs and parking garage entryways fronting to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2615  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2018, 6:37 AM
johnliu johnliu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 197
This area is coming along well!

Quote:
Originally Posted by QAtheSky View Post


The two projects on NW Raleigh are moving along. Just waiting on the storage unit building construction to finish out the street grid and this area will be a half decent slice of the urban fabric.

As these get taller, along with the Vista tower nearby, the other vacant lots become wildly more conspicuous.

This area also desperately needs some ground floor retail activation. NW 13th North of Lovejoy gets unfriendly pretty much immediately with only the fake loading docs and parking garage entryways fronting to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2616  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2018, 7:54 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,399
Posting Notice for 815 W Burnside
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2617  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2018, 12:47 AM
QAtheSky QAtheSky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by maccoinnich View Post
Posting Notice for 815 W Burnside


If they can wrap retail around from Burnside onto the Park Blocks successfully it would be a big step towards activating the area. This auto shop site and the Telecom building across the street do a great job of pretty much killing any gravitational pull from the Powell's intersection.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2618  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2018, 12:04 PM
johnliu johnliu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by QAtheSky View Post


If they can wrap retail around from Burnside onto the Park Blocks successfully it would be a big step towards activating the area. This auto shop site and the Telecom building across the street do a great job of pretty much killing any gravitational pull from the Powell's intersection.
Yes, that would be great.

However, W Burnside as an active street is hampered by the narrow sidewalk and heavy traffic. Hard to stroll comfortably with bus mirrors whizzing by your head and so much car noise that you can't hear your companions talk. To activate W Burnside, we'd need to widen the sidewalk, reduce traffic, add sidewalk seating. Which can't be done without a Burnside-Couch couplet. A ship which appears to have not sailed but been scuttled.

To really wrap around retail and activation, this building would use an arcade to widen and shelter the sidewalk, or include a retail-lined passage.

Interesting this is a IH project, only 7 stories, on expensive downtown land. I thought the development industry has been saying that IH prevents new projects unless they are 325' tall?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2619  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2018, 5:06 PM
AdamUrbanist AdamUrbanist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 177
Developers are clearly struggling to accommodate inclusionary housing. One strategy might be to make a project as large as possible to take advantage of economies of scale. Another may be to under-build the site with a less expensive building type. It will be interesting to watch what happens.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2620  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2018, 8:53 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,399
The narrow sidewalks on Burnside definitely make it an unpleasant street. This developement will likely be required to dedicate land to PBOT to create a 12’ or 15’ wide sidewalk.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:08 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.