Quote:
Originally Posted by SFSkyline
To each his own. I have no problem with the building itself, but I think the location is unfortunate. The view down the parkway from the museum is Philly's most iconic. You've gained this building but lost the view of Mellon and Liberty 1, which is the best of the bunch IMO. One block west, at 1900 Arch, would have been perfect. Oh well.
As for Salesforce Tower being a retread of other Pelli towers, he works with obelisks, so they'll all be somewhat alike. I find it interesting to see how the same basic shape can be made into so many different appearances. I urge people to look at the detail and quality of Salesforce's cladding compared to the others mentioned. It really is a different building.
|
I don't mind that this building is replacing the view of other buildings. That's the way a city should be. Can't not build a supertall for fear it will block views of something else. Plus, the 1900 block of Arch will have more buildings built on it in the future.
Salesforce is a very, very nice tower. However, it is a safe design. Most people will say it's a nice building. It fits perfectly within San Francisco, as most people will say they like the city.
CITC is a much more edgy design - it's something you would find in London. Some people may love it, some people may hate it... but that's what I like most about it. It's the perfect building for Philadelphia, as the city pretty much invokes that same exact response out of people. It's a work of art, and is forcing people to talk about it, no matter what opinion they have of it.
Not to mention the tower is very modern while including elements of Philadelphia manufacturing and industrial past - which is also a very great nod to the city.