HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #181  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2007, 8:31 AM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
^^^You gotta start somewhere, I say. As I recall, there was discussion that although the subway presently being planned would end in Chinatown, the tunnel could go as far as Washington Sq. It seems more likely that such a route could be extended around the northern edge of the city than building such a route from scratch in the absence of the Central Sunway now being planned. I also think that it wouldn't really need to be underground in North Beach and the Marina--it could surface near Washington Square and run as a surface LRV on Columbus, Northpoint, Bay and Marina Blvd.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #182  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2007, 2:14 AM
Richard Mlynarik Richard Mlynarik is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 168
Transbay design competition news
http://www.transbaycenter.org/TransB...nt.aspx?id=680
http://www.transbaycenter.org/TransB...rticipants.pdf

Rogers, Pelli, Calatrava, SOM in.
Foster out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #183  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2007, 8:11 PM
EastBayHardCore's Avatar
EastBayHardCore EastBayHardCore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Inner Sunset
Posts: 5,047
From Engadget:

Article - http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/10/m...d-in-flight-e/
TONS of pics here - http://www.engadget.com/photos/mega-...entertainment/

Mega hands-on: Virgin America's Airbus A320 with Red in-flight entertainment

Not-yet-airborne Virgin America invited us to check out the way-decked Airbus A320 with Red prototype in-flight entertainment system that's parked at SFO right now. (Naw, we didn't get to take it up, the US Dept. of Transportation hasn't yet cleared VA for commercial flights yet, boo.) They definitely weren't kidding when they said it's got it all: movies on demand, pervasive music playlists, in-seat messaging with a QWERTY controller, touchscreen Linux consoles with games, the works. We've got a massive, massive gallery for you to check out (it's really not to be missed); we toured the aft cargo area where the each plane's servers live, the Red in-seat consoles (of course), the cockpit, even WiFi-enabled flight attendant handhelds. We've also got a full rundown of everything you need to know about Virgin America, Red, and the kitted-out Airbus, so check out the gallery below, and click on for more details about the only airline we officially sanction as being geeked enough to transport Engadget.


Seatback consoles

* Linux-based with Tiny X
* VA developed Red in-flight interface
* 9-inch integrated touchscreen
* 1024 x 600 resolution (oh, so close to HD! but not quite)
* Dual internal flash drives for redundant storage of embedded OS

Niceties that melt our hearts

* One USB port and one ethernet port per seat
* USB can be used with a portable keyboard on seatback console (or to charge your device)
* Ethernet hooks you into a LAN with the rest of the passengers
* Two 110v outlets per 3-seat row (and one per seat in first class)
* Dual 802.11b WiFi access points in cabin (fore and aft)
* Sprint EV-DO uplink (for ground communications)
* Yet-unannounced in-air broadband uplink
* LED mood lighting throughout the craft

Communications

* Send email and SMS messages from your seat console
* In-cabin chats, either private (one on one), group (by invite), or common (whole plane)
* Dedicated chat rooms for each channel to discuss what's on TV
* Send food and beverage orders (and pay) directly from your console
* Galley inventory lists are transmitted wirelessly when the plane is stocked; customers are prompted when their order cannot be fulfilled due to no remaining inventory

Entertainment

* Streaming pay-per-view movies from on-board media server
* Over 3,000 MP3 tunes stored in on-board media server; persistent play lists (i.e. the playlist you make online or in your seat will follow you to future flights)
* Dish live TV with in-flight program guide
* Games! Open source titles (including Doom); VA will host an open source game dev competition, the best games will be added to the playable titles list.

Gear and servers

* One system controller
* Three Dish receiver / tuner boxes
* Three redundant storage arrays for streaming audio and video -- during flight data (including CC transactions) is written only to encrypted flash

Etc.

* Flight attendants can monitor traffic spikes from bandwidth-greedy users
* Seats 149 passengers (eight in first class)
* Lavatories have their own soundtrack, kind of like those chic hotels
* Prices should be "competitive" with some budget airlines
* Expected to take flight this summer (US Dept. of Transportation approval pending)
__________________
"This will not be known as the Times Square of the West," City Council President Alex Padilla declared last week. "Times Square will be known as the L.A. Live of the East."

Will Rogers once said, "children in San Francisco are taught two things: love the Lord and hate Los Angeles."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #184  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2007, 7:52 PM
EastBayHardCore's Avatar
EastBayHardCore EastBayHardCore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Inner Sunset
Posts: 5,047
Published Tuesday, February 6, 2007, in the San Francisco Chronicle

Prestigious cruise liner whets port's appetite

By David Armstrong

The mega-cruise ship Queen Mary 2 left more than starry-eyed
sightseers in the wake of its stay in San Francisco on Monday. It
left thoughts of what could be if the Port of San Francisco firmly
establishes its up-and-down cruise ship business and finally builds
a long-discussed passenger cruise terminal to replace its antiquated
facilities.

The passengers and crew of the Queen Mary 2, launched three years ago
by the storied Cunard Lines, spent an estimated $1.2 million in the
big vessel's 1 1/2-day call in San Francisco, its first visit ever.

According to Gerry Roybal of the port's maritime division, on-shore
restaurant meals, gifts, taxis, money spent servicing the vessel and
close to $100,000 in state and local taxes combine to make up a near
million-dollar-a-day revenue stream.

Roybal said having the Queen Mary 2 at dockside was "a great
experience and opportunity for us. Because of its high profile, it
puts San Francisco on the world map for being a full-service cruise
port."

Additionally, Roybal said, the port call helps San Francisco
strengthen its long-term relationship with Cunard, a sister company
of Princess, a major cruise line with which the port regularly does
business.

This may be especially important in the near term, as Princess will
reposition one of its ships, the Dawn Princess, to San Diego from
San Francisco this year to serve the market for cruises to Mexico.

As a result, Roybal said, the number of San Francisco's cruise ship
visitors is expected to dip to 190,000 to 200,000 this year before
returning to 230,000 to 250,000 -- where it has hovered in recent
years -- when two refurbished vessels are made available by Princess
in 2008.

Port calls by visiting ships, which totaled a robust 81 last year,
will dip to 59 in 2007, making it a down year -- especially after
all the hoopla around the Queen Mary 2.

The Queen Mary 2 dropped anchor at Pier 27, a finger pier that the
port is using to supplement its main -- but outdated -- passenger
cruise terminal at Pier 35, another old finger pier.

Industry watchers think the port's cruise ship business could go up
dramatically should the city finally succeed in a decadelong quest
to replace its antiquated facilities.

The city is still determined to upgrade its cruise ship offerings with
a new terminal, said Mayor Gavin Newsom, who officially welcomed the
Queen Mary 2 to San Francisco at a ceremony aboard the ship Monday.

"We had a proposal in place to build at Piers 30 and 32, but we had a
setback with the developer," Newsom said, referring to a partnership
between Australia's Lend Lease Corp. and the Port of Singapore, which
backed out af a plan last year. "Part of the funding component was
adjacent office space, but the market for office space changed."

"The facilities we have now are not world class," Newsom said. "We
remain committed."

According to Roybal, the aborted plan -- which called for a
combination passenger cruise terminal, condominiums, retail and office
space at the site south of the Bay Bridge -- could well be replaced
later this year by a plan to build a simplified, stripped-down
terminal complex somewhere on port-owned waterfront property.

A task force, which recently met for the first time and hopes to issue
a recommendation to port officials by late summer, is re-examining the
cruise terminal issue, Roybal said.

Composed of representatives from the hotel and restaurant industries,
the San Francisco Convention & Visitors Bureau, the San Francisco
Chamber of Commerce and other travel trade players, the task force
could recommend another site for a terminal and theoretically could
even recommend that no terminal be built, he said.
__________________
"This will not be known as the Times Square of the West," City Council President Alex Padilla declared last week. "Times Square will be known as the L.A. Live of the East."

Will Rogers once said, "children in San Francisco are taught two things: love the Lord and hate Los Angeles."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #185  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2007, 9:23 PM
rs913's Avatar
rs913 rs913 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,302
Quote:
Article - http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/10/m...d-in-flight-e/
TONS of pics here - http://www.engadget.com/photos/mega-...entertainment/

Mega hands-on: Virgin America's Airbus A320 with Red in-flight entertainment
Now that does look impressive. It remains to be seen whether all these functions will work smoothly as advertised...there are lots of complaints that some of the more modern IFE systems crash a lot. But if they can pull it off, Virgin America might actually be able to command a price premium as a result of having IFE that's way ahead of every other airline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #186  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2007, 9:31 PM
ltsmotorsport's Avatar
ltsmotorsport ltsmotorsport is offline
Here we stAy
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Parkway Pauper
Posts: 8,064
Work to begin on Folsom span

Bridge near dam will ease congested commutes in city.
By Tony Bizjak and Cathy Locke - Bee Staff Writers
Last Updated 8:39 am PST Thursday, February 22, 2007
Story appeared in MAIN NEWS section, Page A1


For Folsom's beleaguered commuters, there's finally a concrete reason for hope.

Today, federal and local officials, including Reps. John Doolittle and Dan Lungren, will break ground on a hillside near Folsom Dam, starting construction on a new $117 million bridge.

For residents and commuters, the four-lane bridge and a new, 2-mile connector road can't come too soon. Folsom, a commute crossroads between El Dorado and Placer counties, has suffered some of the region's worst "cut through" traffic congestion on its residential streets for three years.

The trigger was a federal decision in 2003 to close the road atop Folsom Dam for safety reasons, following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Federal officials determined that public vehicles on the dam made it vulnerable to terrorist attack. The new bridge, which is more than 100 yards from the dam, won federal support and financing as the alternative route.

Although work on the bridge is not expected to begin for several weeks, the project already is being hailed as a unique accomplishment in the typically slow-moving world of road building.

"This moved along with the speed of light," Mayor Andy Morin said. "It's amazing to think that in a year and a half, and maybe a few months, we'll be cutting a ribbon."

The project has moved so fast that they haven't named the bridge yet.

"We're just calling it the new Folsom bridge for now," city spokeswoman Sue Ryan said. "Maybe by the time we finish we'll have one."

Closure of Folsom Dam road rerouted an estimated 18,000 vehicles a day to three nearby spans -- Rainbow Bridge, Lake Natoma Crossing and the Hazel Avenue bridge.

It also provided disquieting evidence in the growing foothills of the thin edge separating regularly flowing traffic and gridlock.

Some commuters reported half-hour increases in daily drives to work, and a survey last year found Folsom residents considered closure-induced congestion the worst problem in town.

Builders with the Army Corps of Engineers say they hope to open the new bridge by December 2008.

"The pressure's on," said Creg Hucks, Army Corps project manager. "That's an aggressive schedule."

The 1,000-foot span -- described architecturally as clean and functional -- will stand 200 feet above the American River, will carry four car lanes, and will include bicycle lanes and a pedestrian walkway.

It will connect Folsom-Auburn Road on the west with East Natoma Street on the east.

If workers meet the 2008 finish date, Hucks said, the bridge will have been built just five years after it was conceived.

By comparison, nearby Lake Natoma Crossing, built in 1999, took a more typical 10 years from conception to completion.

"There was much more of an environmental impact with Lake Natoma," Mayor Morin said. Unlike the new bridge, which will run through a remote government-owned area, the Lake Natoma bridge neighbors a residential area and the city's historic district.

For the new Folsom bridge, City Council members traveled to Washington, D.C., at least three times a year for several years to lobby for federal support and money, Morin said.

Most of the estimated $117 million cost will be funded by the federal government, but the city of Folsom and the state kicked in $28 million for the project, including funds from Measure A, the state Department of Water Resources and the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency.

Morin said there should be relatively few traffic disruptions during construction because the project does not involve major work on existing roads.

El Dorado Hills resident Louie Kiser said he's amazed at the project's speed.

Kiser used to travel on Folsom Dam Road to his job in Auburn. The road closure added 10 to 15 minutes to his afternoon drive, even though he commutes at off-peak hours.

Kiser , 59, figured he'd be retired by the time the new bridge was built. Now, he says, "I'll have to hang on a little longer to commute over the new bridge."

Business owners in Folsom have lamented the closure of the old, dam-top road. Commuters streamed through town, clogging residential and commercial streets, and causing some shoppers to stay away from Folsom businesses.

Dan Friedman has owned Folsom Dam Auto Repair on Folsom-Auburn Road for 12 years.

"It's been a huge imposition to people in this area and the east end of Folsom and El Dorado Hills," he said.

Friedman said he's not sure his repair shop will be around to reap the benefits of the new bridge. He estimated his business has dropped more than 40 percent since the old road closed. Customers from El Dorado Hills told him they weren't willing to fight heavy traffic on Highway 50 and Folsom-Auburn Road to reach his business once they lost the relatively convenient dam road.

He faces the same challenge, Friedman said. A round trip to purchase auto parts at Folsom businesses near Highway 50 can take two hours in the middle of the afternoon, he said.

He worries about inconvenience during construction but crosses his fingers for the end product.

"I'm hoping the bridge will make life a lot easier for many people in El Dorado Hills," he said.




Construction is expected to start in a few weeks on a
new bridge over the American River, shown here
in a photo-simulated rendering, to replace
Folsom Dam Road, which was closed to the
public in 2003.
__________________
Riding out the crazy train

Last edited by ltsmotorsport; Feb 22, 2007 at 9:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #187  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2007, 4:02 PM
Reminiscence's Avatar
Reminiscence Reminiscence is offline
Green Berniecrat
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond/Eureka, CA
Posts: 1,689


- BAY AREA -

Transit proposal increased, $500 million more for regional upgrades

Michael Cabanatuan, Chronicle Staff Writer

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

The Bay Area fares about $500 million better in a revised list of highway improvements recommended to receive funding through the state's transportation bonds.

A new recommendation released Monday by staff members at the California Transportation Commission adds six projects -- all carpool lanes or merging lanes. It increases the amount that would be spent in the nine-county Bay Area to $1.1 billion from an initial recommendation of $686 million.

"We clearly have come some distance in the last week," said Randy Rentschler, spokesman for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the regional transportation planning and financing agency. "The Bay Area's list is a lot better, but we're hopeful that the ... commissioners are not finished yet."

Commissioner Jeremiah Hallisey hopes so, too. He said he will push to get funding for widening the Novato Narrows, reconfiguring the Interstate 580/Highway 101 interchange in San Rafael, and improving Doyle Drive in San Francisco.

"There are still some adjustments that need to be made, and I am prepared to do that," he said.

Bay Area officials are also lobbying to add a westbound carpool lane from Greenville Road to Foothill Road on often-gridlocked I-580.

The commission will decide Wednesday which projects to fund when it meets in Irvine. It has until March 1 to allot $4.5 billion in bond money to improve traffic flow on freeways and highways. Of that amount, $1.8 billion is set aside for Northern California projects. The new recommendation drops a proposal to allot just $2.8 billion this year and the rest in 2008.

The revised list from the commission's staff suggests funding the following Bay Area projects that had been left off the list:

-- Carpool lanes from Highway 237 to Highway 101 in Santa Clara County;

-- Carpool lanes on Interstate 80 from the I-80/Interstate 680/Highway 12 interchange to Putah Creek in Solano County;

-- Merging lanes on Highway 101 from the Embarcadero to Marsh Road in San Mateo County;

-- A southbound carpool lane on Interstate 880 from Marina Road to Hegenberger Road in Alameda County;

-- A westbound carpool lane on I-580 through the Highway 84 interchange;

-- Merging lanes on Highway 101 from the Embarcadero to Highway 85 in Santa Clara County.

Bay Area projects still on the list include a fourth bore for the Caldecott Tunnel, widening of Highway 4 between Somersville Road and Highway 160, widening of Jameson Canyon Road (Highway 12) in Napa and Solano counties, carpool lanes on Highway 101 in Sonoma County, and an eastbound carpool lane from Hacienda Road to Greenville Road in Alameda County.

The list of recommendations still doesn't recommend funding a new San Francisco approach to the Golden Gate Bridge on Doyle Drive, westbound carpool lanes on I-580, the I-80/I-680/Highway 12 interchange in Cordelia or a widening of the Novato Narrows on Highway 101 in Marin and Sonoma counties.

But $4.5 billion doesn't go far in a state that has neglected its infrastructure for decades, said John Barna, executive director of the state Transportation Commission. He suggested the Doyle Drive project could be funded from a Caltrans account devoted to safety projects.

"There are a lot of good projects here that we would like to see funded," Barna said. "But we are too financially constrained to fund them."
Transportation bond projects

Highway 101

-- Wilfred Ave-Santa Rosa Ave., Santa Rosa

-- Steele Lane-Windsor River, Santa Rosa

-- Railroad Ave.-Rohnert Park Expressway, Rohnert Park

-- Merging lanes, Embarcadero-Marsh Rd., San Mateo

-- Widening, Yerba Buena, between I-280 and I-680, Santa Clara

-- Merging lanes, between Hwy. 85 to Embarcadero, Mountain View

Interstate 80

-- HOV lanes for Routes I-80/I-680/12 to Putah Creek, Fairfield

-- Freeway-local road work from Carquinez-Bay Bridge to Bay Bridge

Interstate 580

-- HOV lane, Hacienda to Greenville, Castro Valley

-- Westbound HOV lane, Isabel (Rte. 84) interchange, Livermore

Interstate 880

-- Southbound HOV lane, Marina-Hegenberger, San Leandro

-- Southbound HOV extension, Hwy. 237 to I-101

Highway 24

-- Caldecott Tunnel, fourth bore

Highway 12

-- Jameson Canyon widening, American Canyon

Highway 4

-- Widening, Somersville Rd. to Hwy. 160

Sources: ESRI, TeleAtlas
__________________
Reject the lesser evil and fight for the greater good like our lives depend on it, because they do!
-- Dr. Jill Stein, 2016 Green Party Presidential Candidate
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #188  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2007, 3:59 AM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,979
"Top Priority" Freeway on Funding Backburner
Dan Adams, KXTV News10 Reporter

When voters overwhelming passed Proposition 1B last November, earmarking $4.5 billion to improve California's roadways, they did so based with on belief the money would be spent on the highways that are most congested. The campaign in favor of 1B even featured advertisements profiling some of those roads that are among the worst in the state.

In the Sacramento-Bay Area, the Solano County interchange where Iinterstate 80, Interstate 680 and Highway 12 intersect was held up as a "poster child" representing the region's most pressing transportation needs. But when the California Transportation Commission (CTC) meets on Wednesday to dole out the money, only a small fraction of what is needed to improve traffic flow at 80/680 is expected to be granted.

"Our view was this project would be one of the first ones funded. Not one of the last," said Solano Transportation Authority Executive Director Daryl Halls. "We asked for $150 million which we thought was a very reasonable investment."

The CTC staff recommendation for 80/680 was, in fact, substantially less --$56 million -- and that money would be spent to merely add a carpool lane.

For the 200,000 motorists who daily traverse the maze of on-ramps and off-ramps and at times just stop on the eight-lane freeway because there is too much traffic, the idea that they supported Proposition 1B only to be shunned is not sitting well.

"I don't think it was the best spending of my tax dollars," said Jacob Tyree on Vacaville. The construction worker who commutes to Concord said sometimes it takes 45 minutes to go 10 miles. "It's gridlock. You can't go anywhere. You can't do anything."

CTC is expected to approve $95 million to widen Highway 12 through Jameson Canyon, the two-lane bottleneck between Fairfield and Napa that regularly backs up for miles. But $94 million needed for a new 80/680 interchange is not on the list of approved projects.

Supporters of the interchange improvement say it would be particularly important in the next few years. Later this year the new Benicia Bridge is scheduled to open. It will allow more traffic to flow northbound on I-680. creating even greater congestion where 680 connects with 80.

Wednesday morning in Orange County, CTC will listen to last-minute pleas and then make its final decision. Representatives from Solano County will be there asking the CTC to reconsider funding for 80/680.
__________________
“The best friend on earth of man is the tree. When we use the tree respectfully and economically, we have one of the greatest resources on the earth.” – Frank Lloyd Wright
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #189  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2007, 5:51 AM
kenratboy kenratboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 1,096
I like the central subway plan for SF - but only if it is part of a grand master plan that will actually be built.

It should also tie into the Powell Street BART station, that would be awesome! My gut feeling is a lot of people would just want to go to that area (for shopping/tourism) and wouldn't mind paying a dollar or so for

Maybe have a station at the Powell Street station, one at the north corner of Union Square (I know its close (1/5 mile!?), but it is a popular area and could be nice), then have the last station in Chinatown.

Ultimately, extend that sucker further and further north and west, maybe to the Presidio (now I am just dreaming!)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #190  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2007, 9:28 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,979
Capitol Corridor continues growth trend...

Amtrak ridership, revenue steams ahead
Sacramento Business Journal -
10:13 AM PST Thursday, March 1, 2007


The increase in riders and ticket revenue for Amtrak's
California routes helped propel the railroad's first-quarter
ridership up 4 percent nationwide.

For the four months ended Jan. 30, the Capitol Corridor
Service posted one of the railroad's few double-digit increases
in both riders and ticket revenue. The number of passengers
on the San Jose-San Francisco/Oakland-Sacramento-Auburn
train increased 11 percent to 465,000 compared to the same
period in the previous year. Ticket revenue increased more
than 18 percent to $5.7 million.


Ticket revenue also increased on the San Joaquin Service,
despite train cancellations due to track improvements that
reduced ridership 1 percent. The San Francisco/Oakland-Bakersfield
train had 254,000 passengers and ticket revenue of $1.7
million, a 3 percent increase over the previous year.

California's three corridor Amtrak services -- The Pacific
Surfliner Service, the Capitol Corridor Service and
the San Joaquin Service -- all rank in the top 10 in
Amtrak ridership nationwide.
The Amtrak services
in California are operated under contracts with the
California Department of Transportation.

Overall ridership for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 is
up 4 percent to 8.2 million passengers across Amtrak's
46-state network.
__________________
“The best friend on earth of man is the tree. When we use the tree respectfully and economically, we have one of the greatest resources on the earth.” – Frank Lloyd Wright
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #191  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2007, 12:48 AM
Reminiscence's Avatar
Reminiscence Reminiscence is offline
Green Berniecrat
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond/Eureka, CA
Posts: 1,689
Some new plans for the J-Church line ...

Muni vows to improve lagging J-Church line

Rachel Gordon, Chronicle Staff Writer

Thursday, March 1, 2007

- SAN FRANCISCO -

The city's worst streetcar line when it comes to keeping on schedule will get extra attention from city officials who vow to boost on-time performance, Mayor Gavin Newsom told The Chronicle today.

The J-Church, which runs between Balboa Park and the Embarcadero, is on time just 61.9 percent of the time, the most dismal rate among all Metro lines.

Starting Monday, the Municipal Transportation Agency, which operates San Francisco's public transit system, will make a concerted effort to improve service on the J-Church, Newsom said.

That means the line will be fully staffed to assure that no scheduled runs are missed, parking control officers will be deployed to make sure the tracks aren't blocked by trucks and cars, and the traffic signals may be retimed to keep the streetcars moving.

The pilot project is expected to last 120 days.

It will be modeled after another trial that looked to improve service on the 1-California. That 3-month project, which ended last month, resulted in an 88 percent on-time performance rate, up from 81 percent. The cost of the 1-California enhancement program was $168,000 over 90 days. Officials didn't know how much the J-Church initiative will cost.
__________________
Reject the lesser evil and fight for the greater good like our lives depend on it, because they do!
-- Dr. Jill Stein, 2016 Green Party Presidential Candidate
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #192  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2007, 9:25 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,979
2nd air carrier inaugurates service from SMF to Mexico

Frontier starts Los Cabos flights from Sacramento
Sacramento Business Journal - 11:44 AM PST
Friday, March 2, 2007

Frontier Airlines on Saturday will start its three times
per week non-stop flights from Sacramento International
Airport to Los Cabos, Mexico.

The Denver-based airline will offer 7:25 a.m. departures
Tuesdays and Thursdays, and a 2:40 p.m. flight on
Saturdays from Sacramento to Los Cabos. The return
flights from Los Cabos are 12:10 p.m. Tuesdays and
Thursdays, and an 11:40 a.m. Saturday flight.


Frontier has Airbus A319 jets for the service, with
24 channels of DIRECTV and pay-per-view movies in every seat.

City officials and community leaders will hold a
ribbon-cutting ceremony 2 p.m. Saturday for the first
flight that connects the state's capital to the resort
town of Los Cabos.

San Jose also will start non-stop service to Los Cabos,
with four flights per week scheduled
__________________
“The best friend on earth of man is the tree. When we use the tree respectfully and economically, we have one of the greatest resources on the earth.” – Frank Lloyd Wright
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #193  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2007, 6:03 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
Yeah, yeah--we all prefer transit to roads. But sometimes ya gotta drive and the areas commerce depends on its road system, so here's the first installment on the "transportation bonds" we passed:



Quote:
Battle for highway funds paid off
Applying pressure: Heavy politicking and strategic planning got the Bay Area most of what it needed to relieve congestion

Michael Cabanatuan, Greg Lucas, Chronicle Staff Writers
Sunday, March 4, 2007

When California voters passed Proposition 1B in November, they set off a scramble by cities, counties and transportation agencies to grab as much of the $20 billion in bond revenues as they could.

The scramble continued until early Wednesday afternoon, when the California Transportation Commission handed out $4.5 billion for highway projects in the first big bond revenue payout.

The Bay Area captured most of what it wanted thanks to aggressive lobbying that secured nearly $2 billion for projects like widening the Novato Narrows, building carpool lanes on Interstates 80 and 580 and Highway 101 and a fourth bore for the Caldecott Tunnel.

The fight for funds began well before Wednesday, as commission staffers hunkered down at Caltrans headquarters a month ago to sort through $11.3 billion in proposed projects.

Their job: Winnow the projects down to $4.5 billion -- $1.8 billion for Northern California and $2.7 billion for Southern California.

"They had 30 days,'' said commission Vice Chairman Jim Ghielmetti. "It was really difficult for staff to go through all those, compare them and come up with a list.''

While the state's population, number of registered vehicles and volume of traffic soared during the past two decades, transportation funding stagnated, leaving all 58 counties with long lists of projects they wanted to build.

"My ear's still warm from talking to all of you,'' Ghielmetti said Wednesday to the 250 transportation officials, politicians, lobbyists and others assembled for the meeting in Irvine.

Less than two weeks earlier, on Feb. 16, the commission's staff had recommended handing out $2.7 billion this year and waiting until 2008 to hand out the rest after getting more information to compare projects.

The problem, commissioners and transportation officials said, is the recommendations omitted some of the biggest projects in the Bay Area and Los Angeles.

They also proposed spending some of the money on rural highway projects such as the $177 million Willits Bypass in Mendocino County, which infuriated officials in congested urban areas.

"With the initial list, the commission staff managed to infuriate leadership from the two most powerful regions of the state. One of those regions has the leader of the Senate and the other has the leader of the Assembly," said Jim Wunderman, executive director of the Bay Area Council, a business group that lobbied on behalf of regional projects. "By doing that, the commission (staff) created an environment which guaranteed what they proposed wasn't going to be what happened."

Calls from elected officials started almost as soon as the list was out, said Bay Area commissioners Ghielmetti and Jeremiah Hallisey.

"When that (initial funding list) hit the street, a lot of legislators were very upset,'' Ghielmetti said.

At a Feb. 20 public hearing, while county transportation officials pleaded with commissioners to fund their projects, the governor weighed in.

About an hour into the afternoon meeting, Hallisey received on his Blackberry an e-mail from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger urging the commission to fund several high-profile projects -- including, in the Bay Area, a westbound carpool lane on I-580 through the Tri-Valley area and the Doyle Drive approach to the Golden Gate Bridge.

"He sent a letter to the commission in the middle of a meeting,'' Hallisey said. "That certainly had an impact.''

Aaron McLear, Schwarzenegger's press secretary, said the governor "saw the initial list, and like all other stakeholders, he thought it was important he should put out what he thought should be on the list. Obviously he's pleased."

After that, transportation officials said, the lobbying picked up.

"Virtually every Assembly member or senator in the Bay Area called, sent a letter or an e-mail or both,'' Hallisey said.

So did local authorities, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, business groups like the Bay Area Council and Silicon Valley Leadership Group and lobbyists for highway builders.

"MTC was calling me three times a day,'' Hallisey said.

Randy Rentschler, the commission's spokesman, said the agency had a strategy to present a single message from the region.

"We didn't want people from nine counties all calling, pushing their own projects,'' he said, "and we don't think the commissioners did either. Our pitch was to have a unified position centered around congestion relief and then centered around a number."

That number was $1.5 billion -- 85 percent of the money available for Northern California.

"What we tried to do was put projects before them that would get them close to that number by picking and choosing Bay Area projects," Rentschler said. "And it was very important to have some geographic diversity so that no county would get zero.''

It worked.

The Bay Area received more than $1.3 billion in funds for projects scattered around the region -- including the I-580 carpool lane, widening of the Novato Narrows and merging lanes at the interchange of I-580 and Highway 101 in San Rafael. Those projects were not on the initial list the Caltrans staff put together.

Still, it took hard work to secure $405 million for Doyle Drive, Rentschler said.

With help from state Sen. Carole Migden, D-San Francisco, and Stuart Sunshine, chief of staff to San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission persuaded Caltrans Director Will Kempton, and then the commission, to commit the money from a separate Caltrans account.

That deal was completed the night before the meeting, sources said, and officials in Sacramento called those Bay Area officials at a pre-meeting cocktail reception to let them know.

The region didn't get everything. The most noticeable absence was rebuilding the Cordelia Junction interchange of Interstates 80 and 680 in Solano County. Still, few are complaining.

"When all is said and done, we did very well,'' Rentschler said. "We're very grateful.''

Prop. 1B projects
The California Transportation Commission approved a list of Bay Area projects that will receive $1.4 billion in funding from voter-approved bonds. Here are the projects that will be built with the money.


Hwy. 101

1 HOV lanes and ramp work from Windsor River Rd., Windsor, to Steele Ln., Santa Rosa

2 HOV lanes from Santa Rosa Ave., Sonoma County, to Wilfred Ave., Rohnert Park

3 HOV lanes from Rohnert Park Expy., Rohnert Park, to Railroad Ave., Sonoma County

4 Widen Novato Narrows from Petaluma River bridge, Petaluma, to Atherton Ave., Novato

5 Build merging lanes at I-580 in San Rafael

6 Build merging lanes from Marsh Rd., Menlo Park, to Embarcadero Rd., Palo Alto

7 Widening from I-280/I-680 to Yerba Buena Rd., San Jose.

8 Build merging lanes from Embarcadero Rd., Palo Alto, to Hwy. 85, Mountain View


I-80

9 HOV lanes from I-680/Hwy.12, Fairfield, to Putah South Canal, Vacaville

10 Freeway-local road work from Carquinez Bridge to Bay Bridge


I-580

11 Eastbound HOV lane from Hacienda Dr., Pleasanton, to Greenville Rd., Livermore

12 Westbound HOV lane from Foothill Rd., Dublin, to Greenville Rd., Livermore

13 Westbound HOV interchange lane at Hwy. 84


I-880

14 Southbound HOV lane from Hegenberger Rd., Oakland, to Marina Blvd., San Leandro

15 Southbound HOV lane between Hwys. 237 to 101


Hwy. 24

16 Caldecott Tunnel, fourth bore


Hwy. 12

17 Widen Jameson Canyon Rd. through American Canyon


Hwy. 4

18 Widen from Somersville Rd., Antioch, to Hwy. 160, Oakley

E-mail the writers at mcabanatuan@sfchronicle.com and glucas@sfchronicle.com.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...AGPHOF7B61.DTL
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #194  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2007, 6:11 PM
kenratboy kenratboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 1,096
Well, if we are not willing to build a decent mass transit system, we might as well have good roads :p

I think of these projects not as something new, but as something that is past-due and that we are playing catch-up with. Like you said, there are a lot of parts of the Bay Area where cars are still the rule, and will be for the foreseeable future.

#16 is what I really find interesting, hope that works out well. I grew up in the East Bay and remember the bottleneck and issues the tunnel caused.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #195  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2007, 8:39 PM
Richard Mlynarik Richard Mlynarik is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenratboy View Post
Well, if we are not willing to build a decent mass transit system, we might as well have good roads :p
Pick one. Arnold "CO2 Emissions" has gone 100% for roads.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenratboy View Post
#16 is what I really find interesting, hope that works out well. I grew up in the East Bay and remember the bottleneck and issues the tunnel caused.
The Caldecott Tunnel has by far the worst cost-effectiveness of any project. Not only is it only "needed" to allow Rockridge housewives to go shopping in Walnut Creek during peak commute hours, but the BART tunnel which runs directly alongside and parallel to it run ten car trains ALMOST COMPLETELY EMPTY every 15 minutes.

This is pure, unadulterated, anti-environmental, industry-welfare pork.

There is simply no hope for California or this country -- and that means very bad things for the rest of the world.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #196  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2007, 10:01 PM
kenratboy kenratboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 1,096
Well at least they have picked something, instead of NEITHER, while the population of California continues to explode (not saying that roads are better, just that transit needs to expand with the population!)

California has about 38,000,000 people right now, that takes some serious infrastructure.

I say all this because I love the state and I would hate to see the economy stunted by such preventable problems.

As for your BART statement, when my dad used to commute from Concord to SF, he was lucky to get a seat, let alone the trains being empty - there was even issues as the stations to the east got more riders (population boom out there), the trains were arriving in Concord (let alone further west), packed. Where are you getting this? And the environment will die with the 4th bore The government already let ugly ass tract homes cover the once-beautiful golden hill when there is so much room for infill, I'm sure the 4th bore will be fine in comparison. How is it that the older developments in Moraga, Orinda, and those areas still look pretty (lots of natural vegetation, roads follow the contours of the hills, etc.), but the new stuff was just 'painted on'?

We obviously have differing opinions...except that we both realize and admit things certainly are screwed up
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #197  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2007, 10:49 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Mlynarik View Post
Pick one. Arnold "CO2 Emissions" has gone 100% for roads.


Keep in mind that the total bond issue is $20 billion. These projects just represent an initial tranch of $4.5 billion that I think was intended to target only road projects that have long been planned. There's another $15.5 billion to be divied up and I would hope a reasonable amount of that will go to transit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #198  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2007, 10:57 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Mlynarik View Post
The Caldecott Tunnel has by far the worst cost-effectiveness of any project. Not only is it only "needed" to allow Rockridge housewives to go shopping in Walnut Creek during peak commute hours, but the BART tunnel which runs directly alongside and parallel to it run ten car trains ALMOST COMPLETELY EMPTY every 15 minutes.

This is pure, unadulterated, anti-environmental, industry-welfare pork.
The hyperbole of most of your comments diminishes their effectiveness. Anyone who has been on this road during the evening commute can tell you that not only is more capacity needed (yes, they already have 2 "bores" in the direction of the commute but the lane switching still backs up traffic badly) but all the exhaust from all those creeping cars must create a lot of pullution. This is not some new idea. It was being talked about when I worked in Concord in the '90's. And not everybody crossing the Oakland Hills can really utilize BART (whose East Bay parking lots are full and whose trains are packed).

Finally, like I said, roads may not be the ideal way to move people around but they are still essential to commerce. Your neighborhood Safeway cannot be re-stocked via BART.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #199  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2007, 3:54 AM
mthd mthd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Mlynarik View Post
The Caldecott Tunnel has by far the worst cost-effectiveness of any project.
if you are going to make such definitive statements, it would be nice to see some facts to support it...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #200  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2007, 4:06 AM
kenratboy kenratboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 1,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by mthd View Post
if you are going to make such definitive statements, it would be nice to see some facts to support it...
I seriously doubt he cares about facts, just principle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:58 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.