HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #641  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2009, 7:16 AM
Formula7's Avatar
Formula7 Formula7 is offline
Future 'Scraper Maker
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 14
1st post

I figured this thread hasn't seen much action in a bit and my registration finally got approved, so, I figured I'd let this be my first pot. Seeing as my hope is to live in the Railyards after they get finished as long as the movement doesn't come to a halt.

Here we go!

THIS WEEK AT THE RAILYARDS
(Week of July 20, 2009):

•On July 23, 2009, Congresswoman Doris Matsui secured $41 million dollars for Sacramento area transportation projects. The appropriations bill passed Thursday by the U.S. House of Representatives in part provides $750,000 for the Sacramento Intermodal Transportation Facility rail line relocation project. The improvements will allow for increased capacity for both freight trains, passenger service, and regional rail service.
•Mayor Kevin Johnson presented a Railyards case study at the Mayor's Institute on City Design in Denver, Colorado on Thursday, July 23, 2009. This national forum will discuss the transportation component of the largest infill development project in the U.S.
•SACOG named the Sacramento Intermodal Transportation Facility – Phase Two at The Railyards as its top priority in its recommendation to Caltrans for a $30 million award under ARRA and U.S. Department of Transportation’s Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) federal stimulus grant program. Grant applications are due September 15, 2009 and awards will be announced in February, 2010.
•The Railyards was awarded $30.9 million by the State HCD Loan and Grant Committee from Prop 1C grant funds. READ MORE
•Infrastructure design work continues.

http://sacramentorailyards.com/home/home.htm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #642  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2009, 11:30 PM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,079
Friday, July 31, 2009

SHRA awaits budget fallout
Fate of projects including The Railyards and Township 9 uncertain
Sacramento Business Journal
http://sacramento.bizjournals.com/sa...03/story5.html



The Railyards project, north of downtown, is expected to receive $50 million in redevelopment funds. The status of those funds is unknown in light of the state’s budget revisions.

The Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency believes state actions to use some of its funds to balance the budget are unconstitutional, the agency said this week, and would support a lawsuit on its behalf by the California Redevelopment Association.

The statewide association has yet to file such a claim and could not be reached for comment.

SHRA’s directors are evaluating the impact of an estimated $26 million loss in 2010 due to the state action. The action could potentially derail — at least temporarily — The Railyards and other large projects that will depend on redevelopment funding to move forward.

“In general, we will not be able to initiate any new activities and we are trying to protect existing, approved projects,” Lisa Bates, SHRA deputy director, wrote in an e-mail. “A number of projects in the planning stage that would have resulted in job creation and infusion of private capital may not be able to move forward or will be substantially delayed.”

That can have a serious impact on the local economy. The agency has determined that every $1 of public funds it spends draws $6.20 in private investment. Bates said a $26 million loss means the region stands to lose what equates to about 1,500 jobs.

In the past, California has borrowed property taxes from cities, counties and redevelopment authorities to balance its budget and usually transfers the funds in May.

Some of Sacramento’s largest projects, such as The Railyards and Township 9, rely on tax-increment financing, a method that redirects property taxes in certain geographic areas for use as redevelopment funds. Officials say the agency’s ability to use those funds is now “seriously impaired.” Sacramento often uses redevelopment funds as the “local match” when receiving state bond funds, so the ability to claim that money also is in question.

According to SHRA, The Railyards is expected to receive as much as $50 million in redevelopment funds. Representatives from Thomas Enterprises Inc., the developer of The Railyards, could not be reached for comment about the potential impact of the budget cuts.

Steve Goodwin, a partner in the Township 9 project that includes plans for 2,300 homes as well as offices and retail, said predicting the impact is difficult.

“We are still trying to sort it all out,” he said. “I don’t know if it has affected our project specifically. We know we are a priority for SHRA and a priority for the city, so we hope any hiccups will be dealt with as they come up.”

But the impact is going to be devastating on cities that are in need of stimulus, Goodwin said.

The Township 9 project was awarded $30 million in state funds under Proposition 1C, which provides funding for transit-oriented and infill projects throughout California. But it has yet to receive any of the funding, even though awards were announced more than a year ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #643  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2009, 4:42 AM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,079
Sacramento Project ‘Almost a City in Itself’



New York Times
August 12, 2009

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/12/re...1&ref=business

SACRAMENTO — The western terminus of the first transcontinental railroad is a forlorn place these days. All that is left of the historic railyards are seven immense brick buildings, the remnants of an era when this site was the busiest industrial center in northern California. There is little indication yet of a $5.3 billion redevelopment plan to transform the site.

But the old railroad buildings are expected to come back to life as the retail portion of a huge project called the Sacramento Railyards. In the next 20 years, the developer Thomas Enterprises, based in Newnan, Ga., plans to build up to 12,000 residential units, 800,000 square feet of commercial space, scattered small parks, a railroad history museum and a performing arts center.

The ambitious housing plans reflect the anticipated growth of Sacramento, a city of 481,097 people that is expecting 100,000 new residents in the next 20 years. Thomas Enterprises says it intends to build many of the first 400 residential units in mixed-use projects, with retailing at street level and housing on upper stories. In later phases, the plan calls for more units, this time in a mix of low-rise and high-rise apartment buildings.

Much of the commercial appeal of the project results from its proximity to downtown Sacramento, particularly the central business district and the State Capitol complex, which lie south of the old train yards. When completed, the old Union Pacific property will become an extension of the downtown, effectively doubling its size.

The 240-acre Sacramento Railyards is “probably the largest urban infill project in the country right now,” said David Kwong, planning manager for the City of Sacramento. In both size and the variety of building types, he added, the project is “almost a city in itself.”

The abandoned train yards had been one of Sacramento’s most imposing redevelopment challenges, long before the city approved the project in 2007.

“You could drive by those old buildings for years without thinking anything of them,” said Michael T. Ault, executive director of the Downtown Sacramento Partnership, a business improvement district representing property owners and tenants. “It’s not until you go and actually look at them that you realize their potential,” he added.

At one time, 100 “workshops,” as the old industrial buildings were known, produced new steam engines and passenger cars, among other goods. At the peak of activity during World War II, more than 7,000 people worked there.

After the war, however, work at the yards declined steadily. In 1999, the Union Pacific Railroad closed its last remaining industrial operations at the yards, and demolished many buildings in anticipation of selling portions of the site to developers.

The redevelopment of the site started in 2002, when Union Pacific offered 37 acres for sale. “We told the railroad we wanted the entire thing,” recalled Suheil J. Totah, vice president of Thomas Enterprises.

At first, the railroad was reluctant to sell, partly out of concern about liability for site contamination, according to Mr. Totah. Former railyards are notoriously polluted, and the railroad owner had already removed more than 800,000 cubic yards of tainted earth from the property.

To shield the railroad from future lawsuits stemming from contamination, Mr. Totah had to find insurers able to write policies on brownfields — disused industrial sites with a strong likelihood of pollution. “It wasn’t easy to find insurers who could underwrite a project of this scale,” Mr. Totah said.

After four years of negotiation, Thomas Enterprises completed the purchase at an undisclosed price.

The few remaining industrial buildings form the centerpiece of the development. On a tour of the site, Richard Rich, the company’s development director, opened the door to the Erecting Shop, a 68-foot-tall single-story structure more reminiscent of an old church than a modern factory. The only interior light came from rows of windows on either side, far above his head.

“This is the first industrial building in California,” Mr. Rich said. The structure was built in 1868, one year before the Golden Spike was driven in Utah, connecting Sacramento by rail to the rest of the nation. For decades, Union Pacific workers assembled locomotive engines in the building.

Renovation of the Erecting Shop and the six other historic buildings are part of the first phase of construction, set to start in 2011. After historic preservation and structural reinforcements for seismic safety, the renovated workshops will become the core of a retail district.

New structures will fill out the historically themed shopping area. The developers plan to build a new structure atop the foundation of the demolished roundhouse building. The roundhouse was used to switch locomotives from one set of tracks to another using a circular turntable.

Instead of rebuilding the roundhouse in a historical style, however, the new building will be an “honestly modern building on a historic footprint,” Mr. Rich said. The new building will contain both commercial space and the railroad museum.

The redevelopment of the site dovetails with the construction of an adjacent project, a $300 million transit station to be built by the City of Sacramento. The 16-acre station will provide connections among trains, light rail, buses and taxis. Thomas Enterprises is selling the city a portion of railroad land on which to build the station.

Although separate from the Sacramento Railyards project, the transit station is said to be crucial to overall development, because the station is expected to increase the attractiveness of nearby housing, especially among commuters.

Before construction can begin, however, the developer must build new tracks across the site to enable Union Pacific trains to switch tracks quickly without interrupting service.

The new tracks are part of $750 million in new infrastructure. A majority of that amount is to come from local, state and national governments, including federal stimulus money. The first phase of construction requires about $310 million from public sources: $150 million from the city, $130 million from the state and $30 million from the federal government.

A new road system threading through the Railyards is also planned. To cement a strong connection between the Railyards and downtown Sacramento, the developer plans to build two bridges to carry traffic over existing tracks that separate the two areas. “Connectivity to downtown is crucial to this project,” Mr. Rich said.

Although it is playing up the history of the site, Thomas Enterprises plans to make new and old buildings harmonize through the use of similar materials, notably brick and glass.

“This will not be ‘suburban urban,’ ” said Mr. Rich, alluding to the faux-historical style of many recent outdoor shopping centers. The Railyards, he said, will be “gritty, like a city.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #644  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2009, 7:18 AM
Schmoe's Avatar
Schmoe Schmoe is offline
NIMBY Hater
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 1,054
So what is the orientation of that rendering of Sacouver?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #645  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2009, 8:01 AM
Pistola916 Pistola916 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SAN FRANCISCO/SACRAMENTO
Posts: 634
If Sac turns into what i saw in that rendering, I'm coming home. But i'll be dead by then or collecting pension.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #646  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2009, 8:46 AM
Formula7's Avatar
Formula7 Formula7 is offline
Future 'Scraper Maker
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 14
Ugh... the 20 years part is the biggest heartache for me. I'll be 40 something by then. But not too old to enjoy that. I can't wait for the first couple phases to play out... of course, I may be up north by then... but who knows!

I hope my family stays in Sacramento, that way I'll have a place to stay when I visit the old hometown years from now when this (and other great projects) are all said and done.
__________________
Up is the answer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #647  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2009, 5:17 PM
Cynikal's Avatar
Cynikal Cynikal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schmoe View Post
So what is the orientation of that rendering of Sacouver?
The rendering is done from just north of the shops looking south into downtown.
__________________
WWJJD*

*What Whould Jane Jacobs Do?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #648  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2009, 6:53 PM
tronblue's Avatar
tronblue tronblue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 119
hmmm where is the bike lane in that rendering?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #649  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2009, 7:00 PM
Cynikal's Avatar
Cynikal Cynikal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 238
Most renderings don't have details like that. If you look closely, there are significant innaccuracies with the rendering. Most, if not all, of the buildings along Cap Mall are not there and most of the building density is closer to mid-town. Just take it for what it is, an artistic rendering.
__________________
WWJJD*

*What Whould Jane Jacobs Do?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #650  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2009, 7:05 PM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,079
According to the rendering in 20 years, all our current towers like the
Fed. Court building and Wells Fargo tower will be gone? I don't see the railyards
being finished in 20 years much less a market growing fast enough to absorb
all the office/residential/retail space expected to be available. If the whole
240 acres were to be developed in 20 years I'll be shocked, I bet it takes
much longer than that at a projected cost of $5.3 billion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #651  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2009, 9:12 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,402
Actually, the rendering is taken from the north of the Shops buildingsfacing east, not south. The renderings of towers are entirely theoretical new towers in the Railyards district--the only non-imaginary buildings in the rendering are the Pattern Shop and Car Shop buildings and the edge of the Erecting Shop on the very far right. The re-creation of the Roundhouse covers the old Roundhouse footprint, which was open to the south.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #652  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2009, 3:35 PM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,079
$20 million at stake for Sacramento railyard project

Sacramento Bee
http://www.sacbee.com/ourregion/story/2133273.html
Monday, Aug. 24, 2009

A $20 million uncertainty hovers over Sacramento's downtown railyard this week.

The city has been awarded that amount to help move the train tracks a few hundred feet north, making room for a transit center behind the depot, and allowing Fifth and Sixth streets to extend on bridges into the railyard to jump-start development.

But there's a catch.

The $20 million is from the federal economic stimulus program, which supposedly goes only to projects that are "shovel ready."

The rail move project is not yet shovel ready.

City officials have been given a Dec. 1 deadline to get paperwork in order and show that they are prepared to hire a contractor. If the city doesn't meet the deadline, the money gets pulled.

The clock is ticking.

Ironically, the city finds itself waiting on none other than the federal government.

Federal transportation officials are reviewing the project's environmental documents. Several times lately, city officials have said they expected a federal OK of those documents any day.

As of Friday, they were still waiting.

City transportation head Jerry Way said he's confident the feds will come through.

But if it doesn't happen in the next few weeks, some in the city say they will be hard-pressed to pull the final designs and applications together to meet the December deadline.

Federal highway representatives declined an interview request Friday. They sent an e-mail saying, in essence: It's complicated. But we're making progress.

Sacramento Rep. Doris Matsui's office is pushing for a conclusion.

Several federal agencies will meet today to "hash out some things," highway spokesman Doug Hecox said. "No one is in jeopardy of losing that money right now."

One issue on the table is how the city will handle any discovery of historic artifacts when the digging begins.

The $20 million is by far the most any project in Sacramento is scheduled to get in federal stimulus funds.

It took an unusual amount of political good will for the region's leaders to agree earlier this year to pour that much into one project.

Yolo County Supervisor Helen Thomson said she agreed because the huge infill project will mean less sprawl development on farmland and less need for expensive new roads in rural areas.

Rancho Cordova Councilwoman Linda Budge said the expenditure will leverage private investment money.

But regional leaders are hedging their bets.

If the city of Sacramento doesn't make its deadline, Thomson and others at the Sacramento Area Council of Governments have a list of smaller projects ready to gobble up the money.

They include new street technology for Elk Grove, traffic signals for Marysville, bus facility funds for Regional Transit, and Tower Bridge gateway work.

And the long-awaited railyard development will just wait some more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #653  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2009, 4:59 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,402
http://www.sacbee.com/opinion/story/2129739.html
Quote:
Editorial: Railyards deal nears finish line

Published: Saturday, Aug. 22, 2009 - 12:00 am | Page 12A

Sacramento has come one step closer to redeveloping the historic 244-acre site that was the birthplace of the transcontinental railroad and the home of shops that built and repaired locomotives for more than a century. The seven Central Shop buildings (plus a unique three-story privy) in the downtown railyard may not look it in their current state, but they are the jewels of downtown.

Since 1989, the city has had a dream that the Central Shops would be reborn as a public marketplace, a new Railroad Technology Museum and other cultural/entertainment venues.

This week, more than 2 1/2 years after the Union Pacific finally sold the land, the city, the State Lands Commission, California State Parks and the developer, Thomas Enterprises, have settled some remaining, vexing issues:

1. Land exchange

Nearly 25 acres of the 244- acre site lie in the course of the American River as it existed when California entered the Union. Since statehood, the river has changed course because of dams and levees. But the lands formerly under water remain public trust lands governed by the state.

The state, the developer and the city began serious negotiations toward a land exchange in 2004. But the deal never happened.

This week, the city, State Lands and State Parks signed off on a deal whereby State Lands will clear title for the developer to the 25 acres. In exchange, the developer will transfer to State Parks two Central Shops buildings – the Boiler Shop and the Erecting Building – for the technology museum.

This will happen in two phases. The Boiler Shop transfer happens immediately (and State Parks already has the funds to begin work). The Erecting Building transfer occurs when State Parks and the California State Railroad Museum Foundation raise funds to develop the museum – with a three-year clock beginning to run when the buildings are listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

State Lands will get 4 acres on the Sacramento River waterfront from State Parks and 10 acres at Sand Cove from the city. Both of those parcels will be leased back to the city at no cost for use as public parks.

2.Track alignment

State Parks and the developer finally have agreed on track curves connecting Old Sacramento to the proposed new technology museum in the historic Central Shops. It's a tough area for design because of the I Street Bridge, Interstate 5 freeway pillars, switch connections with the Union Pacific main-line tracks and the Sacramento River flood wall. They finally worked out an alignment that would give State Parks the ability to carry the full range of locomotives and rail cars.

City Councilman Ray Tretheway rightly described these agreements as a "stellar resolution to many problems."

Thomas Enterprises has said in the past that it wants the closing and transfers done by next Thursday. With their sign-offs, the city, State Lands and State Parks did their part this week to make that possible. As Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson said Tuesday, "This is a good day for Sacramento."

All that's left is for Thomas Enterprises to sign the deal. Then work can begin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #654  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2009, 3:35 AM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,079
Any bets on whether or not the city can get it's act together before December 1st?

I'm thinking some how, some way, they will fumble this and be burbs will get the dough.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #655  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2009, 3:59 PM
Cynikal's Avatar
Cynikal Cynikal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 238
We will make that deadline. There is too much riding on that.
__________________
WWJJD*

*What Whould Jane Jacobs Do?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #656  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2009, 6:09 AM
Web Web is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynikal View Post
We will make that deadline. There is too much riding on that.
what about the road construction halted due to lack of payment from thomas to teichert??? has this been resolved yet?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #657  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2009, 3:06 PM
Cynikal's Avatar
Cynikal Cynikal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 238
I'll see what I can find out. Most likely Thomas hasn't received the State funds to pay anyone. Honestly, the funding for this project is very complex and I'm not involved in the day to day stuff so it can be hard to track.
__________________
WWJJD*

*What Whould Jane Jacobs Do?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #658  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2009, 2:54 AM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by innov8 View Post
Any bets on whether or not the city can get it's act together before December 1st?

I'm thinking some how, some way, they will fumble this and be burbs will get the dough.

Well put..

Lets not forget about the Railroad Technology museum. Those shops will crumble to the ground before they become an expanded Railroad museum. The state is already trying to figure out which state parks will be able to stay open and which are going to be shutting their gates (or doors). Its unlikely new funding will be forthcoming to refurbish the shops anytime soon (which is what I predicted almost two years ago.)
__________________
“The best friend on earth of man is the tree. When we use the tree respectfully and economically, we have one of the greatest resources on the earth.” – Frank Lloyd Wright
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #659  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2009, 5:07 AM
Rail>Auto's Avatar
Rail>Auto Rail>Auto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 500
I hated to see the canal scrapped... Especially since their only reasonings were fear of people falling in and keeping the water clean.... Come on people.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #660  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2009, 6:54 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,402
News!

http://www.sacbee.com/latest/story/2182109.html
Quote:
Sacramento railyards redevelopment to resume
ShareThis

Buzz up!By Tony Bizjak
tbizjak@sacbee.com
Published: Monday, Sep. 14, 2009 - 11:34 am
Stalled for weeks for lack of funds, the downtown Sacramento railyards development project is expected to resume this month with construction of a bridge at Fifth Street.

Railyard developer Thomas Enterprises last week signed final agreements with state housing and community development officials to receive $47 million in state infrastructure bonds over the next few years. It's money the cash-strapped railyards owner needs to resume the initial groundwork on a decades-long development project in the northwest corner of Sacramento's downtown.

"It's a huge step forward," Thomas official Suheil Totah said Monday of the funding agreements with the state. "This will be the first actual check I can take to the bank and cash."

The state had agreed last year to give Sacramento's downtown project a large slice of the statewide voter-approved Prop. 1C funds. The Thomas company broke ground on roadwork for the project this spring, but halted that work months later as the state's budget woes slowed funding.

The development company has made an initial request of nearly $4 million in state funds to pay consultants for work already done.

Totah said his company hopes to build Fifth Street on a three-lane bridge north over the railroad tracks into the railyards by 2011. That street will hook up with the development's main street, an east-west road called Railyards Boulevard. That will follow with an extension of Sixth Street into the railyards. The street connections to downtown will help open the site for development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:59 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.